EV-TRACK

Search > Results

You searched for: EV100087 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Results list Study Tree

Details	EV-TRACK ID	Experiment nr.	Species	Sample type	Separation protocol	First author	Year	EV-METRIC
	EV100087	1/1	Mus musculus	NAY	(d)(U)C Filtration	Schnitzer JK	2010	0%
Study summary Full title Fragments of antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DC) and DC-derived exosomes induce protective immunity against Leishmania major All authors Schnitzer JK, Berzel S, Fajardo-Moser M, Remer KA, Moll H Journal Vaccine Abstract Upon loading with parasite antigen and adoptive transfer, dendritic cells (DC) are able to confer pr (show more...)Upon loading with parasite antigen and adoptive transfer, dendritic cells (DC) are able to confer protection against the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. In the present study, we investigated whether viable DC are required for inducing protection. We provide evidence that L. major antigen-loaded DC that had been fixed with paraformaldehyde or exposed to UV irradiation, and even disrupted cells, are able to serve as an effective vaccine. Furthermore, we demonstrate the potential of DC-derived exosomes to mediate protective immunity against cutaneous leishmaniasis. The route of antigen presentation to recipient T cells involves uptake of intravenously injected DC fragments into late endosomal compartments of splenic DC in the recipient. In vitro studies showed that DC fragments induce T-cell proliferation and interleukin 12 secretion by splenocytes. Together, these findings suggest that the development of a cell-free vaccine for immunoprophylaxis against leishmaniasis and other infectious diseases is feasible. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin NAY Focus vesicles exosomes Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (d)(U)C Filtration Protein markers EV: non-EV: Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 300 Filtration steps 0.22µm or 0.2µm Characterization: Particle analysis EM EM-type transmission EM

				1 - 1 of 1

EV-TRACK ID	EV100087
species	Mus musculus
sample type	Cell culture
cell type	NAY
condition	NAY
separation protocol	(d)(U)C Filtration
Exp. nr.	1
EV-METRIC %	0