Search > Results

You searched for: EV120161 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV120161 1/1 Homo sapiens Ascites (d)(U)C Teng H 2012 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Teng H, Hu M, Yuan LX, Liu Y, Guo X, Zhang WJ, Jia RZ
Journal
J Liposome Res
Abstract
Exosomes are small-membrane vesicles secreted by hematopoietic and malignant epithelial cells as wel (show more...)Exosomes are small-membrane vesicles secreted by hematopoietic and malignant epithelial cells as well as trophoblasts. The composition of cancerous exosomes has been proven to play pivotal roles in the maintenance of the microenvironment that is beneficial for the progression of cancer, such as Fas-ligand-triggered lymphocyte apoptosis. We supposed that the immunosuppressive effect of cancerous exosomes might be helpful in the treatment of diseases characterized by overactivation of the immune system and subsequent tissue injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of tumor-derived exosomes in the mice model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation. Tetrazolium (MTT) and DNA electrophoresis were used to measure the cytotoxicity of exosomes on lymphocytes. Pathologic observation of tissue sections, serologic analysis of aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT), and urinary analysis of protein were used to assess the protection effect of exosomes in LPS-induced multiorgan damage. In vitro outcomes of MTT and DNA electrophoresis showed the cytotoxicity of exosomes on lymphocytes. Together with the alleviation of organ damages evaluated by urine protein, serum AST/ALT, and pathologic analysis, we confirmed the possibility that pretreatment of mice with exosomes, produced by H22 hepatic tumor cells, resulted in protection against LPS-induced tissue damage, which is caused by overactivation of the immune system and inflammation response. This therapeutic strategy will raise an interesting way to search new therapeutics in pairs of diseases with complementarities in etiology and pathology, namely, a strategy of taking advantage of the mutual complementarities between diseases. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 13% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Ascites
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV:
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Ascites
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV120161
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Ascites
condition
NAY
separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
0