EV-TRACK

Search > Results

You searched for: 2022 (Year of publication)

Showing 1 - 50 of 669

Results list

Details	EV-TRACK ID	Experiment nr.	Species	Sample type	Separation protocol	First author	Year	EV-METRIC
	EV220127	1/2	Homo sapiens	lung tissue	(d)(U)C DG Filtration	Liu, Bowen/ Jin, Yuan	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Extracellular vesicles from lung tissue drive bone marrow neutrophil recruitment in inflammation All authors Bowen Liu, Yuan Jin, Jingyi Yang, Yue Han, Hui Shan, Mantang Qiu, Xuyang Zhao, Anhang Liu, Yan Jin, Yuxin Yin Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are single-membrane vesicles that play an essential role in long-range (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are single-membrane vesicles that play an essential role in long-range intercellular communications. EV investigation has been explored largely through cell-culture systems, but it remains unclear how physiological EVs exert homeostatic or pathological functions in vivo. Here, we report that lung EVs promote chemotaxis of neutrophils in bone marrow through delivery of double stranded DNA (dsDNA). We have identified and characterized EVs containing dsDNA collected from both human and murine lung tissues using newly developed approaches. Our analysis of EV proteomics together with single-cell RNA sequencing data reveals that type II alveolar epithelial cells are the main source of the lung EVs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the lung EVs accumulate in bone marrow and enhance neutrophil recruitment under inflammation conditions. Moreover, lung EV-DNA stimulates neutrophils to release the chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 via DNA-TLR9 signalling. Our findings establish a molecular basis of lung EVs in enhancement of host immune response to bacterial infection and provide new insights into understanding of vesicle-mediated systematic communications. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (80th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type lung tissue Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Density gradient Filtration Adj. k-factor 20553 (pelleting) / 17842 (washing) Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD9/ CD81 non-EV: Albumin/ Argonaute-2/ Calreticulin/ GM130/ PMP70/ Prohibitin/ Tamm-Horsfall protein Proteomics yes EV density (g/ml) 1.1 Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches)/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type lung tissue Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 70 Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 110,000 Pelleting: adjusted k-factor 20553 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 1.5 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type TLA-55 Wash: speed (g) 110,000 Wash: adjusted k-factor 17842 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 10 Lowest density fraction 0.25 M Highest density fraction 2.5 M Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.45 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type MLS-50 Speed (g) 180,000 Duration (min) 780 Fraction volume (mL) 0.45 Fraction processing Centrifugation Pelleting: volume per fraction 1.5 Pelleting: speed (g) 110,000 Pelleting: adjusted k-factor 17842 Pelleting-wash: volume per pellet (mL) 1.5 Pelleting-wash: duration (min) 70 Pelleting-wash: speed (g) TLA-55 Filtration steps 0.2 or 0.22 µm Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Protein Yield (µg) 0.8 Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD9/ CD81 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 131.7 Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD LSRFortessa Hardware adjustment use calibration beads Calibration bead size 0.05/ 0.1/ 0.2/ 0.3/ 0.5 Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 100 - 200 EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV220127	2/2	Mus musculus	lung tissue	(d)(U)C DG Filtration	Liu, Bowen/ Jin, Yuan	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Extracellular vesicles from lung tissue drive bone marrow neutrophil recruitment in inflammation All authors Bowen Liu, Yuan Jin, Jingyi Yang, Yue Han, Hui Shan, Mantang Qiu, Xuyang Zhao, Anhang Liu, Yan Jin, Yuxin Yin Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are single-membrane vesicles that play an essential role in long-range (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are single-membrane vesicles that play an essential role in long-range intercellular communications. EV investigation has been explored largely through cell-culture systems, but it remains unclear how physiological EVs exert homeostatic or pathological functions in vivo. Here, we report that lung EVs promote chemotaxis of neutrophils in bone marrow through delivery of double stranded DNA (dsDNA). We have identified and characterized EVs containing dsDNA collected from both human and murine lung tissues using newly developed approaches. Our analysis of EV proteomics together with single-cell RNA sequencing data reveals that type II alveolar epithelial cells are the main source of the lung EVs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the lung EVs accumulate in bone marrow and enhance neutrophil recruitment under inflammation conditions. Moreover, lung EV-DNA stimulates neutrophils to release the chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 via DNA-TLR9 signalling. Our findings establish a molecular basis of lung EVs in enhancement of host immune response to bacterial infection and provide new insights into understanding of vesicle-mediated systematic communications. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (80th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type lung tissue Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Density gradient Filtration Adj. k-factor 20553 (pelleting) / 17842 (washing) Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD9/ Flotillin-1/ TSG101 non-EV: GM130/ Calnexin/ Albumin/ Argonaute-2/ Calreticulin/ PMP70/ Prohibitin/ Tamm-Horsfall protein Proteomics yes EV density (g/ml) 1.1 Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches)/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type lung tissue Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 70 Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 110,000 Pelleting: adjusted k-factor 20553 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 1.5 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type TLA-55 Wash: speed (g) 110,000 Wash: adjusted k-factor 17842 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 10 Lowest density fraction 0.25 M Highest density fraction 2.5 M Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.45 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type MLS-50 Speed (g) 180,000 Duration (min) 780 Fraction volume (mL) 0.45 Fraction processing Centrifugation Pelleting: volume per fraction 1.5 Pelleting: speed (g) 110,000 Pelleting: adjusted k-factor 17842 Pelleting-wash: volume per pellet (mL) 1.5 Pelleting-wash: duration (min) 70 Pelleting-wash: speed (g) TLA-55 Filtration steps 0.2 or 0.22 µm Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Protein Yield (µg) 0.7 Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD9/ Flotillin-1/ TSG101 Not detected contaminants GM130/ Calnexin Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 124.9 Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD LSRFortessa Hardware adjustment use calibration beads Calibration bead size 0.05/ 0.1/ 0.2/ 0.3/ 0.5 Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 100 - 200 EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210154	1/2	Homo sapiens	human invasive proliferative extravillous cytotrophoblast (HIPEC)	DG (d)(U)C	Bergamelli M	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Human Cytomegalovirus Modifies Placental Small Extracellular Vesicle Composition to Enhance Infection of Fetal Neural Cells In Vitro. All authors Bergamelli M, Martin H, Aubert Y, Mansuy JM, Marcellin M, Burlet-Schiltz O, Hurbain I, Raposo G, Izopet J, Fournier T, Benchoua A, Bénard M, Groussolles M, Cartron G, Tanguy Le Gac Y, Moinard N, D'Angelo G, Malnou CE Journal Viruses Abstract Although placental small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are extensively studied in the context of pre (show more...)Although placental small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are extensively studied in the context of pregnancy, little is known about their role during viral congenital infection, especially at the beginning of pregnancy. In this study, we examined the consequences of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) infection on sEVs production, composition, and function using an immortalized human cytotrophoblast cell line derived from first trimester placenta. By combining complementary approaches of biochemistry, electron microscopy, and quantitative proteomic analysis, we showed that hCMV infection increases the yield of sEVs produced by cytotrophoblasts and modifies their protein content towards a potential proviral phenotype. We further demonstrate that sEVs secreted by hCMV-infected cytotrophoblasts potentiate infection in naive recipient cells of fetal origin, including human neural stem cells. Importantly, these functional consequences are also observed with sEVs prepared from an ex vivo model of infected histocultures from early placenta. Based on these findings, we propose that placental sEVs could be important actors favoring viral dissemination to the fetal brain during hCMV congenital infection. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Other/ small extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Density gradient (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: TSG101/ Alix/ CD63/ CD9/ CD81 non-EV: calnexin/ TOM20 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells human invasive proliferative extravillous cytotrophoblast (HIPEC) EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS overnight (16h) at >=100,000g Cell count 1,00E+08 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 32 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 30 Wash: time (min) 60 Wash: Rotor Type SW 32 Ti Wash: speed (g) 100000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 3 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 40% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 10 Sample volume (mL) 1 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 41 Ti Speed (g) 100000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1,7 Fraction processing Centrifugation Pelleting: volume per fraction 30 Pelleting: duration (min) 60 Pelleting: rotor type SW 32 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Pelleting-wash: volume per pellet (mL) 30 Pelleting-wash: duration (min) 60 Pelleting-wash: speed (g) SW 32 Ti Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Not detected EV-associated proteins CD63 Not detected contaminants calnexin/ TOM20 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 160 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per million cells: 1,00E+06 Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type Mascquant VYB Myltenyi Hardware adjustment Mascquant VYB Myltenyi set up fluorescent beads SSC Megamix, with calibration on gates of 160nm 200nm 250nm and 500nm Calibration bead size 0.16/ 0.2/ 0.25/ 0.5 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per million cells: 1,00E+06 EM EM-type Immuno-EM/ Transmission-EM EM protein CD9/ CD81/ CD63 Image type Close-up, Wide-field Report size (nm) 120

	EV210154	2/2	Homo sapiens	human invasive proliferative extravillous cytotrophoblast (HIPEC)	DG (d)(U)C	Bergamelli M	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Human Cytomegalovirus Modifies Placental Small Extracellular Vesicle Composition to Enhance Infection of Fetal Neural Cells In Vitro. All authors Bergamelli M, Martin H, Aubert Y, Mansuy JM, Marcellin M, Burlet-Schiltz O, Hurbain I, Raposo G, Izopet J, Fournier T, Benchoua A, Bénard M, Groussolles M, Cartron G, Tanguy Le Gac Y, Moinard N, D'Angelo G, Malnou CE Journal Viruses Abstract Although placental small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are extensively studied in the context of pre (show more...)Although placental small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are extensively studied in the context of pregnancy, little is known about their role during viral congenital infection, especially at the beginning of pregnancy. In this study, we examined the consequences of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) infection on sEVs production, composition, and function using an immortalized human cytotrophoblast cell line derived from first trimester placenta. By combining complementary approaches of biochemistry, electron microscopy, and quantitative proteomic analysis, we showed that hCMV infection increases the yield of sEVs produced by cytotrophoblasts and modifies their protein content towards a potential proviral phenotype. We further demonstrate that sEVs secreted by hCMV-infected cytotrophoblasts potentiate infection in naive recipient cells of fetal origin, including human neural stem cells. Importantly, these functional consequences are also observed with sEVs prepared from an ex vivo model of infected histocultures from early placenta. Based on these findings, we propose that placental sEVs could be important actors favoring viral dissemination to the fetal brain during hCMV congenital infection. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin infected by Human Cytomegalovirus / clinical strain VHL/E Focus vesicles Other/ small extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Density gradient (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: TSG101/ Alix/ CD63/ CD9/ CD81 non-EV: calnexin/ TOM20 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells human invasive proliferative extravillous cytotrophoblast (HIPEC) EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS overnight (16h) at >=100,000g Cell count 1,00E+08 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 32 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 30 Wash: time (min) 60 Wash: Rotor Type SW 32 Ti Wash: speed (g) 100000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 3 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 40% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 10 Sample volume (mL) 1 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 41 Ti Speed (g) 100000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1,7 Fraction processing Centrifugation Pelleting: volume per fraction 30 Pelleting: duration (min) 60 Pelleting: rotor type SW 32 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Pelleting-wash: volume per pellet (mL) 30 Pelleting-wash: duration (min) 60 Pelleting-wash: speed (g) SW 32 Ti Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ CD63/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Not detected contaminants calnexin/ TOM20 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 150 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per million cells: 1,00E+06 Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type Macsquant VYB Myltenyi Hardware adjustment Mascquant VYB Myltenyi set up fluorescent beads SSC Megamix, with calibration on gates of 160nm 200nm 250nm and 500nm Calibration bead size 0.16/ 0.2/ 0.25/ 0.5 Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 160 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per million cells: 1,00E+06 EM EM-type Immuno-EM/ Transmission-EM EM protein CD9/ CD81/ CD63 Image type Close-up, Wide-field Report size (nm) 110

	EV210151	1/8	Homo sapiens	hiPSC (IMR90)-4	DG (d)(U)C Filtration	Louro, Ana Filipa	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Bioactivity and miRNome Profiling of Native Extracellular Vesicles in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation All authors Ana F Louro, Marta A Paiva, Marta R Oliveira, Katharina A Kasper, Paula M Alves, Patrícia Gomes-Alves, Margarida Serra Journal Advanced Science Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, i (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, identification of native EV and corresponding cell platform(s) suitable for therapeutic application, is still a challenge. Here, EV are isolated from key stages of the human induced pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) differentiation and maturation, i.e., from hiPSC (hiPSC-EV), cardiac progenitors, immature and mature cardiomyocytes, with the aim of identifying a promising cell biofactory for EV production, and pinpoint the genetic signatures of bioactive EV. EV secreted by hiPSC and cardiac derivatives show a typical size distribution profile and the expression of specific EV markers. Bioactivity assays show increased tube formation and migration in HUVEC treated with hiPSC-EV compared to EV from committed cell populations. hiPSC-EV also significantly increase cell cycle activity of hiPSC-CM. Global miRNA expression profiles, obtained by small RNA-seq analysis, corroborate an EV-miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification, confirming that hiPSC-EV are enriched in pluripotency-associated miRNA with higher in vitro pro-angiogenic and pro-proliferative properties. In particular, a stemness maintenance miRNA cluster upregulated in hiPSC-EV targets the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the findings validate hiPSC as cell biofactories for EV production for cardiac regenerative applications. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101/ CD63/ Flotillin2 non-EV: Argonaute2 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.08 Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells hiPSC (IMR90)-4 EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 95 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 180 Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 110000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 40% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 16.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.8 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 28.1 Speed (g) 110000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ Flotillin2 Not detected EV-associated proteins TSG101 Not detected contaminants Argonaute2 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type RNA sequencing Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 50-250 EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cell per 24h;Yes, other: 2.23E7 +- 1.35E7 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210151	2/8	Homo sapiens	CPC (IMR90)-4	DG (d)(U)C Filtration	Louro, Ana Filipa	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Bioactivity and miRNome Profiling of Native Extracellular Vesicles in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation All authors Ana F Louro, Marta A Paiva, Marta R Oliveira, Katharina A Kasper, Paula M Alves, Patrícia Gomes-Alves, Margarida Serra Journal Advanced Science Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, i (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, identification of native EV and corresponding cell platform(s) suitable for therapeutic application, is still a challenge. Here, EV are isolated from key stages of the human induced pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) differentiation and maturation, i.e., from hiPSC (hiPSC-EV), cardiac progenitors, immature and mature cardiomyocytes, with the aim of identifying a promising cell biofactory for EV production, and pinpoint the genetic signatures of bioactive EV. EV secreted by hiPSC and cardiac derivatives show a typical size distribution profile and the expression of specific EV markers. Bioactivity assays show increased tube formation and migration in HUVEC treated with hiPSC-EV compared to EV from committed cell populations. hiPSC-EV also significantly increase cell cycle activity of hiPSC-CM. Global miRNA expression profiles, obtained by small RNA-seq analysis, corroborate an EV-miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification, confirming that hiPSC-EV are enriched in pluripotency-associated miRNA with higher in vitro pro-angiogenic and pro-proliferative properties. In particular, a stemness maintenance miRNA cluster upregulated in hiPSC-EV targets the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the findings validate hiPSC as cell biofactories for EV production for cardiac regenerative applications. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101/ CD63/ Flotillin2 non-EV: Argonaute2 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.08 Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells CPC (IMR90)-4 EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 85 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 180 Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 110000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 40% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 16.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.8 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 28.1 Speed (g) 110000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ Flotillin2/ TSG101 Not detected contaminants Argonaute2 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type RNAsequencing Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 50-250 EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cell per 24h;Yes, other: 8.27E6 +- 3.53E6 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210151	3/8	Homo sapiens	CMi (IMR90)-4	DG (d)(U)C Filtration	Louro, Ana Filipa	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Bioactivity and miRNome Profiling of Native Extracellular Vesicles in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation All authors Ana F Louro, Marta A Paiva, Marta R Oliveira, Katharina A Kasper, Paula M Alves, Patrícia Gomes-Alves, Margarida Serra Journal Advanced Science Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, i (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, identification of native EV and corresponding cell platform(s) suitable for therapeutic application, is still a challenge. Here, EV are isolated from key stages of the human induced pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) differentiation and maturation, i.e., from hiPSC (hiPSC-EV), cardiac progenitors, immature and mature cardiomyocytes, with the aim of identifying a promising cell biofactory for EV production, and pinpoint the genetic signatures of bioactive EV. EV secreted by hiPSC and cardiac derivatives show a typical size distribution profile and the expression of specific EV markers. Bioactivity assays show increased tube formation and migration in HUVEC treated with hiPSC-EV compared to EV from committed cell populations. hiPSC-EV also significantly increase cell cycle activity of hiPSC-CM. Global miRNA expression profiles, obtained by small RNA-seq analysis, corroborate an EV-miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification, confirming that hiPSC-EV are enriched in pluripotency-associated miRNA with higher in vitro pro-angiogenic and pro-proliferative properties. In particular, a stemness maintenance miRNA cluster upregulated in hiPSC-EV targets the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the findings validate hiPSC as cell biofactories for EV production for cardiac regenerative applications. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101/ CD63/ Flotillin2 non-EV: Argonaute2 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.08 Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells CMi (IMR90)-4 EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 85 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 180 Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 110000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 40% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 16.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.8 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 28.1 Speed (g) 110000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ Flotillin2/ TSG101 Not detected contaminants Argonaute2 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type RNAsequencing Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 50-250 EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cell per 24h;Yes, other: 2.95E7 +- 1.19E7 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210151	4/8	Homo sapiens	CMm (IMR90)-4	DG (d)(U)C Filtration	Louro, Ana Filipa	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Bioactivity and miRNome Profiling of Native Extracellular Vesicles in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation All authors Ana F Louro, Marta A Paiva, Marta R Oliveira, Katharina A Kasper, Paula M Alves, Patrícia Gomes-Alves, Margarida Serra Journal Advanced Science Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, i (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, identification of native EV and corresponding cell platform(s) suitable for therapeutic application, is still a challenge. Here, EV are isolated from key stages of the human induced pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) differentiation and maturation, i.e., from hiPSC (hiPSC-EV), cardiac progenitors, immature and mature cardiomyocytes, with the aim of identifying a promising cell biofactory for EV production, and pinpoint the genetic signatures of bioactive EV. EV secreted by hiPSC and cardiac derivatives show a typical size distribution profile and the expression of specific EV markers. Bioactivity assays show increased tube formation and migration in HUVEC treated with hiPSC-EV compared to EV from committed cell populations. hiPSC-EV also significantly increase cell cycle activity of hiPSC-CM. Global miRNA expression profiles, obtained by small RNA-seq analysis, corroborate an EV-miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification, confirming that hiPSC-EV are enriched in pluripotency-associated miRNA with higher in vitro pro-angiogenic and pro-proliferative properties. In particular, a stemness maintenance miRNA cluster upregulated in hiPSC-EV targets the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the findings validate hiPSC as cell biofactories for EV production for cardiac regenerative applications. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101/ CD63/ Flotillin2 non-EV: Argonaute2 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.08 Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells CMm (IMR90)-4 EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 85 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 180 Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 110000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 40% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 16.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.8 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 28.1 Speed (g) 110000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ Flotillin2 Not detected EV-associated proteins TSG101 Not detected contaminants Argonaute2 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type RNAsequencing Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 50-250 nm EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cell per 24h;Yes, other: 4.10E7 +- 9.75E6 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV200030	1/2	Homo sapiens	oral mucosa lamina propria progenitor cells	(d)(U)C Other/ ExoSpin UF Filtration DG	Knight R	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Oral Progenitor Cell Line-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles as a Treatment for Preferential Wound Healing Outcome. All authors Knight R, Board-Davies E, Brown H, Clayton A, Davis T, Karatas B, Burston J, Tabi Z, Falcon-Perez JM, Paisey S, Stephens P Journal Stem Cells Transl Med Abstract Scar formation during wound repair can be devastating for affected individuals. Our group previously (show more...)Scar formation during wound repair can be devastating for affected individuals. Our group previously documented the therapeutic potential of novel progenitor cell populations from the non-scarring buccal mucosa. These Oral Mucosa Lamina Propria-Progenitor Cells (OMLP-PCs) are multipotent, immunosuppressive, and antibacterial. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) may play important roles in stem cell-mediated repair in varied settings/ hence, we investigated sEVs from this source for wound repair. We created an hTERT immortalized OMLP-PC line (OMLP-PCL) and confirmed retention of morphology, lineage plasticity, surface markers, and functional properties. sEVs isolated from OMLP-PCL were analyzed by nanoparticle tracking analysis, Cryo-EM and flow cytometry. Compared to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSC) sEVs, OMLP-PCL sEVs were more potent at driving wound healing functions, including cell proliferation and wound repopulation and downregulated myofibroblast formation. A reduced scarring potential was further demonstrated in a preclinical in vivo model. Manipulation of OMLP-PCL sEVs may provide novel options for non-scarring wound healing in clinical settings. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Other/ small extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Commercial method Ultrafiltration Filtration Density gradient Protein markers EV: CD81/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: CD105/ CD90/ CD166 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells oral mucosa lamina propria progenitor cells EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Only used for validation of main results Yes Type Continuous Lowest density fraction 0.2M Highest density fraction 2.5M Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 5 Sample volume (mL) 0.2 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type MLS-50 Speed (g) 200000 Duration (min) 16 Fraction volume (mL) 0.3 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Polyethersulfone (PES) Commercial kit Other/ ExoSpin Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Flow cytometry aspecific beads Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ CD63/ CD81 Not detected contaminants CD90/ CD105/ CD166 Flow cytometry specific beads Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 94 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 7.7E+12 EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV200030	2/2	Homo sapiens	bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells	(d)(U)C Other/ ExoSpin UF Filtration DG	Knight R	2022	100%
Study summary Full title Oral Progenitor Cell Line-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles as a Treatment for Preferential Wound Healing Outcome. All authors Knight R, Board-Davies E, Brown H, Clayton A, Davis T, Karatas B, Burston J, Tabi Z, Falcon-Perez JM, Paisey S, Stephens P Journal Stem Cells Transl Med Abstract Scar formation during wound repair can be devastating for affected individuals. Our group previously (show more...)Scar formation during wound repair can be devastating for affected individuals. Our group previously documented the therapeutic potential of novel progenitor cell populations from the non-scarring buccal mucosa. These Oral Mucosa Lamina Propria-Progenitor Cells (OMLP-PCs) are multipotent, immunosuppressive, and antibacterial. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) may play important roles in stem cell-mediated repair in varied settings/ hence, we investigated sEVs from this source for wound repair. We created an hTERT immortalized OMLP-PC line (OMLP-PCL) and confirmed retention of morphology, lineage plasticity, surface markers, and functional properties. sEVs isolated from OMLP-PCL were analyzed by nanoparticle tracking analysis, Cryo-EM and flow cytometry. Compared to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSC) sEVs, OMLP-PCL sEVs were more potent at driving wound healing functions, including cell proliferation and wound repopulation and downregulated myofibroblast formation. A reduced scarring potential was further demonstrated in a preclinical in vivo model. Manipulation of OMLP-PCL sEVs may provide novel options for non-scarring wound healing in clinical settings. (hide) EV-METRIC 100% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Other/ small extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Commercial method Ultrafiltration Filtration Density gradient Protein markers EV: CD81/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Only used for validation of main results Yes Type Continuous Lowest density fraction 0.2M Highest density fraction 2.5M Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 5 Sample volume (mL) 0.2 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type MLS-50 Speed (g) 200000 Duration (min) 16 Fraction volume (mL) 0.3 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Polyethersulfone (PES) Commercial kit Other/ ExoSpin Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Flow cytometry aspecific beads Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ CD63/ CD81 Not detected contaminants CD90/ CD105/ CD166 Flow cytometry specific beads Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 99.5 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 4.27E+12 EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV200110	1/3	Homo sapiens	NCI-H1975	(d)(U)C DG	Van Hoof R	2022	89%
Study summary Full title Intravesicular Genomic DNA Enriched by Size Exclusion Chromatography Can Enhance Lung Cancer Oncogene Mutation Detection Sensitivity. All authors Van Hoof R, Deville S, Hollanders K, Berckmans P, Wagner P, Hooyberghs J, Nelissen I Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived structures surrounded by a lipid bilayer that carry RN (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived structures surrounded by a lipid bilayer that carry RNA and DNA as potential templates for molecular diagnostics, e.g., in cancer genotyping. While it has been established that DNA templates appear on the outside of EVs, no consensus exists on which nucleic acid species inside small EVs (</ 200 nm, sEVs) are sufficiently abundant and accessible for developing genotyping protocols. We investigated this by extracting total intravesicular nucleic acid content from sEVs isolated from the conditioned cell medium of the human NCI-H1975 cell line containing the epidermal growth factor () gene mutation T790M as a model system for non-small cell lung cancer. We observed that mainly short genomic DNA (</ 35-100 bp) present in the sEVs served as a template. Using qEV size exclusion chromatography (SEC), significantly lower yield and higher purity of isolated sEV fractions were obtained as compared to exoEasy membrane affinity purification and ultracentrifugation. Nevertheless, we detected the T790M mutation in the sEVs' lumen with similar sensitivity using digital PCR. When applying SEC-based sEV separation prior to cell-free DNA extraction on spiked human plasma samples, we found significantly higher mutant allele frequencies as compared to standard cell-free DNA extraction, which in part was due to co-purification of circulating tumor DNA. We conclude that intravesicular genomic DNA can be exploited next to ctDNA to enhance T790M mutation detection sensitivity by adding a fast and easy-to-use sEV separation method, such as SEC, upstream of standard clinical cell-free DNA workflows. (hide) EV-METRIC 89% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Density gradient Protein markers EV: CD81/ HSP70/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin/ Ribosomal protein S6 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Biomarker/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells NCI-H1975 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 32.1 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Density gradient Only used for validation of main results Yes Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 60% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.7 Sample volume (mL) 0.3 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 55 Ti Speed (g) 366613 Duration (min) 960 Fraction volume (mL) 0.48 Fraction processing None Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Lowry-based assay Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins HSP70/ CD81 Detected contaminants Ribosomal protein S6 Not detected contaminants Calnexin Flow cytometry Type of Flow cytometry BD Influx flow cytometer Hardware adaptation to ~100nm EV's EV samples were analyzed using a BD Influx flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) equipped with a 488 nm high power laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector as previously described by van der Vlist et al. (2012). Calibration bead size 0.1/ 0.2 Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ CD9/ CD81 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)(q)PCR/ Capillary electrophoresis (e.g. Bioanalyzer)/ Other Database Yes Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment Yes Moment of RNAse treatment After RNAse type Other/ RNase A/T1 mix RNAse concentration RNase A: 0.02 mg/ml - RNase T1: 50 U/ml Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 202 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per mililiter in the final EV fraction (500 l)/ other:: 5.00E+10 Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD Influx flow cytometer Hardware adjustment EV samples were analyzed using a BD Influx flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) equipped with a 488 nm high power laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector as previously described by van der Vlist et al. (2012). Calibration bead size 1 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210151	5/8	Homo sapiens	hiPSC (DF19-9-11T.H)	DG (d)(U)C Filtration	Louro, Ana Filipa	2022	89%
Study summary Full title Bioactivity and miRNome Profiling of Native Extracellular Vesicles in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation All authors Ana F Louro, Marta A Paiva, Marta R Oliveira, Katharina A Kasper, Paula M Alves, Patrícia Gomes-Alves, Margarida Serra Journal Advanced Science Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, i (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, identification of native EV and corresponding cell platform(s) suitable for therapeutic application, is still a challenge. Here, EV are isolated from key stages of the human induced pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) differentiation and maturation, i.e., from hiPSC (hiPSC-EV), cardiac progenitors, immature and mature cardiomyocytes, with the aim of identifying a promising cell biofactory for EV production, and pinpoint the genetic signatures of bioactive EV. EV secreted by hiPSC and cardiac derivatives show a typical size distribution profile and the expression of specific EV markers. Bioactivity assays show increased tube formation and migration in HUVEC treated with hiPSC-EV compared to EV from committed cell populations. hiPSC-EV also significantly increase cell cycle activity of hiPSC-CM. Global miRNA expression profiles, obtained by small RNA-seq analysis, corroborate an EV-miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification, confirming that hiPSC-EV are enriched in pluripotency-associated miRNA with higher in vitro pro-angiogenic and pro-proliferative properties. In particular, a stemness maintenance miRNA cluster upregulated in hiPSC-EV targets the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the findings validate hiPSC as cell biofactories for EV production for cardiac regenerative applications. (hide) EV-METRIC 89% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101 non-EV: Argonaute2 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.083 Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells hiPSC (DF19-9-11T.H) EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 90 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 180 Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 110000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5 Highest density fraction 40 Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 16.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.8 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 28.1 Speed (g) 110000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TSG101 Not detected contaminants Argonaute2 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 50-250 EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cells per 24h;Yes, other: 1.99E7 +- 1.99E6 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210151	6/8	Homo sapiens	CPC (DF19-9-11T.H)	DG (d)(U)C Filtration	Louro, Ana Filipa	2022	89%
Study summary Full title Bioactivity and miRNome Profiling of Native Extracellular Vesicles in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation All authors Ana F Louro, Marta A Paiva, Marta R Oliveira, Katharina A Kasper, Paula M Alves, Patrícia Gomes-Alves, Margarida Serra Journal Advanced Science Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, i (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, identification of native EV and corresponding cell platform(s) suitable for therapeutic application, is still a challenge. Here, EV are isolated from key stages of the human induced pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) differentiation and maturation, i.e., from hiPSC (hiPSC-EV), cardiac progenitors, immature and mature cardiomyocytes, with the aim of identifying a promising cell biofactory for EV production, and pinpoint the genetic signatures of bioactive EV. EV secreted by hiPSC and cardiac derivatives show a typical size distribution profile and the expression of specific EV markers. Bioactivity assays show increased tube formation and migration in HUVEC treated with hiPSC-EV compared to EV from committed cell populations. hiPSC-EV also significantly increase cell cycle activity of hiPSC-CM. Global miRNA expression profiles, obtained by small RNA-seq analysis, corroborate an EV-miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification, confirming that hiPSC-EV are enriched in pluripotency-associated miRNA with higher in vitro pro-angiogenic and pro-proliferative properties. In particular, a stemness maintenance miRNA cluster upregulated in hiPSC-EV targets the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the findings validate hiPSC as cell biofactories for EV production for cardiac regenerative applications. (hide) EV-METRIC 89% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101 non-EV: Argonaute2 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.083 Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells CPC (DF19-9-11T.H) EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 85 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 180 Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 110000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5 Highest density fraction 40 Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 16.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.8 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 28.1 Speed (g) 110000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TSG101 Not detected contaminants Argonaute2 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 50-250 EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cells per 24h;Yes, other: 6.43E06 +- 5.40E05 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210151	7/8	Homo sapiens	CMi (DF19-9-11T.H)	DG (d)(U)C Filtration	Louro, Ana Filipa	2022	89%
Study summary Full title Bioactivity and miRNome Profiling of Native Extracellular Vesicles in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation All authors Ana F Louro, Marta A Paiva, Marta R Oliveira, Katharina A Kasper, Paula M Alves, Patrícia Gomes-Alves, Margarida Serra Journal Advanced Science Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, i (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, identification of native EV and corresponding cell platform(s) suitable for therapeutic application, is still a challenge. Here, EV are isolated from key stages of the human induced pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) differentiation and maturation, i.e., from hiPSC (hiPSC-EV), cardiac progenitors, immature and mature cardiomyocytes, with the aim of identifying a promising cell biofactory for EV production, and pinpoint the genetic signatures of bioactive EV. EV secreted by hiPSC and cardiac derivatives show a typical size distribution profile and the expression of specific EV markers. Bioactivity assays show increased tube formation and migration in HUVEC treated with hiPSC-EV compared to EV from committed cell populations. hiPSC-EV also significantly increase cell cycle activity of hiPSC-CM. Global miRNA expression profiles, obtained by small RNA-seq analysis, corroborate an EV-miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification, confirming that hiPSC-EV are enriched in pluripotency-associated miRNA with higher in vitro pro-angiogenic and pro-proliferative properties. In particular, a stemness maintenance miRNA cluster upregulated in hiPSC-EV targets the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the findings validate hiPSC as cell biofactories for EV production for cardiac regenerative applications. (hide) EV-METRIC 89% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101 non-EV: Argonaute2 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.083 Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells CMi (DF19-9-11T.H) EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 85 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 180 Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 110000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5 Highest density fraction 40 Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 16.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.8 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 28.1 Speed (g) 110000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TSG101 Not detected contaminants Argonaute2 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 50-250 EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cells per 24h;Yes, other: 3.49E07 +- 2.85E06 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210151	8/8	Homo sapiens	CMm (DF19-9-11T.H)	DG (d)(U)C Filtration	Louro, Ana Filipa	2022	89%
Study summary Full title Bioactivity and miRNome Profiling of Native Extracellular Vesicles in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation All authors Ana F Louro, Marta A Paiva, Marta R Oliveira, Katharina A Kasper, Paula M Alves, Patrícia Gomes-Alves, Margarida Serra Journal Advanced Science Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, i (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EV) are an attractive therapy to boost cardiac regeneration. Nevertheless, identification of native EV and corresponding cell platform(s) suitable for therapeutic application, is still a challenge. Here, EV are isolated from key stages of the human induced pluripotent stem cell-cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) differentiation and maturation, i.e., from hiPSC (hiPSC-EV), cardiac progenitors, immature and mature cardiomyocytes, with the aim of identifying a promising cell biofactory for EV production, and pinpoint the genetic signatures of bioactive EV. EV secreted by hiPSC and cardiac derivatives show a typical size distribution profile and the expression of specific EV markers. Bioactivity assays show increased tube formation and migration in HUVEC treated with hiPSC-EV compared to EV from committed cell populations. hiPSC-EV also significantly increase cell cycle activity of hiPSC-CM. Global miRNA expression profiles, obtained by small RNA-seq analysis, corroborate an EV-miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification, confirming that hiPSC-EV are enriched in pluripotency-associated miRNA with higher in vitro pro-angiogenic and pro-proliferative properties. In particular, a stemness maintenance miRNA cluster upregulated in hiPSC-EV targets the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in cell proliferation and survival. Overall, the findings validate hiPSC as cell biofactories for EV production for cardiac regenerative applications. (hide) EV-METRIC 89% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101 non-EV: Argonaute2 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.083 Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells CMm (DF19-9-11T.H) EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 85 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 180 Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 110000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5 Highest density fraction 40 Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 16.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.8 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 28.1 Speed (g) 110000 Duration (min) 1080 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Filtration steps 0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TSG101 Not detected contaminants Argonaute2 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 50-250 EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cells per 24h;Yes, other: 2.13E07 +- 2.25E06 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV21008	1/2	Homo sapiens	Blood plasma	DG (d)(U)C	Annalisa Radeghieri	2022	89%
Study summary Full title Active antithrombin glycoforms are selectively physiosorbed on plasma extracellular vesicles All authors Annalisa Radeghieri, Silvia Alacqua, Andrea Zendrini, Vanessa Previcini, Francesca Todaro, Giuliana Martini, Doris Ricotta, Paolo Bergese Journal Journal of Extracellular Biology Abstract Antithrombin (AT) is a glycoprotein produced by the liver and a principal antagonist of active clott (show more...)Antithrombin (AT) is a glycoprotein produced by the liver and a principal antagonist of active clotting proteases. A deficit in AT function leads to AT qualitative deficiency, challenging to diagnose. Here we report that active AT may travel physiosorbed on the surface of plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs), contributing to form the “EV-protein corona.” The corona is enriched in specific AT glycoforms, thus suggesting glycosylation to play a key role in AT partitioning between EVs and plasma. Differences in AT glycoform composition of the corona of EVs separated from plasma of healthy and AT qualitative deficiency-affected subjects were also noticed. This suggests deconstructing the plasma into its nanostructured components, as EVs, could suggest novel directions to unravel pathophysiological mechanisms. (hide) EV-METRIC 89% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Blood plasma Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Protein markers EV: TSG101/ CD63/ CD81/ Adam 10/ Alix/ Antithrombin 3 non-EV: Argonaute2/ Apo A1/ GM130 Proteomics no EV density (g/ml) 1.11-1.22 Show all info Study aim Function/Biomarker Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Blood plasma Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 120 Pelleting: rotor type TLA-55 Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 10 Lowest density fraction 8% Highest density fraction 75% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4,8 Sample volume (mL) 1 Orientation Top-down Rotor type MLS-50 Speed (g) 100000 Duration (min) 960 Fraction volume (mL) 0,4 Fraction processing Centrifugation Pelleting: volume per fraction 1 Pelleting: duration (min) 120 Pelleting: rotor type TLA-55 Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ Adam 10/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Apo A1/ GM130 Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ TSG101 Detected contaminants Argonaute2 Detected EV-associated proteins Antithrombin 3 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis EM EM-type Atomic force-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field Report size (nm) 50

	EV210024	3/12	Homo sapiens	Glioblastoma Stem-like cells (GSC)	(d)(U)C DG	André-Grégoire, Gwennan	2022	89%
Study summary Full title Inhibition of the pseudokinase MLKL alters extracellular vesicle release and reduces tumor growth in glioblastoma All authors Gwennan André-Grégoire, Clément Maghe, Tiphaine Douanne, Sara, Rosińska, Fiorella Spinelli, An Thys, Kilian Trillet, Kathryn A.Jacobs, Cyndie Ballu, Aurélien Dupont, Anne-Marie Lyne, Florence M.G.Cavalli, Ignacio Busnelli, Vincent Hyenne, Jacky G.Goetz, Nicolas Bidère, Julie Gavard Journal iScience Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-based nanosized particles that convey biological material fro (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-based nanosized particles that convey biological material from donor to recipient cells. EVs play key roles in glioblastoma progression because glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs) release pro-oncogenic, pro-angiogenic, and pro-inflammatory EVs. However, the molecular basis of EV release remains poorly understood. Here, we report the identification of the pseudokinase MLKL, a crucial effector of cell death by necroptosis, as a regulator of the constitutive secretion of EVs in GSCs. We find that genetic, protein, and pharmacological targeting of MLKL alters intracellular trafficking and EV release, and reduces GSC expansion. Nevertheless, this function ascribed to MLKL appears independent of its role during necroptosis. In vivo, pharmacological inhibition of MLKL reduces the tumor burden and the level of plasmatic EVs. This work highlights the necroptosis-independent role of MLKL in vesicle release and suggests that interfering with EVs is a promising therapeutic option to sensitize glioblastoma cells. (hide) EV-METRIC 89% (99th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Density gradient Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Biogenesis/cargo sorting Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells Glioblastoma Stem-like cells (GSC) EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell count 5.00E+08 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 41 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 11 Wash: time (min) 120 Wash: Rotor Type SW 41 Ti Wash: speed (g) 100000 Density gradient Only used for validation of main results Yes Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 40 Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 11.5 Sample volume (mL) 0.5 Orientation Top-down Rotor type SW 41 Ti Speed (g) 100000 Duration (min) 960 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing Centrifugation Pelleting: volume per fraction 11 Pelleting: duration (min) 120 Pelleting: rotor type SW 41 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ Alix Not detected contaminants GM130 ELISA Detected EV-associated proteins CD63 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis TRPS Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 100 EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field Report size (nm) 50

	EV200110	2/3	Homo sapiens	NCI-H1975	(d)(U)C UF qEV DG	Van Hoof R	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Intravesicular Genomic DNA Enriched by Size Exclusion Chromatography Can Enhance Lung Cancer Oncogene Mutation Detection Sensitivity. All authors Van Hoof R, Deville S, Hollanders K, Berckmans P, Wagner P, Hooyberghs J, Nelissen I Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived structures surrounded by a lipid bilayer that carry RN (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived structures surrounded by a lipid bilayer that carry RNA and DNA as potential templates for molecular diagnostics, e.g., in cancer genotyping. While it has been established that DNA templates appear on the outside of EVs, no consensus exists on which nucleic acid species inside small EVs (</ 200 nm, sEVs) are sufficiently abundant and accessible for developing genotyping protocols. We investigated this by extracting total intravesicular nucleic acid content from sEVs isolated from the conditioned cell medium of the human NCI-H1975 cell line containing the epidermal growth factor () gene mutation T790M as a model system for non-small cell lung cancer. We observed that mainly short genomic DNA (</ 35-100 bp) present in the sEVs served as a template. Using qEV size exclusion chromatography (SEC), significantly lower yield and higher purity of isolated sEV fractions were obtained as compared to exoEasy membrane affinity purification and ultracentrifugation. Nevertheless, we detected the T790M mutation in the sEVs' lumen with similar sensitivity using digital PCR. When applying SEC-based sEV separation prior to cell-free DNA extraction on spiked human plasma samples, we found significantly higher mutant allele frequencies as compared to standard cell-free DNA extraction, which in part was due to co-purification of circulating tumor DNA. We conclude that intravesicular genomic DNA can be exploited next to ctDNA to enhance T790M mutation detection sensitivity by adding a fast and easy-to-use sEV separation method, such as SEC, upstream of standard clinical cell-free DNA workflows. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Ultrafiltration Commercial method Density gradient Protein markers EV: CD81/ HSP70/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin/ Ribosomal protein S6 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Biomarker/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells NCI-H1975 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Only used for validation of main results Yes Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 60% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.7 Sample volume (mL) 0.3 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 55 Ti Speed (g) 366613 Duration (min) 960 Fraction volume (mL) 0.48 Fraction processing None Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins HSP70/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Calnexin/ Ribosomal protein S6 Flow cytometry Type of Flow cytometry BD Influx flow cytometer Hardware adaptation to ~100nm EV's EV samples were analyzed using a BD Influx flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) equipped with a 488 nm high power laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector as previously described by van der Vlist et al. (2012). Calibration bead size 0.1/ 0.2 Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ CD9/ CD81 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)(q)PCR/ Capillary electrophoresis (e.g. Bioanalyzer)/ Other Database Yes Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment Yes Moment of RNAse treatment After RNAse type Other/ RNase A/T1 mix RNAse concentration RNase A: 0.02 mg/ml - RNase T1: 50 U/ml Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 186 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per mililiter in the final EV fraction (500 l)/ other:: 1.70E+10 Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD Influx flow cytometer Hardware adjustment EV samples were analyzed using a BD Influx flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) equipped with a 488 nm high power laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector as previously described by van der Vlist et al. (2012). Calibration bead size 1 Report type Not Reported EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV200110	3/3	Homo sapiens	NCI-H1975	(d)(U)C Other/ exoEasy Filtration DG	Van Hoof R	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Intravesicular Genomic DNA Enriched by Size Exclusion Chromatography Can Enhance Lung Cancer Oncogene Mutation Detection Sensitivity. All authors Van Hoof R, Deville S, Hollanders K, Berckmans P, Wagner P, Hooyberghs J, Nelissen I Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived structures surrounded by a lipid bilayer that carry RN (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived structures surrounded by a lipid bilayer that carry RNA and DNA as potential templates for molecular diagnostics, e.g., in cancer genotyping. While it has been established that DNA templates appear on the outside of EVs, no consensus exists on which nucleic acid species inside small EVs (</ 200 nm, sEVs) are sufficiently abundant and accessible for developing genotyping protocols. We investigated this by extracting total intravesicular nucleic acid content from sEVs isolated from the conditioned cell medium of the human NCI-H1975 cell line containing the epidermal growth factor () gene mutation T790M as a model system for non-small cell lung cancer. We observed that mainly short genomic DNA (</ 35-100 bp) present in the sEVs served as a template. Using qEV size exclusion chromatography (SEC), significantly lower yield and higher purity of isolated sEV fractions were obtained as compared to exoEasy membrane affinity purification and ultracentrifugation. Nevertheless, we detected the T790M mutation in the sEVs' lumen with similar sensitivity using digital PCR. When applying SEC-based sEV separation prior to cell-free DNA extraction on spiked human plasma samples, we found significantly higher mutant allele frequencies as compared to standard cell-free DNA extraction, which in part was due to co-purification of circulating tumor DNA. We conclude that intravesicular genomic DNA can be exploited next to ctDNA to enhance T790M mutation detection sensitivity by adding a fast and easy-to-use sEV separation method, such as SEC, upstream of standard clinical cell-free DNA workflows. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Commercial method Filtration Density gradient Protein markers EV: CD81/ HSP70/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin/ Ribosomal protein S6 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Biomarker/Technical analysis comparing/optimizing EV-related methods Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells NCI-H1975 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Only used for validation of main results Yes Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 4 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 60% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.7 Sample volume (mL) 0.3 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 55 Ti Speed (g) 366613 Duration (min) 960 Fraction volume (mL) 0.48 Fraction processing None Filtration steps > 0.45 µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm Commercial kit Other/ exoEasy Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Lowry-based assay Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins HSP70/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Calnexin/ Ribosomal protein S6 Flow cytometry Type of Flow cytometry BD Influx flow cytometer Hardware adaptation to ~100nm EV's EV samples were analyzed using a BD Influx flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) equipped with a 488 nm high power laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector as previously described by van der Vlist et al. (2012). Calibration bead size 0.1/ 0.2 Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ CD9/ CD81 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)(q)PCR/ Capillary electrophoresis (e.g. Bioanalyzer)/ Other Database Yes Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment Yes Moment of RNAse treatment After RNAse type Other/ RNase A/T1 mix RNAse concentration RNase A: 0.02 mg/ml - RNase T1: 50 U/ml Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 250 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per mililiter in the final EV fraction (500 l)/ other:: 2.60E+11 Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD Influx flow cytometer Hardware adjustment EV samples were analyzed using a BD Influx flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) equipped with a 488 nm high power laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector as previously described by van der Vlist et al. (2012). Calibration bead size 1 Report type Not Reported EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210213	1/6	Homo sapiens	MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H1	DG (d)(U)C	Lischnig A	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Proteins Enriched in Large and Small Extracellular Vesicles. All authors Lischnig A, Bergqvist M, Ochiya T, Lässer C Journal Mol Cell Proteomics Abstract There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs (show more...)There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes. However, recent studies have shown that several of these markers can also be present in other subpopulations of EVs to a similar degree. Furthermore, few markers have been identified as enriched or uniquely present in larger EVs, such as microvesicles. The aim of this study was to address these issues by conducting an in-depth comparison of the proteome of large and small EVs. Large (16,500g) and small EVs (118,000g) were isolated from three cell lines using a combination of differential ultracentrifugation and a density cushion and quantitative mass spectrometry (tandem mass tag-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) was used to identify differently enriched proteins in large and small EVs. In total, 6493 proteins were quantified, with 818 and 1567 proteins significantly enriched in small and large EVs, respectively. Tetraspanins, ADAMs and ESCRT proteins, as well as SNAREs and Rab proteins associated with endosomes were enriched in small EVs compared with large EVs, whereas ribosomal, mitochondrial, and nuclear proteins, as well as proteins involved in cytokinesis, were enriched in large EVs compared with small EVs. However, Flotillin-1 was not differently expressed in large and small EVs. In conclusion, our study shows that the proteome of large and small EVs are substantially dissimilar. We validated several proteins previously suggested to be enriched in either small or large EVs (e.g., ADAM10 and Mitofilin, respectively), and we suggest several additional novel protein markers. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Large extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Density gradient (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H1 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 16500 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 3 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 37.50% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 12 Sample volume (mL) 1.5 Orientation Bottom-up Speed (g) 180000 Duration (min) 120 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Fluorometric assay (e.g. Qubit, NanoOrange,...) Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1 Not detected EV-associated proteins CD81/ CD63 Detected contaminants Calnexin Proteomics database Yes: Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ CD63/ CD81 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 1.45E+07 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up

	EV210213	2/6	Homo sapiens	MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H1	DG (d)(U)C	Lischnig A	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Proteins Enriched in Large and Small Extracellular Vesicles. All authors Lischnig A, Bergqvist M, Ochiya T, Lässer C Journal Mol Cell Proteomics Abstract There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs (show more...)There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes. However, recent studies have shown that several of these markers can also be present in other subpopulations of EVs to a similar degree. Furthermore, few markers have been identified as enriched or uniquely present in larger EVs, such as microvesicles. The aim of this study was to address these issues by conducting an in-depth comparison of the proteome of large and small EVs. Large (16,500g) and small EVs (118,000g) were isolated from three cell lines using a combination of differential ultracentrifugation and a density cushion and quantitative mass spectrometry (tandem mass tag-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) was used to identify differently enriched proteins in large and small EVs. In total, 6493 proteins were quantified, with 818 and 1567 proteins significantly enriched in small and large EVs, respectively. Tetraspanins, ADAMs and ESCRT proteins, as well as SNAREs and Rab proteins associated with endosomes were enriched in small EVs compared with large EVs, whereas ribosomal, mitochondrial, and nuclear proteins, as well as proteins involved in cytokinesis, were enriched in large EVs compared with small EVs. However, Flotillin-1 was not differently expressed in large and small EVs. In conclusion, our study shows that the proteome of large and small EVs are substantially dissimilar. We validated several proteins previously suggested to be enriched in either small or large EVs (e.g., ADAM10 and Mitofilin, respectively), and we suggest several additional novel protein markers. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Small extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Density gradient (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H1 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 118000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 3 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 37.50% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 12 Sample volume (mL) 1.5 Orientation Bottom-up Speed (g) 180000 Duration (min) 120 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Fluorometric assay (e.g. Qubit, NanoOrange,...) Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1 Not detected EV-associated proteins CD81/ CD63 Detected contaminants Calnexin Proteomics database Yes: Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ CD63/ CD81 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 1.45E+07 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up

	EV210213	3/6	Homo sapiens	MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H2LN	DG (d)(U)C	Lischnig A	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Proteins Enriched in Large and Small Extracellular Vesicles. All authors Lischnig A, Bergqvist M, Ochiya T, Lässer C Journal Mol Cell Proteomics Abstract There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs (show more...)There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes. However, recent studies have shown that several of these markers can also be present in other subpopulations of EVs to a similar degree. Furthermore, few markers have been identified as enriched or uniquely present in larger EVs, such as microvesicles. The aim of this study was to address these issues by conducting an in-depth comparison of the proteome of large and small EVs. Large (16,500g) and small EVs (118,000g) were isolated from three cell lines using a combination of differential ultracentrifugation and a density cushion and quantitative mass spectrometry (tandem mass tag-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) was used to identify differently enriched proteins in large and small EVs. In total, 6493 proteins were quantified, with 818 and 1567 proteins significantly enriched in small and large EVs, respectively. Tetraspanins, ADAMs and ESCRT proteins, as well as SNAREs and Rab proteins associated with endosomes were enriched in small EVs compared with large EVs, whereas ribosomal, mitochondrial, and nuclear proteins, as well as proteins involved in cytokinesis, were enriched in large EVs compared with small EVs. However, Flotillin-1 was not differently expressed in large and small EVs. In conclusion, our study shows that the proteome of large and small EVs are substantially dissimilar. We validated several proteins previously suggested to be enriched in either small or large EVs (e.g., ADAM10 and Mitofilin, respectively), and we suggest several additional novel protein markers. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Large extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Density gradient (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H2LN EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 16500 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 3 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 37.50% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 12 Sample volume (mL) 1.5 Orientation Bottom-up Speed (g) 180000 Duration (min) 120 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Fluorometric assay (e.g. Qubit, NanoOrange,...) Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63 Not detected EV-associated proteins CD81 Not detected contaminants Calnexin Proteomics database Yes: Detected EV-associated proteins CD81/ CD9/ CD63 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 8.90E+06 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up

	EV210213	4/6	Homo sapiens	MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H2LN	DG (d)(U)C	Lischnig A	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Proteins Enriched in Large and Small Extracellular Vesicles. All authors Lischnig A, Bergqvist M, Ochiya T, Lässer C Journal Mol Cell Proteomics Abstract There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs (show more...)There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes. However, recent studies have shown that several of these markers can also be present in other subpopulations of EVs to a similar degree. Furthermore, few markers have been identified as enriched or uniquely present in larger EVs, such as microvesicles. The aim of this study was to address these issues by conducting an in-depth comparison of the proteome of large and small EVs. Large (16,500g) and small EVs (118,000g) were isolated from three cell lines using a combination of differential ultracentrifugation and a density cushion and quantitative mass spectrometry (tandem mass tag-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) was used to identify differently enriched proteins in large and small EVs. In total, 6493 proteins were quantified, with 818 and 1567 proteins significantly enriched in small and large EVs, respectively. Tetraspanins, ADAMs and ESCRT proteins, as well as SNAREs and Rab proteins associated with endosomes were enriched in small EVs compared with large EVs, whereas ribosomal, mitochondrial, and nuclear proteins, as well as proteins involved in cytokinesis, were enriched in large EVs compared with small EVs. However, Flotillin-1 was not differently expressed in large and small EVs. In conclusion, our study shows that the proteome of large and small EVs are substantially dissimilar. We validated several proteins previously suggested to be enriched in either small or large EVs (e.g., ADAM10 and Mitofilin, respectively), and we suggest several additional novel protein markers. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Small extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Density gradient (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H2LN EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 118000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 3 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 37.50% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 12 Sample volume (mL) 1.5 Orientation Bottom-up Speed (g) 180000 Duration (min) 120 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Fluorometric assay (e.g. Qubit, NanoOrange,...) Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63 Not detected EV-associated proteins CD81 Not detected contaminants Calnexin Proteomics database Yes: Detected EV-associated proteins CD81/ CD9/ CD63 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 8.90E+06 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up

	EV210213	5/6	Homo sapiens	MDA-MB-231-luc-BMD2a	DG (d)(U)C	Lischnig A	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Proteins Enriched in Large and Small Extracellular Vesicles. All authors Lischnig A, Bergqvist M, Ochiya T, Lässer C Journal Mol Cell Proteomics Abstract There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs (show more...)There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes. However, recent studies have shown that several of these markers can also be present in other subpopulations of EVs to a similar degree. Furthermore, few markers have been identified as enriched or uniquely present in larger EVs, such as microvesicles. The aim of this study was to address these issues by conducting an in-depth comparison of the proteome of large and small EVs. Large (16,500g) and small EVs (118,000g) were isolated from three cell lines using a combination of differential ultracentrifugation and a density cushion and quantitative mass spectrometry (tandem mass tag-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) was used to identify differently enriched proteins in large and small EVs. In total, 6493 proteins were quantified, with 818 and 1567 proteins significantly enriched in small and large EVs, respectively. Tetraspanins, ADAMs and ESCRT proteins, as well as SNAREs and Rab proteins associated with endosomes were enriched in small EVs compared with large EVs, whereas ribosomal, mitochondrial, and nuclear proteins, as well as proteins involved in cytokinesis, were enriched in large EVs compared with small EVs. However, Flotillin-1 was not differently expressed in large and small EVs. In conclusion, our study shows that the proteome of large and small EVs are substantially dissimilar. We validated several proteins previously suggested to be enriched in either small or large EVs (e.g., ADAM10 and Mitofilin, respectively), and we suggest several additional novel protein markers. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Other/ Large extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Density gradient (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDA-MB-231-luc-BMD2a EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 16500 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 3 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 37.50% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 12 Sample volume (mL) 1.5 Orientation Bottom-up Speed (g) 180000 Duration (min) 120 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Fluorometric assay (e.g. Qubit, NanoOrange,...) Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ CD81 Detected contaminants Calnexin Proteomics database Yes: Detected EV-associated proteins CD81/ CD9/ CD63 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 2.30E+07 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up

	EV210213	6/6	Homo sapiens	MDA-MB-231-luc-BMD2a	DG (d)(U)C	Lischnig A	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Proteins Enriched in Large and Small Extracellular Vesicles. All authors Lischnig A, Bergqvist M, Ochiya T, Lässer C Journal Mol Cell Proteomics Abstract There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs (show more...)There is a long-held consensus that several proteins are unique to small extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes. However, recent studies have shown that several of these markers can also be present in other subpopulations of EVs to a similar degree. Furthermore, few markers have been identified as enriched or uniquely present in larger EVs, such as microvesicles. The aim of this study was to address these issues by conducting an in-depth comparison of the proteome of large and small EVs. Large (16,500g) and small EVs (118,000g) were isolated from three cell lines using a combination of differential ultracentrifugation and a density cushion and quantitative mass spectrometry (tandem mass tag-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) was used to identify differently enriched proteins in large and small EVs. In total, 6493 proteins were quantified, with 818 and 1567 proteins significantly enriched in small and large EVs, respectively. Tetraspanins, ADAMs and ESCRT proteins, as well as SNAREs and Rab proteins associated with endosomes were enriched in small EVs compared with large EVs, whereas ribosomal, mitochondrial, and nuclear proteins, as well as proteins involved in cytokinesis, were enriched in large EVs compared with small EVs. However, Flotillin-1 was not differently expressed in large and small EVs. In conclusion, our study shows that the proteome of large and small EVs are substantially dissimilar. We validated several proteins previously suggested to be enriched in either small or large EVs (e.g., ADAM10 and Mitofilin, respectively), and we suggest several additional novel protein markers. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles Small extracellular vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Density gradient (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD63/ CD9 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDA-MB-231-luc-BMD2a EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 118000 Density gradient Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 3 Lowest density fraction 10% Highest density fraction 37.50% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 12 Sample volume (mL) 1.5 Orientation Bottom-up Speed (g) 180000 Duration (min) 120 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing None Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Fluorometric assay (e.g. Qubit, NanoOrange,...) Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ CD81 Detected contaminants Calnexin Proteomics database Yes: Detected EV-associated proteins CD81/ CD9/ CD63 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 2.30E+07 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up

	EV180067	1/5	Mus musculus	MPI cells	UF (d)(U)C qEV DG	Deville S	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Macrophages Release Extracellular Vesicles of Different Properties and Composition Following Exposure to Nanoparticles. All authors Deville S, Garcia Romeu H, Oeyen E, Mertens I, Nelissen I, Salvati A Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in (show more...)Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in intercellular communication, for instance, in the context of the immune response. Macrophages are known to release extracellular vesicles in response to different stimuli, and changes in their size, number, and composition may provide important insights into the responses induced. Macrophages are also known to be highly efficient in clearing nanoparticles, when in contact with them, and in triggering the immune system. However, little is known about how the nature and composition of the vesicles released by these cells may vary upon nanoparticle exposure. In order to study this, in this work, alveolar-like macrophages were exposed to a panel of nanoparticles with varying surface and composition, including amino-modified and carboxylated polystyrene and plain silica. We previously showed that these nanoparticles induced very different responses in these cells. Here, experimental conditions were carefully tuned in order to separate the extracellular vesicles released by the macrophages several hours after exposure to sub-toxic concentrations of the same nanoparticles. After separation, different methods, including high-sensitivity flow cytometry, TEM imaging, Western blotting, and nanoparticle tracking analysis, were combined in order to characterize the extracellular vesicles. Finally, proteomics was used to determine their composition and how it varied upon exposure to the different nanoparticles. Our results show that depending on the nanoparticles' properties. The macrophages produced extracellular vesicles of varying number, size, and protein composition. This indicates that macrophages release specific signals in response to nanoparticles and overall suggests that extracellular vesicles can reflect subtle responses to nanoparticles and nanoparticle impact on intercellular communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Ultrafiltration (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Commercial method Density gradient Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD9 non-EV: Cytochrome C/ GRP94 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MPI cells EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Type Continuous Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 60% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.8 Sample volume (mL) 0.3 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 55 Ti Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1 Not detected contaminants Cytochrome C/ GRP94 Flow cytometry Type of Flow cytometry BD Influx instrument/ CytoFlex Hardware adaptation to ~100nm EV's Both BD Influx instrument (with a small particle detector) and Beckman Coulter CytoFlex instrument have been validated for the measurement of EVs. Calibration bead size 0.1-0.9 µm beads Detected EV-associated proteins CD9 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 116 EV concentration Yes Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD Influx Hardware adjustment BD Influx flow cytometer equipped with a high power 488-nm laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector for high sensitivity forward scatter detection. Calibration bead size 0.1 EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV180067	2/5	Mus musculus	MPI cells	UF (d)(U)C qEV DG	Deville S	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Macrophages Release Extracellular Vesicles of Different Properties and Composition Following Exposure to Nanoparticles. All authors Deville S, Garcia Romeu H, Oeyen E, Mertens I, Nelissen I, Salvati A Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in (show more...)Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in intercellular communication, for instance, in the context of the immune response. Macrophages are known to release extracellular vesicles in response to different stimuli, and changes in their size, number, and composition may provide important insights into the responses induced. Macrophages are also known to be highly efficient in clearing nanoparticles, when in contact with them, and in triggering the immune system. However, little is known about how the nature and composition of the vesicles released by these cells may vary upon nanoparticle exposure. In order to study this, in this work, alveolar-like macrophages were exposed to a panel of nanoparticles with varying surface and composition, including amino-modified and carboxylated polystyrene and plain silica. We previously showed that these nanoparticles induced very different responses in these cells. Here, experimental conditions were carefully tuned in order to separate the extracellular vesicles released by the macrophages several hours after exposure to sub-toxic concentrations of the same nanoparticles. After separation, different methods, including high-sensitivity flow cytometry, TEM imaging, Western blotting, and nanoparticle tracking analysis, were combined in order to characterize the extracellular vesicles. Finally, proteomics was used to determine their composition and how it varied upon exposure to the different nanoparticles. Our results show that depending on the nanoparticles' properties. The macrophages produced extracellular vesicles of varying number, size, and protein composition. This indicates that macrophages release specific signals in response to nanoparticles and overall suggests that extracellular vesicles can reflect subtle responses to nanoparticles and nanoparticle impact on intercellular communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin LPS Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Ultrafiltration (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Commercial method Density gradient Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD9 non-EV: Cytochrome C/ GRP94 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MPI cells EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Type Continuous Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 60% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.8 Sample volume (mL) 0.3 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 55 Ti Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1 Not detected contaminants Cytochrome C/ GRP94 Flow cytometry Type of Flow cytometry BD Influx instrument/ CytoFlex Hardware adaptation to ~100nm EV's Both BD Influx instrument (with a small particle detector) and Beckman Coulter CytoFlex instrument have been validated for the measurement of EVs. Calibration bead size 0.1-0.9 µm beads Detected EV-associated proteins CD9 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 114 EV concentration Yes Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD Influx Hardware adjustment BD Influx flow cytometer equipped with a high power 488-nm laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector for high sensitivity forward scatter detection. Calibration bead size 0.1 Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV180067	3/5	Mus musculus	MPI cells	UF (d)(U)C qEV DG	Deville S	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Macrophages Release Extracellular Vesicles of Different Properties and Composition Following Exposure to Nanoparticles. All authors Deville S, Garcia Romeu H, Oeyen E, Mertens I, Nelissen I, Salvati A Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in (show more...)Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in intercellular communication, for instance, in the context of the immune response. Macrophages are known to release extracellular vesicles in response to different stimuli, and changes in their size, number, and composition may provide important insights into the responses induced. Macrophages are also known to be highly efficient in clearing nanoparticles, when in contact with them, and in triggering the immune system. However, little is known about how the nature and composition of the vesicles released by these cells may vary upon nanoparticle exposure. In order to study this, in this work, alveolar-like macrophages were exposed to a panel of nanoparticles with varying surface and composition, including amino-modified and carboxylated polystyrene and plain silica. We previously showed that these nanoparticles induced very different responses in these cells. Here, experimental conditions were carefully tuned in order to separate the extracellular vesicles released by the macrophages several hours after exposure to sub-toxic concentrations of the same nanoparticles. After separation, different methods, including high-sensitivity flow cytometry, TEM imaging, Western blotting, and nanoparticle tracking analysis, were combined in order to characterize the extracellular vesicles. Finally, proteomics was used to determine their composition and how it varied upon exposure to the different nanoparticles. Our results show that depending on the nanoparticles' properties. The macrophages produced extracellular vesicles of varying number, size, and protein composition. This indicates that macrophages release specific signals in response to nanoparticles and overall suggests that extracellular vesicles can reflect subtle responses to nanoparticles and nanoparticle impact on intercellular communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin NH2-PS NPs Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Ultrafiltration (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Commercial method Density gradient Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD9 non-EV: Cytochrome C/ GRP94 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MPI cells EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Type Continuous Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 60% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.8 Sample volume (mL) 0.3 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 55 Ti Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1 Not detected contaminants Cytochrome C/ GRP94 Flow cytometry Type of Flow cytometry BD Influx instrument/ CytoFlex Hardware adaptation to ~100nm EV's Both BD Influx instrument (with a small particle detector) and Beckman Coulter CytoFlex instrument have been validated for the measurement of EVs. Calibration bead size 0.1-0.9 µm beads Detected EV-associated proteins CD9 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 139 EV concentration Yes Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD Influx Hardware adjustment BD Influx flow cytometer equipped with a high power 488-nm laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector for high sensitivity forward scatter detection. Calibration bead size 0.1 Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV180067	4/5	Mus musculus	MPI cells	UF (d)(U)C qEV DG	Deville S	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Macrophages Release Extracellular Vesicles of Different Properties and Composition Following Exposure to Nanoparticles. All authors Deville S, Garcia Romeu H, Oeyen E, Mertens I, Nelissen I, Salvati A Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in (show more...)Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in intercellular communication, for instance, in the context of the immune response. Macrophages are known to release extracellular vesicles in response to different stimuli, and changes in their size, number, and composition may provide important insights into the responses induced. Macrophages are also known to be highly efficient in clearing nanoparticles, when in contact with them, and in triggering the immune system. However, little is known about how the nature and composition of the vesicles released by these cells may vary upon nanoparticle exposure. In order to study this, in this work, alveolar-like macrophages were exposed to a panel of nanoparticles with varying surface and composition, including amino-modified and carboxylated polystyrene and plain silica. We previously showed that these nanoparticles induced very different responses in these cells. Here, experimental conditions were carefully tuned in order to separate the extracellular vesicles released by the macrophages several hours after exposure to sub-toxic concentrations of the same nanoparticles. After separation, different methods, including high-sensitivity flow cytometry, TEM imaging, Western blotting, and nanoparticle tracking analysis, were combined in order to characterize the extracellular vesicles. Finally, proteomics was used to determine their composition and how it varied upon exposure to the different nanoparticles. Our results show that depending on the nanoparticles' properties. The macrophages produced extracellular vesicles of varying number, size, and protein composition. This indicates that macrophages release specific signals in response to nanoparticles and overall suggests that extracellular vesicles can reflect subtle responses to nanoparticles and nanoparticle impact on intercellular communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin COOH-PS NPs Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Ultrafiltration (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Commercial method Density gradient Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD9 non-EV: Cytochrome C/ GRP94 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MPI cells EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Type Continuous Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 60% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.8 Sample volume (mL) 0.3 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 55 Ti Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1 Not detected contaminants GRP94/ Cytochrome C Flow cytometry Type of Flow cytometry BD Influx instrument/ CytoFlex Hardware adaptation to ~100nm EV's Both BD Influx instrument (with a small particle detector) and Beckman Coulter CytoFlex instrument have been validated for the measurement of EVs. Calibration bead size 0.1-0.9 µm beads Detected EV-associated proteins CD9 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 112 EV concentration Yes Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD Influx Hardware adjustment BD Influx flow cytometer equipped with a high power 488-nm laser (200 mW) and a small-particle detector for high sensitivity forward scatter detection. Calibration bead size 0.1 Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV180067	5/5	Mus musculus	MPI cells	UF (d)(U)C qEV DG	Deville S	2022	88%
Study summary Full title Macrophages Release Extracellular Vesicles of Different Properties and Composition Following Exposure to Nanoparticles. All authors Deville S, Garcia Romeu H, Oeyen E, Mertens I, Nelissen I, Salvati A Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in (show more...)Extracellular vesicles are membrane-bound carriers with complex cargoes, which play a major role in intercellular communication, for instance, in the context of the immune response. Macrophages are known to release extracellular vesicles in response to different stimuli, and changes in their size, number, and composition may provide important insights into the responses induced. Macrophages are also known to be highly efficient in clearing nanoparticles, when in contact with them, and in triggering the immune system. However, little is known about how the nature and composition of the vesicles released by these cells may vary upon nanoparticle exposure. In order to study this, in this work, alveolar-like macrophages were exposed to a panel of nanoparticles with varying surface and composition, including amino-modified and carboxylated polystyrene and plain silica. We previously showed that these nanoparticles induced very different responses in these cells. Here, experimental conditions were carefully tuned in order to separate the extracellular vesicles released by the macrophages several hours after exposure to sub-toxic concentrations of the same nanoparticles. After separation, different methods, including high-sensitivity flow cytometry, TEM imaging, Western blotting, and nanoparticle tracking analysis, were combined in order to characterize the extracellular vesicles. Finally, proteomics was used to determine their composition and how it varied upon exposure to the different nanoparticles. Our results show that depending on the nanoparticles' properties. The macrophages produced extracellular vesicles of varying number, size, and protein composition. This indicates that macrophages release specific signals in response to nanoparticles and overall suggests that extracellular vesicles can reflect subtle responses to nanoparticles and nanoparticle impact on intercellular communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 88% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin SiO2 NPs Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Ultrafiltration (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Commercial method Density gradient Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1/ CD9 non-EV: Cytochrome C/ GRP94 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MPI cells EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Type Continuous Lowest density fraction 5% Highest density fraction 60% Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL) 4.8 Sample volume (mL) 0.3 Orientation Bottom-up Rotor type SW 55 Ti Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD81/ Flotillin1 Not detected contaminants GRP94/ Cytochrome c Flow cytometry Type of Flow cytometry BD Influx instrument/ CytoFlex Hardware adaptation to ~100nm EV's Both BD Influx instrument (with a small particle detector) and Beckman Coulter CytoFlex instrument have been validated for the measurement of EVs. Calibration bead size 0.1-0.9 µm beads Detected EV-associated proteins CD9 Proteomics database No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 102 EV concentration Yes Particle analysis: flow cytometry Flow cytometer type BD Influx Hardware adjustment Calibration bead size 0.1 EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210204	1/12	Homo sapiens	PANC-1	(d)(U)C Filtration	Hinzman CP	2022	78%
Study summary Full title A multi-omics approach identifies pancreatic cancer cell extracellular vesicles as mediators of the unfolded protein response in normal pancreatic epithelial cells. All authors Hinzman CP, Singh B, Bansal S, Li Y, Iliuk A, Girgis M, Herremans KM, Trevino JG, Singh VK, Banerjee PP, Cheema AK Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promotin (show more...)Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promoting cancer progression events, their precise effect on neighbouring normal cells is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of pancreatic cancer ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) derived EVs on recipient non-tumourigenic pancreatic normal epithelial cells upon internalization. We demonstrate that cEVs are readily internalized and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in treated normal pancreatic epithelial cells within 24 h. We further show that PDAC cEVs increase cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and that these changes are regulated at least in part, by the UPR mediator DDIT3. Subsequently, these cells release several inflammatory cytokines. Leveraging a layered multi-omics approach, we analysed EV cargo from a panel of six PDAC and two normal pancreas cell lines, using multiple EV isolation methods. We found that cEVs were enriched for an array of biomolecules which can induce or regulate ER stress and the UPR, including palmitic acid, sphingomyelins, metabolic regulators of tRNA charging and proteins which regulate trafficking and degradation. We further show that palmitic acid, at doses relevant to those found in cEVs, is sufficient to induce ER stress in normal pancreas cells. These results suggest that cEV cargo packaging may be designed to disseminate proliferative and invasive characteristics upon internalization by distant recipient normal cells, hitherto unreported. This study is among the first to highlight a major role for PDAC cEVs to induce stress in treated normal pancreas cells that may modulate a systemic response leading to altered phenotypes. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in mediating disease aetiology and open potential areas of investigation toward understanding the role of cEV lipids in promoting cell transformation in the surrounding microenvironment. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Pancreas cancer Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101/ ANXA5/ CD81/ Alix/ ICAM/ Flotillin1/ EpCAM/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells PANC-1 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ ANXA5/ EpCAM/ ICAM/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Detected contaminants GM130 Proteomics database Yes: Characterization: Lipid analysis Yes Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 180.8 EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210204	2/12	Homo sapiens	PANC-1	(d)(U)C Filtration UF qEV	Hinzman CP	2022	78%
Study summary Full title A multi-omics approach identifies pancreatic cancer cell extracellular vesicles as mediators of the unfolded protein response in normal pancreatic epithelial cells. All authors Hinzman CP, Singh B, Bansal S, Li Y, Iliuk A, Girgis M, Herremans KM, Trevino JG, Singh VK, Banerjee PP, Cheema AK Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promotin (show more...)Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promoting cancer progression events, their precise effect on neighbouring normal cells is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of pancreatic cancer ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) derived EVs on recipient non-tumourigenic pancreatic normal epithelial cells upon internalization. We demonstrate that cEVs are readily internalized and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in treated normal pancreatic epithelial cells within 24 h. We further show that PDAC cEVs increase cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and that these changes are regulated at least in part, by the UPR mediator DDIT3. Subsequently, these cells release several inflammatory cytokines. Leveraging a layered multi-omics approach, we analysed EV cargo from a panel of six PDAC and two normal pancreas cell lines, using multiple EV isolation methods. We found that cEVs were enriched for an array of biomolecules which can induce or regulate ER stress and the UPR, including palmitic acid, sphingomyelins, metabolic regulators of tRNA charging and proteins which regulate trafficking and degradation. We further show that palmitic acid, at doses relevant to those found in cEVs, is sufficient to induce ER stress in normal pancreas cells. These results suggest that cEV cargo packaging may be designed to disseminate proliferative and invasive characteristics upon internalization by distant recipient normal cells, hitherto unreported. This study is among the first to highlight a major role for PDAC cEVs to induce stress in treated normal pancreas cells that may modulate a systemic response leading to altered phenotypes. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in mediating disease aetiology and open potential areas of investigation toward understanding the role of cEV lipids in promoting cell transformation in the surrounding microenvironment. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Pancreas cancer Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Filtration Ultrafiltration Commercial method Protein markers EV: TSG101/ ANXA5/ CD81/ Alix/ ICAM/ Flotillin1/ EpCAM/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells PANC-1 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ ICAM/ EpCAM/ ANXA5/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Detected contaminants GM130 Proteomics database Yes: Characterization: Lipid analysis Yes Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210204	4/12	Homo sapiens	PPCL-68	(d)(U)C Filtration	Hinzman CP	2022	78%
Study summary Full title A multi-omics approach identifies pancreatic cancer cell extracellular vesicles as mediators of the unfolded protein response in normal pancreatic epithelial cells. All authors Hinzman CP, Singh B, Bansal S, Li Y, Iliuk A, Girgis M, Herremans KM, Trevino JG, Singh VK, Banerjee PP, Cheema AK Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promotin (show more...)Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promoting cancer progression events, their precise effect on neighbouring normal cells is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of pancreatic cancer ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) derived EVs on recipient non-tumourigenic pancreatic normal epithelial cells upon internalization. We demonstrate that cEVs are readily internalized and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in treated normal pancreatic epithelial cells within 24 h. We further show that PDAC cEVs increase cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and that these changes are regulated at least in part, by the UPR mediator DDIT3. Subsequently, these cells release several inflammatory cytokines. Leveraging a layered multi-omics approach, we analysed EV cargo from a panel of six PDAC and two normal pancreas cell lines, using multiple EV isolation methods. We found that cEVs were enriched for an array of biomolecules which can induce or regulate ER stress and the UPR, including palmitic acid, sphingomyelins, metabolic regulators of tRNA charging and proteins which regulate trafficking and degradation. We further show that palmitic acid, at doses relevant to those found in cEVs, is sufficient to induce ER stress in normal pancreas cells. These results suggest that cEV cargo packaging may be designed to disseminate proliferative and invasive characteristics upon internalization by distant recipient normal cells, hitherto unreported. This study is among the first to highlight a major role for PDAC cEVs to induce stress in treated normal pancreas cells that may modulate a systemic response leading to altered phenotypes. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in mediating disease aetiology and open potential areas of investigation toward understanding the role of cEV lipids in promoting cell transformation in the surrounding microenvironment. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Pancreas cancer Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101/ ANXA5/ CD81/ Alix/ ICAM/ Flotillin1/ EpCAM/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells PPCL-68 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ ANXA5/ EpCAM/ ICAM/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Detected contaminants GM130 Proteomics database Yes: Characterization: Lipid analysis Yes Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 180.8 EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210204	5/12	Homo sapiens	PPCL-68	(d)(U)C Filtration UF qEV	Hinzman CP	2022	78%
Study summary Full title A multi-omics approach identifies pancreatic cancer cell extracellular vesicles as mediators of the unfolded protein response in normal pancreatic epithelial cells. All authors Hinzman CP, Singh B, Bansal S, Li Y, Iliuk A, Girgis M, Herremans KM, Trevino JG, Singh VK, Banerjee PP, Cheema AK Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promotin (show more...)Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promoting cancer progression events, their precise effect on neighbouring normal cells is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of pancreatic cancer ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) derived EVs on recipient non-tumourigenic pancreatic normal epithelial cells upon internalization. We demonstrate that cEVs are readily internalized and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in treated normal pancreatic epithelial cells within 24 h. We further show that PDAC cEVs increase cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and that these changes are regulated at least in part, by the UPR mediator DDIT3. Subsequently, these cells release several inflammatory cytokines. Leveraging a layered multi-omics approach, we analysed EV cargo from a panel of six PDAC and two normal pancreas cell lines, using multiple EV isolation methods. We found that cEVs were enriched for an array of biomolecules which can induce or regulate ER stress and the UPR, including palmitic acid, sphingomyelins, metabolic regulators of tRNA charging and proteins which regulate trafficking and degradation. We further show that palmitic acid, at doses relevant to those found in cEVs, is sufficient to induce ER stress in normal pancreas cells. These results suggest that cEV cargo packaging may be designed to disseminate proliferative and invasive characteristics upon internalization by distant recipient normal cells, hitherto unreported. This study is among the first to highlight a major role for PDAC cEVs to induce stress in treated normal pancreas cells that may modulate a systemic response leading to altered phenotypes. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in mediating disease aetiology and open potential areas of investigation toward understanding the role of cEV lipids in promoting cell transformation in the surrounding microenvironment. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Pancreas cancer Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Filtration Ultrafiltration Commercial method Protein markers EV: TSG101/ ANXA5/ CD81/ Alix/ ICAM/ Flotillin1/ EpCAM/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells PPCL-68 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ ICAM/ EpCAM/ ANXA5/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Detected contaminants GM130 Proteomics database Yes: Characterization: Lipid analysis Yes Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210204	7/12	Homo sapiens	hTERT-HPNE	(d)(U)C Filtration	Hinzman CP	2022	78%
Study summary Full title A multi-omics approach identifies pancreatic cancer cell extracellular vesicles as mediators of the unfolded protein response in normal pancreatic epithelial cells. All authors Hinzman CP, Singh B, Bansal S, Li Y, Iliuk A, Girgis M, Herremans KM, Trevino JG, Singh VK, Banerjee PP, Cheema AK Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promotin (show more...)Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promoting cancer progression events, their precise effect on neighbouring normal cells is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of pancreatic cancer ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) derived EVs on recipient non-tumourigenic pancreatic normal epithelial cells upon internalization. We demonstrate that cEVs are readily internalized and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in treated normal pancreatic epithelial cells within 24 h. We further show that PDAC cEVs increase cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and that these changes are regulated at least in part, by the UPR mediator DDIT3. Subsequently, these cells release several inflammatory cytokines. Leveraging a layered multi-omics approach, we analysed EV cargo from a panel of six PDAC and two normal pancreas cell lines, using multiple EV isolation methods. We found that cEVs were enriched for an array of biomolecules which can induce or regulate ER stress and the UPR, including palmitic acid, sphingomyelins, metabolic regulators of tRNA charging and proteins which regulate trafficking and degradation. We further show that palmitic acid, at doses relevant to those found in cEVs, is sufficient to induce ER stress in normal pancreas cells. These results suggest that cEV cargo packaging may be designed to disseminate proliferative and invasive characteristics upon internalization by distant recipient normal cells, hitherto unreported. This study is among the first to highlight a major role for PDAC cEVs to induce stress in treated normal pancreas cells that may modulate a systemic response leading to altered phenotypes. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in mediating disease aetiology and open potential areas of investigation toward understanding the role of cEV lipids in promoting cell transformation in the surrounding microenvironment. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Pancreas cancer Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101/ ANXA5/ CD81/ Alix/ ICAM/ Flotillin1/ EpCAM/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells hTERT-HPNE EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ ANXA5/ EpCAM/ ICAM/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Detected contaminants GM130 Proteomics database Yes: Characterization: Lipid analysis Yes Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 180.8 EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210204	8/12	Homo sapiens	hTERT-HPNE	(d)(U)C Filtration UF qEV	Hinzman CP	2022	78%
Study summary Full title A multi-omics approach identifies pancreatic cancer cell extracellular vesicles as mediators of the unfolded protein response in normal pancreatic epithelial cells. All authors Hinzman CP, Singh B, Bansal S, Li Y, Iliuk A, Girgis M, Herremans KM, Trevino JG, Singh VK, Banerjee PP, Cheema AK Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promotin (show more...)Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promoting cancer progression events, their precise effect on neighbouring normal cells is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of pancreatic cancer ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) derived EVs on recipient non-tumourigenic pancreatic normal epithelial cells upon internalization. We demonstrate that cEVs are readily internalized and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in treated normal pancreatic epithelial cells within 24 h. We further show that PDAC cEVs increase cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and that these changes are regulated at least in part, by the UPR mediator DDIT3. Subsequently, these cells release several inflammatory cytokines. Leveraging a layered multi-omics approach, we analysed EV cargo from a panel of six PDAC and two normal pancreas cell lines, using multiple EV isolation methods. We found that cEVs were enriched for an array of biomolecules which can induce or regulate ER stress and the UPR, including palmitic acid, sphingomyelins, metabolic regulators of tRNA charging and proteins which regulate trafficking and degradation. We further show that palmitic acid, at doses relevant to those found in cEVs, is sufficient to induce ER stress in normal pancreas cells. These results suggest that cEV cargo packaging may be designed to disseminate proliferative and invasive characteristics upon internalization by distant recipient normal cells, hitherto unreported. This study is among the first to highlight a major role for PDAC cEVs to induce stress in treated normal pancreas cells that may modulate a systemic response leading to altered phenotypes. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in mediating disease aetiology and open potential areas of investigation toward understanding the role of cEV lipids in promoting cell transformation in the surrounding microenvironment. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Pancreas cancer Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Filtration Ultrafiltration Commercial method Protein markers EV: TSG101/ ANXA5/ CD81/ Alix/ ICAM/ Flotillin1/ EpCAM/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells hTERT-HPNE EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ ICAM/ EpCAM/ ANXA5/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Detected contaminants GM130 Proteomics database Yes: Characterization: Lipid analysis Yes Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210204	10/12	Homo sapiens	HPDE-H6c7	(d)(U)C Filtration	Hinzman CP	2022	78%
Study summary Full title A multi-omics approach identifies pancreatic cancer cell extracellular vesicles as mediators of the unfolded protein response in normal pancreatic epithelial cells. All authors Hinzman CP, Singh B, Bansal S, Li Y, Iliuk A, Girgis M, Herremans KM, Trevino JG, Singh VK, Banerjee PP, Cheema AK Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promotin (show more...)Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promoting cancer progression events, their precise effect on neighbouring normal cells is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of pancreatic cancer ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) derived EVs on recipient non-tumourigenic pancreatic normal epithelial cells upon internalization. We demonstrate that cEVs are readily internalized and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in treated normal pancreatic epithelial cells within 24 h. We further show that PDAC cEVs increase cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and that these changes are regulated at least in part, by the UPR mediator DDIT3. Subsequently, these cells release several inflammatory cytokines. Leveraging a layered multi-omics approach, we analysed EV cargo from a panel of six PDAC and two normal pancreas cell lines, using multiple EV isolation methods. We found that cEVs were enriched for an array of biomolecules which can induce or regulate ER stress and the UPR, including palmitic acid, sphingomyelins, metabolic regulators of tRNA charging and proteins which regulate trafficking and degradation. We further show that palmitic acid, at doses relevant to those found in cEVs, is sufficient to induce ER stress in normal pancreas cells. These results suggest that cEV cargo packaging may be designed to disseminate proliferative and invasive characteristics upon internalization by distant recipient normal cells, hitherto unreported. This study is among the first to highlight a major role for PDAC cEVs to induce stress in treated normal pancreas cells that may modulate a systemic response leading to altered phenotypes. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in mediating disease aetiology and open potential areas of investigation toward understanding the role of cEV lipids in promoting cell transformation in the surrounding microenvironment. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Pancreas cancer Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Filtration Protein markers EV: TSG101/ ANXA5/ CD81/ Alix/ ICAM/ Flotillin1/ EpCAM/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells HPDE-H6c7 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ ANXA5/ EpCAM/ ICAM/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Detected contaminants GM130 Proteomics database Yes: Characterization: Lipid analysis Yes Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 180.8 EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210204	11/12	Homo sapiens	HPDE-H6c7	(d)(U)C Filtration UF qEV	Hinzman CP	2022	78%
Study summary Full title A multi-omics approach identifies pancreatic cancer cell extracellular vesicles as mediators of the unfolded protein response in normal pancreatic epithelial cells. All authors Hinzman CP, Singh B, Bansal S, Li Y, Iliuk A, Girgis M, Herremans KM, Trevino JG, Singh VK, Banerjee PP, Cheema AK Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promotin (show more...)Although cancer-derived extracellular vesicles (cEVs) are thought to play a pivotal role in promoting cancer progression events, their precise effect on neighbouring normal cells is unknown. In this study, we investigated the impact of pancreatic cancer ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) derived EVs on recipient non-tumourigenic pancreatic normal epithelial cells upon internalization. We demonstrate that cEVs are readily internalized and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in treated normal pancreatic epithelial cells within 24 h. We further show that PDAC cEVs increase cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and that these changes are regulated at least in part, by the UPR mediator DDIT3. Subsequently, these cells release several inflammatory cytokines. Leveraging a layered multi-omics approach, we analysed EV cargo from a panel of six PDAC and two normal pancreas cell lines, using multiple EV isolation methods. We found that cEVs were enriched for an array of biomolecules which can induce or regulate ER stress and the UPR, including palmitic acid, sphingomyelins, metabolic regulators of tRNA charging and proteins which regulate trafficking and degradation. We further show that palmitic acid, at doses relevant to those found in cEVs, is sufficient to induce ER stress in normal pancreas cells. These results suggest that cEV cargo packaging may be designed to disseminate proliferative and invasive characteristics upon internalization by distant recipient normal cells, hitherto unreported. This study is among the first to highlight a major role for PDAC cEVs to induce stress in treated normal pancreas cells that may modulate a systemic response leading to altered phenotypes. These findings highlight the importance of EVs in mediating disease aetiology and open potential areas of investigation toward understanding the role of cEV lipids in promoting cell transformation in the surrounding microenvironment. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Pancreas cancer Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Filtration Ultrafiltration Commercial method Protein markers EV: TSG101/ ANXA5/ CD81/ Alix/ ICAM/ Flotillin1/ EpCAM/ CD63 non-EV: GM130 Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells HPDE-H6c7 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Commercial EDS Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type SW 28 Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Ultra filtration Cut-off size (kDa) 100 Membrane type Regenerated cellulose Commercial kit qEV Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ CD63/ ICAM/ EpCAM/ ANXA5/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Detected contaminants GM130 Proteomics database Yes: Characterization: Lipid analysis Yes Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Not Reported EV concentration Yes EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV220305	1/2	Homo sapiens	Wharton's Jelly mesenchymal stem cell	(d)(U)C	Ngo NH	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Transformed extracellular vesicles with high angiogenic ability as therapeutics of distal ischemic tissues. All authors Ngo NH, Chang YH, Vuong CK, Yamashita T, Obata-Yasuoka M, Hamada H, Osaka M, Hiramatsu Y, Ohneda O Journal Front Cell Dev Biol Abstract The therapeutic effects of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in neovascularization have been sugges (show more...)The therapeutic effects of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in neovascularization have been suggested/ however, to date, few studies have been conducted on the ability of EPC-derived extracellular vesicles (EV) to rescue the ischemic tissues. In order to examine the functional sources of EV for cell-free therapy of ischemic diseases, we compared the functions of EPC-EV and those of Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cell (WJ-EV) in the flap mouse model. Our results demonstrated that in the intravenous injection, EPC-EV, but not WJ-EV, were uptaken by the ischemic tissues. However, EPC-EV showed poor abilities to induce neovascularization and the recovery of ischemic tissues. In addition, compared to EPC-EV, WJ-EV showed a higher ability to rescue the ischemic injury when being locally injected into the mice. In order to induce the secretion of high-functional EPC-EV, EPC were internalized with hypoxic pre-treated WJ-EV, which resulted in a transformed hwEPC. In comparison to EPC, hwEPC showed induced proliferation and upregulation of angiogenic genes and miRNAs and promoted angiogenic ability. Interestingly, hwEPC produced a modified EV (hwEPC-EV) that highly expressed miRNAs related to angiogenesis, such as miR-155, miR-183, and miR-296. Moreover, hwEPC-EV significantly induced the neovascularization of the ischemic tissues which were involved in promoting the proliferation, the expression of VEGF and miR-183, and the angiogenic functions of endothelial cells. Of note, hwEPC-EV were highly uptaken by the ischemic tissues and showed a greater effect with regard to inducing recovery from ischemic injury in the intravenous administration, compared to EPC-EV. Therefore, hwEPC-EV can be considered a functional candidate for cell-free therapy to treat the distal ischemic tissues. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Hypoxia Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: TSG101/ CD40/ integrin beta-1 non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells Wharton's Jelly mesenchymal stem cell EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Cell viability (%) 99.9 Cell count 1000000 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 70 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 140000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 35 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type Type 70 Ti Wash: speed (g) 140000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Bradford Protein Yield (µg) per million cells Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TSG101/ CD40/ integrin beta-1 Not detected contaminants ApoA1 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis DLS Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 0-1000 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV220305	2/2	Homo sapiens	endothelial progenitor cell	(d)(U)C	Ngo NH	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Transformed extracellular vesicles with high angiogenic ability as therapeutics of distal ischemic tissues. All authors Ngo NH, Chang YH, Vuong CK, Yamashita T, Obata-Yasuoka M, Hamada H, Osaka M, Hiramatsu Y, Ohneda O Journal Front Cell Dev Biol Abstract The therapeutic effects of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in neovascularization have been sugges (show more...)The therapeutic effects of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in neovascularization have been suggested/ however, to date, few studies have been conducted on the ability of EPC-derived extracellular vesicles (EV) to rescue the ischemic tissues. In order to examine the functional sources of EV for cell-free therapy of ischemic diseases, we compared the functions of EPC-EV and those of Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cell (WJ-EV) in the flap mouse model. Our results demonstrated that in the intravenous injection, EPC-EV, but not WJ-EV, were uptaken by the ischemic tissues. However, EPC-EV showed poor abilities to induce neovascularization and the recovery of ischemic tissues. In addition, compared to EPC-EV, WJ-EV showed a higher ability to rescue the ischemic injury when being locally injected into the mice. In order to induce the secretion of high-functional EPC-EV, EPC were internalized with hypoxic pre-treated WJ-EV, which resulted in a transformed hwEPC. In comparison to EPC, hwEPC showed induced proliferation and upregulation of angiogenic genes and miRNAs and promoted angiogenic ability. Interestingly, hwEPC produced a modified EV (hwEPC-EV) that highly expressed miRNAs related to angiogenesis, such as miR-155, miR-183, and miR-296. Moreover, hwEPC-EV significantly induced the neovascularization of the ischemic tissues which were involved in promoting the proliferation, the expression of VEGF and miR-183, and the angiogenic functions of endothelial cells. Of note, hwEPC-EV were highly uptaken by the ischemic tissues and showed a greater effect with regard to inducing recovery from ischemic injury in the intravenous administration, compared to EPC-EV. Therefore, hwEPC-EV can be considered a functional candidate for cell-free therapy to treat the distal ischemic tissues. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin treated with Hypoxia WJ-MSC derived EV Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: TSG101/ CD40/ Integrin beta-1 non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells endothelial progenitor cell EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Cell viability (%) 99.9 Cell count 1000000 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 70 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 140000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 35 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type Type 70 Ti Wash: speed (g) 140000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Bradford Protein Yield (µg) per million cells Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TSG101/ CD40/ integrin beta-1 Not detected contaminants ApoA1 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)-(q)PCR Proteinase treatment Yes Moment of Proteinase treatment After Proteinase type Proteinase K Proteinase concentration 500 RNAse treatment Yes RNAse type RNase A RNAse concentration 0.01 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis DLS Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 0-1000 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV190029	1/8	Homo sapiens	DLD-1	(d)(U)C	Bhome R	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Epithelial to mesenchymal transition influences fibroblast phenotype in colorectal cancer by altering miR-200 levels in extracellular vesicles. All authors Bhome R, Emaduddin M, James V, House LM, Thirdborough SM, Mellone M, Tulkens J, Primrose JN, Thomas GJ, De Wever O, Mirnezami AH, Sayan AE Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for (show more...)Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for distant metastasis and is characterised by the accumulation of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the stroma. We investigated whether the epithelial to mesenchymal transition status of CRC cells influences fibroblast phenotype, with a focus on the transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs), as a controlled means of cell-cell communication. Epithelial CRC EVs suppressed TGF-β-driven myofibroblast differentiation, whereas mesenchymal CRC EVs did not. This was driven by miR-200 (miR-200a/b/c, -141), which was enriched in epithelial CRC EVs and transferred to recipient fibroblasts. Ectopic miR-200 expression or ZEB1 knockdown, in fibroblasts, similarly suppressed myofibroblast differentiation. Supporting these findings, there was a strong negative correlation between miR-200 and myofibroblastic markers in a cohort of CRC patients in the TCGA dataset. This was replicated in mice, by co-injecting epithelial or mesenchymal CRC cells with fibroblasts and analysing stromal markers of myofibroblastic phenotype. Fibroblasts from epithelial tumours contained more miR-200 and expressed less ACTA2 and FN1 than those from mesenchymal tumours. As such, these data provide a new mechanism for the development of fibroblast heterogeneity in CRC, through EV-mediated transfer of miRNAs, and provide an explanation as to why CRC tumours with greater metastatic potential are CAF rich. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells DLD-1 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type TFT 50.38 Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 20 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type TFT 50.38 Wash: speed (g) 100000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Not detected contaminants cytochrome c/ GM130 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)(q)PCR Database Yes Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 110 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV190029	2/8	Homo sapiens	HCT-116	(d)(U)C	Bhome R	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Epithelial to mesenchymal transition influences fibroblast phenotype in colorectal cancer by altering miR-200 levels in extracellular vesicles. All authors Bhome R, Emaduddin M, James V, House LM, Thirdborough SM, Mellone M, Tulkens J, Primrose JN, Thomas GJ, De Wever O, Mirnezami AH, Sayan AE Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for (show more...)Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for distant metastasis and is characterised by the accumulation of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the stroma. We investigated whether the epithelial to mesenchymal transition status of CRC cells influences fibroblast phenotype, with a focus on the transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs), as a controlled means of cell-cell communication. Epithelial CRC EVs suppressed TGF-β-driven myofibroblast differentiation, whereas mesenchymal CRC EVs did not. This was driven by miR-200 (miR-200a/b/c, -141), which was enriched in epithelial CRC EVs and transferred to recipient fibroblasts. Ectopic miR-200 expression or ZEB1 knockdown, in fibroblasts, similarly suppressed myofibroblast differentiation. Supporting these findings, there was a strong negative correlation between miR-200 and myofibroblastic markers in a cohort of CRC patients in the TCGA dataset. This was replicated in mice, by co-injecting epithelial or mesenchymal CRC cells with fibroblasts and analysing stromal markers of myofibroblastic phenotype. Fibroblasts from epithelial tumours contained more miR-200 and expressed less ACTA2 and FN1 than those from mesenchymal tumours. As such, these data provide a new mechanism for the development of fibroblast heterogeneity in CRC, through EV-mediated transfer of miRNAs, and provide an explanation as to why CRC tumours with greater metastatic potential are CAF rich. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells HCT-116 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type TFT 50.38 Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 20 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type TFT 50.38 Wash: speed (g) 100000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD63/ TSG101/ CD81 Not detected contaminants cytochrome c/ GM130 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)(q)PCR Database Yes Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 98 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV190029	3/8	Homo sapiens	SW620	(d)(U)C	Bhome R	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Epithelial to mesenchymal transition influences fibroblast phenotype in colorectal cancer by altering miR-200 levels in extracellular vesicles. All authors Bhome R, Emaduddin M, James V, House LM, Thirdborough SM, Mellone M, Tulkens J, Primrose JN, Thomas GJ, De Wever O, Mirnezami AH, Sayan AE Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for (show more...)Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for distant metastasis and is characterised by the accumulation of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the stroma. We investigated whether the epithelial to mesenchymal transition status of CRC cells influences fibroblast phenotype, with a focus on the transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs), as a controlled means of cell-cell communication. Epithelial CRC EVs suppressed TGF-β-driven myofibroblast differentiation, whereas mesenchymal CRC EVs did not. This was driven by miR-200 (miR-200a/b/c, -141), which was enriched in epithelial CRC EVs and transferred to recipient fibroblasts. Ectopic miR-200 expression or ZEB1 knockdown, in fibroblasts, similarly suppressed myofibroblast differentiation. Supporting these findings, there was a strong negative correlation between miR-200 and myofibroblastic markers in a cohort of CRC patients in the TCGA dataset. This was replicated in mice, by co-injecting epithelial or mesenchymal CRC cells with fibroblasts and analysing stromal markers of myofibroblastic phenotype. Fibroblasts from epithelial tumours contained more miR-200 and expressed less ACTA2 and FN1 than those from mesenchymal tumours. As such, these data provide a new mechanism for the development of fibroblast heterogeneity in CRC, through EV-mediated transfer of miRNAs, and provide an explanation as to why CRC tumours with greater metastatic potential are CAF rich. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells SW620 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type TFT 50.38 Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 20 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type TFT 50.38 Wash: speed (g) 100000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD63/ TSG101/ CD81 Not detected contaminants cytochrome c/ GM130 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)(q)PCR Database Yes Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 115 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV190029	4/8	Homo sapiens	SW480	(d)(U)C	Bhome R	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Epithelial to mesenchymal transition influences fibroblast phenotype in colorectal cancer by altering miR-200 levels in extracellular vesicles. All authors Bhome R, Emaduddin M, James V, House LM, Thirdborough SM, Mellone M, Tulkens J, Primrose JN, Thomas GJ, De Wever O, Mirnezami AH, Sayan AE Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for (show more...)Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for distant metastasis and is characterised by the accumulation of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the stroma. We investigated whether the epithelial to mesenchymal transition status of CRC cells influences fibroblast phenotype, with a focus on the transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs), as a controlled means of cell-cell communication. Epithelial CRC EVs suppressed TGF-β-driven myofibroblast differentiation, whereas mesenchymal CRC EVs did not. This was driven by miR-200 (miR-200a/b/c, -141), which was enriched in epithelial CRC EVs and transferred to recipient fibroblasts. Ectopic miR-200 expression or ZEB1 knockdown, in fibroblasts, similarly suppressed myofibroblast differentiation. Supporting these findings, there was a strong negative correlation between miR-200 and myofibroblastic markers in a cohort of CRC patients in the TCGA dataset. This was replicated in mice, by co-injecting epithelial or mesenchymal CRC cells with fibroblasts and analysing stromal markers of myofibroblastic phenotype. Fibroblasts from epithelial tumours contained more miR-200 and expressed less ACTA2 and FN1 than those from mesenchymal tumours. As such, these data provide a new mechanism for the development of fibroblast heterogeneity in CRC, through EV-mediated transfer of miRNAs, and provide an explanation as to why CRC tumours with greater metastatic potential are CAF rich. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells SW480 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type TFT 50.38 Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 20 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type TFT 50.38 Wash: speed (g) 100000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD63/ TSG101/ CD81 Not detected contaminants cytochrome c/ GM130 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)(q)PCR Database Yes Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 124 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV190029	5/8	Homo sapiens	SW480	(d)(U)C	Bhome R	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Epithelial to mesenchymal transition influences fibroblast phenotype in colorectal cancer by altering miR-200 levels in extracellular vesicles. All authors Bhome R, Emaduddin M, James V, House LM, Thirdborough SM, Mellone M, Tulkens J, Primrose JN, Thomas GJ, De Wever O, Mirnezami AH, Sayan AE Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for (show more...)Colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mesenchymal gene expression signature has the greatest propensity for distant metastasis and is characterised by the accumulation of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the stroma. We investigated whether the epithelial to mesenchymal transition status of CRC cells influences fibroblast phenotype, with a focus on the transfer of extracellular vesicles (EVs), as a controlled means of cell-cell communication. Epithelial CRC EVs suppressed TGF-β-driven myofibroblast differentiation, whereas mesenchymal CRC EVs did not. This was driven by miR-200 (miR-200a/b/c, -141), which was enriched in epithelial CRC EVs and transferred to recipient fibroblasts. Ectopic miR-200 expression or ZEB1 knockdown, in fibroblasts, similarly suppressed myofibroblast differentiation. Supporting these findings, there was a strong negative correlation between miR-200 and myofibroblastic markers in a cohort of CRC patients in the TCGA dataset. This was replicated in mice, by co-injecting epithelial or mesenchymal CRC cells with fibroblasts and analysing stromal markers of myofibroblastic phenotype. Fibroblasts from epithelial tumours contained more miR-200 and expressed less ACTA2 and FN1 than those from mesenchymal tumours. As such, these data provide a new mechanism for the development of fibroblast heterogeneity in CRC, through EV-mediated transfer of miRNAs, and provide an explanation as to why CRC tumours with greater metastatic potential are CAF rich. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin ZEB-1 knock down Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells SW480 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS >=18h at >= 100,000g Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type TFT 50.38 Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 20 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type TFT 50.38 Wash: speed (g) 100000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ TSG101/ Alix/ CD81 Not detected contaminants cytochrome c/ GM130 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type (RT)(q)PCR Database Yes Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 105 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV220177	2/6	Homo sapiens	MDAMB231	(d)(U)C	Pachane BC	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Small Extracellular Vesicles from Hypoxic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Induce Oxygen-Dependent Cell Invasion. All authors Pachane BC, Nunes ACC, Cataldi TR, Micocci KC, Moreira BC, Labate CA, Selistre-de-Araujo HS, Altei WF Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Hypoxia, a condition of low oxygenation frequently found in triple-negative breast tumors (TNBC), pr (show more...)Hypoxia, a condition of low oxygenation frequently found in triple-negative breast tumors (TNBC), promotes extracellular vesicle (EV) secretion and favors cell invasion, a complex process in which cell morphology is altered, dynamic focal adhesion spots are created, and ECM is remodeled. Here, we investigated the invasive properties triggered by TNBC-derived hypoxic small EV (SEVh) in vitro in cells cultured under hypoxic (1% O) and normoxic (20% O) conditions, using phenotypical and proteomic approaches. SEVh characterization demonstrated increased protein abundance and diversity over normoxic SEV (SEVn), with enrichment in pro-invasive pathways. In normoxic cells, SEVh promotes invasive behavior through pro-migratory morphology, invadopodia development, ECM degradation, and matrix metalloprotease (MMP) secretion. The proteome profiling of 20% O-cultured cells exposed to SEVh determined enrichment in metabolic processes and cell cycles, modulating cell health to escape apoptotic pathways. In hypoxia, SEVh was responsible for proteolytic and catabolic pathway inducement, interfering with integrin availability and gelatinase expression. Overall, our results demonstrate the importance of hypoxic signaling via SEV in tumors for the early establishment of metastasis. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Normoxia (20% O2) Focus vesicles medium extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD63/ Flotillin-1 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDAMB231 EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 96 Cell count 1.50E+08 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 10,000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 4 Wash: time (min) 30 Wash: Rotor Type Type 45 Ti Wash: speed (g) 10,000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Protein Yield (µg) per milliliter of starting sample Western Blot Not detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD63/ Flotillin-1 Not detected contaminants Calnexin Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 243 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 5.23E+10 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV220177	3/6	Homo sapiens	MDAMB231	(d)(U)C	Pachane BC	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Small Extracellular Vesicles from Hypoxic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Induce Oxygen-Dependent Cell Invasion. All authors Pachane BC, Nunes ACC, Cataldi TR, Micocci KC, Moreira BC, Labate CA, Selistre-de-Araujo HS, Altei WF Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Hypoxia, a condition of low oxygenation frequently found in triple-negative breast tumors (TNBC), pr (show more...)Hypoxia, a condition of low oxygenation frequently found in triple-negative breast tumors (TNBC), promotes extracellular vesicle (EV) secretion and favors cell invasion, a complex process in which cell morphology is altered, dynamic focal adhesion spots are created, and ECM is remodeled. Here, we investigated the invasive properties triggered by TNBC-derived hypoxic small EV (SEVh) in vitro in cells cultured under hypoxic (1% O) and normoxic (20% O) conditions, using phenotypical and proteomic approaches. SEVh characterization demonstrated increased protein abundance and diversity over normoxic SEV (SEVn), with enrichment in pro-invasive pathways. In normoxic cells, SEVh promotes invasive behavior through pro-migratory morphology, invadopodia development, ECM degradation, and matrix metalloprotease (MMP) secretion. The proteome profiling of 20% O-cultured cells exposed to SEVh determined enrichment in metabolic processes and cell cycles, modulating cell health to escape apoptotic pathways. In hypoxia, SEVh was responsible for proteolytic and catabolic pathway inducement, interfering with integrin availability and gelatinase expression. Overall, our results demonstrate the importance of hypoxic signaling via SEV in tumors for the early establishment of metastasis. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Normoxia (20% O2) Focus vesicles small extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD63/ Flotillin-1 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDAMB231 EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 96 Cell count 1.50E+08 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Equal to or above 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 150,000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 4 Wash: time (min) 120 Wash: Rotor Type Type 45 Ti Wash: speed (g) 150,000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Protein Yield (µg) per milliliter of starting sample Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD63/ Flotillin-1 Not detected contaminants Calnexin Proteomics database PRIDE Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 136 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 1.62E+12 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV220177	5/6	Homo sapiens	MDAMB231	(d)(U)C	Pachane BC	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Small Extracellular Vesicles from Hypoxic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Induce Oxygen-Dependent Cell Invasion. All authors Pachane BC, Nunes ACC, Cataldi TR, Micocci KC, Moreira BC, Labate CA, Selistre-de-Araujo HS, Altei WF Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Hypoxia, a condition of low oxygenation frequently found in triple-negative breast tumors (TNBC), pr (show more...)Hypoxia, a condition of low oxygenation frequently found in triple-negative breast tumors (TNBC), promotes extracellular vesicle (EV) secretion and favors cell invasion, a complex process in which cell morphology is altered, dynamic focal adhesion spots are created, and ECM is remodeled. Here, we investigated the invasive properties triggered by TNBC-derived hypoxic small EV (SEVh) in vitro in cells cultured under hypoxic (1% O) and normoxic (20% O) conditions, using phenotypical and proteomic approaches. SEVh characterization demonstrated increased protein abundance and diversity over normoxic SEV (SEVn), with enrichment in pro-invasive pathways. In normoxic cells, SEVh promotes invasive behavior through pro-migratory morphology, invadopodia development, ECM degradation, and matrix metalloprotease (MMP) secretion. The proteome profiling of 20% O-cultured cells exposed to SEVh determined enrichment in metabolic processes and cell cycles, modulating cell health to escape apoptotic pathways. In hypoxia, SEVh was responsible for proteolytic and catabolic pathway inducement, interfering with integrin availability and gelatinase expression. Overall, our results demonstrate the importance of hypoxic signaling via SEV in tumors for the early establishment of metastasis. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Hypoxia (1% O2) Focus vesicles medium extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: Flotillin-1/ Alix/ CD63 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDAMB231 EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 96 Cell count 1.50E+08 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 10,000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 4 Wash: time (min) 30 Wash: Rotor Type Type 45 Ti Wash: speed (g) 10,000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Protein Yield (µg) per milliliter of starting sample Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin-1/ CD63 Not detected EV-associated proteins Alix Not detected contaminants Calnexin Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 243 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 1.14E+12 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV220177	6/6	Homo sapiens	MDAMB231	(d)(U)C	Pachane BC	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Small Extracellular Vesicles from Hypoxic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Induce Oxygen-Dependent Cell Invasion. All authors Pachane BC, Nunes ACC, Cataldi TR, Micocci KC, Moreira BC, Labate CA, Selistre-de-Araujo HS, Altei WF Journal Int J Mol Sci Abstract Hypoxia, a condition of low oxygenation frequently found in triple-negative breast tumors (TNBC), pr (show more...)Hypoxia, a condition of low oxygenation frequently found in triple-negative breast tumors (TNBC), promotes extracellular vesicle (EV) secretion and favors cell invasion, a complex process in which cell morphology is altered, dynamic focal adhesion spots are created, and ECM is remodeled. Here, we investigated the invasive properties triggered by TNBC-derived hypoxic small EV (SEVh) in vitro in cells cultured under hypoxic (1% O) and normoxic (20% O) conditions, using phenotypical and proteomic approaches. SEVh characterization demonstrated increased protein abundance and diversity over normoxic SEV (SEVn), with enrichment in pro-invasive pathways. In normoxic cells, SEVh promotes invasive behavior through pro-migratory morphology, invadopodia development, ECM degradation, and matrix metalloprotease (MMP) secretion. The proteome profiling of 20% O-cultured cells exposed to SEVh determined enrichment in metabolic processes and cell cycles, modulating cell health to escape apoptotic pathways. In hypoxia, SEVh was responsible for proteolytic and catabolic pathway inducement, interfering with integrin availability and gelatinase expression. Overall, our results demonstrate the importance of hypoxic signaling via SEV in tumors for the early establishment of metastasis. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Hypoxia (1% O2) Focus vesicles small extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: Flotillin-1/ Alix/ CD63 non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics yes Show all info Study aim Function/Identification of content (omics approaches) Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDAMB231 EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 96 Cell count 1.50E+08 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Equal to or above 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 150,000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 4 Wash: time (min) 120 Wash: Rotor Type Type 45 Ti Wash: speed (g) 150,000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method microBCA Protein Yield (µg) per milliliter of starting sample Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin-1/ CD63 Not detected EV-associated proteins Alix Not detected contaminants Calnexin Proteomics database PRIDE Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Modus Reported size (nm) 150 EV concentration Yes Particle yield as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample: 2.03E+12 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV210345	1/17	Homo sapiens	Expi293F	(d)(U)C	Osteikoetxea X	2022	78%
Study summary Full title Engineered Cas9 extracellular vesicles as a novel gene editing tool. All authors Osteikoetxea X, Silva A, Lázaro-Ibáñez E, Salmond N, Shatnyeva O, Stein J, Schick J, Wren S, Lindgren J, Firth M, Madsen A, Mayr LM, Overman R, Davies R, Dekker N Journal J Extracell Vesicles Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have shown promise as biological delivery vehicles, but therapeutic app (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have shown promise as biological delivery vehicles, but therapeutic applications require efficient cargo loading. Here, we developed new methods for CRISPR/Cas9 loading into EVs through reversible heterodimerization of Cas9-fusions with EV sorting partners. Cas9-loaded EVs were collected from engineered Expi293F cells using standard methodology, characterized using nanoparticle tracking analysis, western blotting, and transmission electron microscopy and analysed for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated functional gene editing in a Cre-reporter cellular assay. Light-induced dimerization using Cryptochrome 2 combined with CD9 or a Myristoylation-Palmitoylation-Palmitoylation lipid modification resulted in efficient loading with approximately 25 Cas9 molecules per EV and high functional delivery with 51% gene editing of the Cre reporter cassette in HEK293 and 25% in HepG2 cells, respectively. This approach was also effective for targeting knock-down of the therapeutically relevant PCSK9 gene with 6% indel efficiency in HEK293. Cas9 transfer was detergent-sensitive and associated with the EV fractions after size exclusion chromatography, indicative of EV-mediated transfer. Considering the advantages of EVs over other delivery vectors we envision that this study will prove useful for a range of therapeutic applications, including CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation Protein markers EV: Alix/ CD63/ CD81/ Flotillin1/ TSG101/ syntenin-1/ B-actin non-EV: Calnexin Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function/Drug delivery Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells Expi293F EV-harvesting Medium Serum free medium Cell viability (%) 95.4 Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 70 Pelleting: rotor type SW 32 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 100000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 38 Wash: time (min) 70 Wash: Rotor Type SW 32 Ti Wash: speed (g) 100000 Size-exclusion chromatography Resin type Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Nanodrop Protein Yield (µg) number of particles per million cells Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ CD63/ CD81/ Flotillin1/ TSG101/ syntenin-1/ B-actin Detected contaminants Calnexin Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 120 EV concentration Yes Particle yield number of particles per million cells: 4.00e+4 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

				1 - 50 of 669

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data