EV-TRACK

Search > Results

You searched for: EV120098 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2

Results list Study Tree

Details	EV-TRACK ID	Experiment nr.	Species	Sample type	Separation protocol	First author	Year	EV-METRIC
	EV120098	1/2	Mus musculus	Blood plasma	(d)(U)C IAF	Yang C	2012	11%
Study summary Full title Plasma-derived MHC class II+ exosomes from tumor-bearing mice suppress tumor antigen-specific immune responses All authors Yang C, Ruffner MA, Kim SH, Robbins PD Journal Eur J Immunol Abstract Tumor-specific immunosuppression is frequently observed in tumor-bearing hosts. Exosomes are nano-si (show more...)Tumor-specific immunosuppression is frequently observed in tumor-bearing hosts. Exosomes are nano-sized, endosomal-derived membrane vesicles secreted by most tumor and hematopoietic cells and have been shown to actively participate in immune regulation. We previously demonstrated that antigen-specific immunosuppressive exosomes could be isolated from the blood plasma of antigen-immunized mice. Here, we demonstrate that plasma-derived exosomes isolated from mice bearing OVA-expressing tumors were able to suppress OVA-specific immune responses in a mouse delayed-type hypersensitivity model. Enrichment of tumor-derived exosomes in the plasma of mice bearing subcutaneous melanoma was not detected using an exosome-tagging approach. Instead, depletion of MHC class II(+) vesicles from plasma-derived exosomes or using plasma-derived exosomes isolated from MHC class II-deficient mice resulted in significant abrogation of the suppressive effect. These results demonstrate that circulating host-derived, MHC class II(+) exosomes in tumor-bearing hosts are able to suppress the immune response specific to tumor antigens. (hide) EV-METRIC 11% (25th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Blood plasma Sample origin NAY Focus vesicles exosomes Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (d)(U)C IAF Protein markers EV: MHC2/ CD9/ MFGE8 non-EV: Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Blood plasma Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 60 Immunoaffinity capture Selected surface protein(s) MHC2 Characterization: Protein analysis Western Blot Antibody details provided? No Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ MFGE8/ MHC2 ELISA Antibody details provided? No Detected EV-associated proteins CD9/ MFGE8/ MHC2 Characterization: Particle analysis EM EM-type transmission EM Image type Close-up

	EV120098	2/2	Mus musculus	NAY	(d)(U)C Filtration UF	Yang C	2012	11%
Study summary Full title Plasma-derived MHC class II+ exosomes from tumor-bearing mice suppress tumor antigen-specific immune responses All authors Yang C, Ruffner MA, Kim SH, Robbins PD Journal Eur J Immunol Abstract Tumor-specific immunosuppression is frequently observed in tumor-bearing hosts. Exosomes are nano-si (show more...)Tumor-specific immunosuppression is frequently observed in tumor-bearing hosts. Exosomes are nano-sized, endosomal-derived membrane vesicles secreted by most tumor and hematopoietic cells and have been shown to actively participate in immune regulation. We previously demonstrated that antigen-specific immunosuppressive exosomes could be isolated from the blood plasma of antigen-immunized mice. Here, we demonstrate that plasma-derived exosomes isolated from mice bearing OVA-expressing tumors were able to suppress OVA-specific immune responses in a mouse delayed-type hypersensitivity model. Enrichment of tumor-derived exosomes in the plasma of mice bearing subcutaneous melanoma was not detected using an exosome-tagging approach. Instead, depletion of MHC class II(+) vesicles from plasma-derived exosomes or using plasma-derived exosomes isolated from MHC class II-deficient mice resulted in significant abrogation of the suppressive effect. These results demonstrate that circulating host-derived, MHC class II(+) exosomes in tumor-bearing hosts are able to suppress the immune response specific to tumor antigens. (hide) EV-METRIC 11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin NAY Focus vesicles exosomes Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (d)(U)C Filtration UF Protein markers EV: Alix/ MHC2/ MFGE8 non-EV: Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-harvesting Medium EV Depleted Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 90 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Characterization: Protein analysis Western Blot Antibody details provided? No Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ MFGE8/ MHC2 ELISA Antibody details provided? No Detected EV-associated proteins Alix/ MFGE8/ MHC2 Characterization: Particle analysis None

				1 - 2 of 2

EV-TRACK ID	EV120098
species	Mus musculus
sample type	Blood plasma	Cell culture
cell type	NA	NAY
medium		EV Depleted
condition	NAY	NAY
separation protocol	(d)(U)C IAF	(d)(U)C Filtration UF
Exp. nr.	1	2
EV-METRIC %	11	11