EV-TRACK

Search > Results

You searched for: EV140282 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2

Results list Study Tree

Details	EV-TRACK ID	Experiment nr.	Species	Sample type	Separation protocol	First author	Year	EV-METRIC
	EV140282	1/2	Mus musculus	NAY	(d)(U)C DC Filtration	Saunderson SC	2014	29%
Study summary Full title CD169 mediates the capture of exosomes in spleen and lymph node All authors Saunderson SC, Dunn AC, Crocker PR, McLellan AD Journal Blood Abstract Exosomes are lipid nanovesicles released following fusion of the endosoma limiting membrane with the (show more...)Exosomes are lipid nanovesicles released following fusion of the endosoma limiting membrane with the plasma membrane; however, their fate in lymphoid organs after their release remains controversial. We determined that sialoadhesin (CD169; Siglec-1) is required for the capture of B cell-derived exosomes via their surface-expressed ?2,3-linked sialic acids. Exosome-capturing macrophages were present in the marginal zone of the spleen and in the subcapsular sinus of the lymph node. In vitro assays performed on spleen and lymph node sections confirmed that exosome binding to CD169 was not solely due to preferential fluid flow to these areas. Although the circulation half-life of exosomes in blood of wild-type and CD169(-/-) mice was similar, exosomes displayed altered distribution in CD169(-/-) mice, with exosomes freely accessing the outer marginal zone rim of SIGN-R1(+) macrophages and F4/80(+) red pulp macrophages. In the lymph node, exosomes were not retained in the subcapsular sinus of CD169(-/-) mice but penetrated deeper into the paracortex. Interestingly, CD169(-/-) mice demonstrated an enhanced response to antigen-pulsed exosomes. This is the first report of a role for CD169 in the capture of exosomes and its potential to mediate the immune response to exosomal antigen. (hide) EV-METRIC 29% (68th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin NAY Focus vesicles exosomes Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (d)(U)C DC Filtration Protein markers EV: MHC2/ CD9 non-EV: a2,3-sialic acid/ CD21/ CD24/ CD19/ a2,6-sialic acid/ Ig Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-harvesting Medium EV Depleted Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 60 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Characterization: Protein analysis Western Blot Antibody details provided? No Detected EV-associated proteins MHC2 ELISA Antibody details provided? No Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ MHC2 Detected contaminants "CD19/ CD21/ CD24/ Ig/ a2,3-sialic acid/ a2,6-sialic acid" Flow cytometry specific beads Antibody details provided? No Antibody dilution provided? No Selected surface protein(s) Yes Characterization: Particle analysis EM EM-type transmission EM Image type Wide-field

	EV140282	2/2	Mus musculus	NAY	(d)(U)C DC Filtration	Saunderson SC	2014	0%
Study summary Full title CD169 mediates the capture of exosomes in spleen and lymph node All authors Saunderson SC, Dunn AC, Crocker PR, McLellan AD Journal Blood Abstract Exosomes are lipid nanovesicles released following fusion of the endosoma limiting membrane with the (show more...)Exosomes are lipid nanovesicles released following fusion of the endosoma limiting membrane with the plasma membrane; however, their fate in lymphoid organs after their release remains controversial. We determined that sialoadhesin (CD169; Siglec-1) is required for the capture of B cell-derived exosomes via their surface-expressed ?2,3-linked sialic acids. Exosome-capturing macrophages were present in the marginal zone of the spleen and in the subcapsular sinus of the lymph node. In vitro assays performed on spleen and lymph node sections confirmed that exosome binding to CD169 was not solely due to preferential fluid flow to these areas. Although the circulation half-life of exosomes in blood of wild-type and CD169(-/-) mice was similar, exosomes displayed altered distribution in CD169(-/-) mice, with exosomes freely accessing the outer marginal zone rim of SIGN-R1(+) macrophages and F4/80(+) red pulp macrophages. In the lymph node, exosomes were not retained in the subcapsular sinus of CD169(-/-) mice but penetrated deeper into the paracortex. Interestingly, CD169(-/-) mice demonstrated an enhanced response to antigen-pulsed exosomes. This is the first report of a role for CD169 in the capture of exosomes and its potential to mediate the immune response to exosomal antigen. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin NAY Focus vesicles exosomes Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (d)(U)C DC Filtration Protein markers EV: non-EV: Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-harvesting Medium EV Depleted Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 60 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Characterization: Particle analysis None

				1 - 2 of 2

EV-TRACK ID	EV140282
species	Mus musculus
sample type	Cell culture
cell type	NAY
condition	NAY
separation protocol	(d)(U)C DC Filtration	(d)(U)C DC Filtration
Exp. nr.	1	2
EV-METRIC %	29	0