EV-TRACK

Search > Results

You searched for: EV100044 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Results list Study Tree

Details	EV-TRACK ID	Experiment nr.	Species	Sample type	Separation protocol	First author	Year	EV-METRIC
	EV100044	1/1	Mus musculus	NAY	(d)(U)C DG	Liu Y	2010	29%
Study summary Full title Contribution of MyD88 to the tumor exosome-mediated induction of myeloid derived suppressor cells All authors Liu Y, Xiang X, Zhuang X, Zhang S, Liu C, Cheng Z, Michalek S, Grizzle W, Zhang HG Journal Am J Pathol Abstract In this study we observed that mice pretreated with tumor exosomes had a significant acceleration of (show more...)In this study we observed that mice pretreated with tumor exosomes had a significant acceleration of tumor metastasis in the lung. Tumor metastasis correlated significantly with an increase in recruitment of more Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the lung of C57BL/6j (B6) mice pretreated with tumor exosomes. These effects were blunted when MyD88 knockout (KO) mice were pretreated with tumor exosomes. MDSCs induced by tumor exosomes and isolated from wild-type B6 mice also more potently inhibited T cell activation and induction of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha than MDSCs isolated from the lung of MyD88 KO mice. In vitro, addition of tumor exosomes to bone marrow-derived CD11b(+)Gr-1(+) cells isolated from wild-type B6 mice resulted in more cytokine production, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and the chemokine CCL2, than CD11b(+)Gr-1(+) cells isolated from MyD88 KO mice. Moreover, lower levels of CCL2 were observed in the lungs in MyD88 KO mice pretreated with tumor exosomes than that in wild-type mice. Together these data demonstrate a pivotal role for MyD88 in tumor exosome-mediated expansion of MDSCs and tumor metastasis. (hide) EV-METRIC 29% (68th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin NAY Focus vesicles exosomes Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (d)(U)C DG Adj. k-factor 362.8 (pelleting) Protein markers EV: non-EV: Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-harvesting Medium EV Depleted Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 60 Pelleting: rotor type SW28 Pelleting: adjusted k-factor 362.8 Density gradient Lowest density fraction 0.25 Highest density fraction 2.5 Speed (g) 70000

				1 - 1 of 1

EV-TRACK ID	EV100044
species	Mus musculus
sample type	Cell culture
cell type	NAY
condition	NAY
separation protocol	(d)(U)C DG
Exp. nr.	1
EV-METRIC %	29