Search > Results

You searched for: EV120073 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV120073 1/1 Homo sapiens Urine (d)(U)C Li ZZ 2012 11%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Li ZZ, Zhao ZZ, Wen JG, Xing L, Zhang H, Zhang Y
Journal
J Pediatr Surg
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Down-regulation of aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and up-regulation of transforming growth f (show more...)BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Down-regulation of aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and up-regulation of transforming growth factor ?(1) (TGF-?(1)) in the renal parenchyma have been demonstrated in children who underwent pyeloplasty for pelviureteral junction obstruction. However, no information about urinary exosomal AQP1 and TGF-?(1) during postobstructive polyuria in children with congenital unilateral hydronephrosis is available. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the urine concentration of exosomal AQP1 and TGF-?(1) on the first and the second day after surgery in children who underwent pyeloplasty. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (age, 36.2 ± 17.1 months) with unilateral pelviureteral junction obstruction were examined in the study. For the first 2 days after the operation, the urine was collected separately from pyelostomy draining only from the postobstructed kidney and from the bladder catheter draining mostly from the contralateral kidney, which was used as an internal control. Urinary output, urinary osmolality, sodium, ?(2)-microglobulin (?(2)-MG), and creatinine, as well as urinary exosomal AQP1 and TGF-?(1) excretion, were tested in each sample. RESULTS: After pyeloplasty, a significantly decreased urinary excretion of exosomal AQP1 (? 64%) was found in the postobstructed kidney. The patients developed polyuria (807 ± 216 mL/24 h vs 484 ± 144 mL/24 h at day 1, 1021 ± 348 mL/24 h vs 603 ± 228 mL/24 h at day 2; P < .01) and reduced urine osmolality (115 ± 44 mOsm/kg vs 282 ± 61 mOsm/kg at day 1, 139 ± 39 vs 303 ± 46 mOsm/kg at day 2; P < .01) that persisted for 48 hours. In parallel, urinary TGF-?(1) and ?(2)-MG (normalized for creatinine) from the postobstructed kidney were significantly higher compared with the contralateral kidney. The urine output and urinary sodium concentration from the postobstructed kidney elevated significantly on the second day after the release of obstruction compared with those on the first day. The contralateral kidney also showed same trends. CONCLUSIONS: The down-regulation of urinary exosomal AQP1 in the postobstructed kidney may account for the polyuria, hypotonic urine, and elevated urinary ?(2)-MG. The urinary TGF-?(1) level locally increased in the postobstructed kidney may be involved in renal AQP1 down-regulation. (hide)
EV-METRIC
11% (33rd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: AQP1
non-EV:
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Equal to or above 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
Yes
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
AQP1
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
AQP1
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV120073
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Urine
condition
NAY
separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
11