Search > Results

You searched for: EV210087 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV210087 1/2 Equus caballus Adipose-derived stem cells PureExo (101Bio) Marędziak, Monika 2014 25%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Monika Marędziak, Krzysztof Marycz, Daniel Lewandowski, Anna Siudzińska, Agnieszka Śmieszek
Journal
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim.
Abstract
The aim of this work study was to evaluate the cytophysiological activity of equine adipose-derived (show more...)The aim of this work study was to evaluate the cytophysiological activity of equine adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) cultured under conditions of static magnetic field. Investigated cells were exposed to a static magnetic field (MF) with the intensity of 0.5 T. In order to investigate the effects of magnetic field on stem cell signaling, the localization and density and content of microvesicles (MVs) as well as morphology, ultrastructure, and proliferation rate of equine ASCs were evaluated. Results showed that potential of equine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells was accelerated when magnetic field was applied. Resazurin-based assay indicated that the cells cultured in the magnetic field reached the population doubling time earlier and colony-forming potential of equine ASCs was higher when cells were cultured under magnetic field conditions. Morphological and ultrastructural examination of equine ASCs showed that the exposure to magnetic field did not cause any significant changes in cell morphology whereas the polarity of the cells was observed under the magnetic field conditions in ultrastructural examinations. Exposition to MF resulted in a considerable increase in the number of secreted MVs-we have clearly observed the differences between the numbers of MVs shed from the cells cultured under MF in comparison to the control culture and were rich in growth factors. Microvesicles derived from ASCs cultured in the MF condition might be utilized in the stem cell-based treatment of equine musculoskeletal disorders and tendon injuries. (hide)
EV-METRIC
25% (64th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
(shedding) microvesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
PureExo (101Bio)
Protein markers
EV: BMP2/ TNF-/ p53/ VEGF
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Equus caballus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Adipose-derived stem cells
EV-harvesting Medium
Not specified
Separation Method
Commercial kit
PureExo (101Bio)
Other
Name other separation method
PureExo (101Bio)
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
BMP2/ TNF-/ p53/ VEGF
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
EM
EM-type
Scanning-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
EV concentration
Yes
EV210087 2/2 Equus caballus Adipose-derived stem cells PureExo (101Bio) Marędziak, Monika 2014 25%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Monika Marędziak, Krzysztof Marycz, Daniel Lewandowski, Anna Siudzińska, Agnieszka Śmieszek
Journal
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim.
Abstract
The aim of this work study was to evaluate the cytophysiological activity of equine adipose-derived (show more...)The aim of this work study was to evaluate the cytophysiological activity of equine adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) cultured under conditions of static magnetic field. Investigated cells were exposed to a static magnetic field (MF) with the intensity of 0.5 T. In order to investigate the effects of magnetic field on stem cell signaling, the localization and density and content of microvesicles (MVs) as well as morphology, ultrastructure, and proliferation rate of equine ASCs were evaluated. Results showed that potential of equine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells was accelerated when magnetic field was applied. Resazurin-based assay indicated that the cells cultured in the magnetic field reached the population doubling time earlier and colony-forming potential of equine ASCs was higher when cells were cultured under magnetic field conditions. Morphological and ultrastructural examination of equine ASCs showed that the exposure to magnetic field did not cause any significant changes in cell morphology whereas the polarity of the cells was observed under the magnetic field conditions in ultrastructural examinations. Exposition to MF resulted in a considerable increase in the number of secreted MVs-we have clearly observed the differences between the numbers of MVs shed from the cells cultured under MF in comparison to the control culture and were rich in growth factors. Microvesicles derived from ASCs cultured in the MF condition might be utilized in the stem cell-based treatment of equine musculoskeletal disorders and tendon injuries. (hide)
EV-METRIC
25% (64th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Static magnetic field
Focus vesicles
(shedding) microvesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
PureExo (101Bio)
Protein markers
EV: BMP2/ TNF-/ p53/ VEGF
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Equus caballus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Adipose-derived stem cells
EV-harvesting Medium
Not specified
Separation Method
Commercial kit
PureExo (101Bio)
Other
Name other separation method
PureExo (101Bio)
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
BMP2/ TNF-/ p53/ VEGF
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
EM
EM-type
Scanning-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
EV concentration
Yes
1 - 2 of 2
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV210087
species
Equus caballus
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
Adipose-derived
stem cells
condition
Control condition
Static
magnetic field
separation protocol
PureExo (101Bio)
PureExo (101Bio)
Exp. nr.
1
2
EV-METRIC %
25
25