Search > Results

You searched for: EV130170 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV130170 1/1 Bordetella parapertussis Bacteria (d)(U)C
DC
Bottero D 2013 14%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Bottero D, Gaillard ME, Errea A, Moreno G, Zurita E, Pianciola L, Rumbo M, Hozbor D
Journal
Vaccine
Abstract
Bordetella parapertussis, a close related species of B. pertussis, can also cause the disease named (show more...)Bordetella parapertussis, a close related species of B. pertussis, can also cause the disease named pertussis or whooping cough. The number of cases caused by this related pathogen has risen sustained in the last years. The widely used cellular (wP) or acellular (aP) pertussis vaccines have little or no efficacy against B. parapertussis. In an effort to devise an effective acellular vaccine against B. parapertussis infection, outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) were obtained from B. parapertussis. Proteomic analysis of the resulting OMVs, designated OMVsBpp, evidenced the presence of several surface immunogens including pertactin. The characterized OMVsBpp were used in murine B. parapertussis intranasal challenge model to examine their protective capacity when administered by systemic route. Immunized BALB/c mice were challenged with sublethal doses of B. parapertussis. Significant differences between immunized animals and the negative control group were observed (p<0.001). OMVsBpp protected against B. parapertussis infection, whereas current commercial aP vaccine showed little protection against such pathogen. More interestingly, protection induced by OMVsBpp against B. pertussis was comparable to our previously designed vaccine consisting in OMVs derived from B. pertussis (OMVsBp). For these experiments we used as a positive control the current commercial aP vaccine in high dose. As expected aP offered protection against B. pertussis in mice. Altogether the results presented here showed that the OMVs from B. parapertussis are an attractive vaccine candidate to protect against whooping cough induced by B. parapertussis but also by B. pertussis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
14% (56th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Bacteria
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
OMV
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
DC
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV:
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Bordetella parapertussis
Sample Type
Bacteria
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
120
Characterization: Protein analysis
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV130170
species
Bordetella
parapertussis
sample type
Bacteria
condition
NAY
separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DC
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
14