Search > Results

You searched for: EV200089 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV200089 1/1 Homo sapiens red blood cells (d)(U)C
DC
Filtration
Zhang, Gensheng; Huang, Xiaofa 2020 67%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Gensheng Zhang, Xiaofang Huang, Huiqing Xiu, Yan Sun, Jiming Chen, Guoping Cheng, Zhengbo Song, Yanmei Peng, Yingying Shen, Jianli Wang, Zhijian Cai
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are excellent potential vectors for the delivery of therapeutic drugs. (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are excellent potential vectors for the delivery of therapeutic drugs. However, issues with biological safety and disease targeting substantially limit their clinical application. EVs from red blood cells (RBC‐EVs) are potential drug delivery vehicles because of their unique biological safety. Here, we demonstrated that EVs, including RBC‐EVs, show natural liver accumulation. Mechanistically, the liver environment induces macrophages to phagocytize RBC‐EVs in a C1q‐dependent manner. RBC‐EVs loaded with antisense oligonucleotides of microRNA‐155 showed macrophage‐dependent protective effects against acute liver failure (ALF) in a mouse model. These RBC‐EVs were also effective in treatment of ALF. Furthermore, compared to routine doses of doxorubicin and sorafenib (SRF), RBC‐EVs loaded with doxorubicin or SRF showed enhanced therapeutic effects on a murine model of orthotopic liver cancer through a mechanism dependent on macrophages. Importantly, drug‐loaded RBC‐EVs showed no systemic toxicity at therapeutically effective doses, whereas routine doses of doxorubicin and SRF showed obvious toxicity. Thus, drug‐loaded RBC‐EVs hold high potential for clinical applications in the treatment of liver disease therapy. (hide)
EV-METRIC
67% (50th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
red blood cells
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
DC
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ HSP70/ Alix
non-EV: ARF6
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biomarker/Mechanism of uptake/transfer
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
red blood cells
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
35
Wash: time (min)
70
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 32 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
100000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Density cushion
Density medium
Sucrose
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
Yes
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Lysis buffer provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
TSG101/ HSP70/ Alix
Not detected contaminants
ARF6
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Other
Reported size (nm)
154+/-51
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
Yes, as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample 1.84E+12
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up
Report size (nm)
150-200
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV200089
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
red blood cells
condition
Control condition
separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DC
Filtration
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
67