Search > Results

You searched for: EV240025 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 5 of 5

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV240025 1/5 Homo sapiens Blood plasma DC
UF
Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation
Hu L 2024 75%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Hu L, Zheng X, Zhou M, Wang J, Tong L, Dong M, Xu T, Li Z
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, t (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, the identification of EVs derived from blood samples is hindered by the presence of abundant plasma proteins, which impairs the downstream biochemical analysis of EV-associated proteins and nucleic acids. Here, we employed optimized asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) combined with density cushion ultracentrifugation (UC) to obtain high-purity and intact EVs with very low lipoprotein contamination from human plasma and serum. Further proteomic analysis revealed more than 1000 EV-associated proteins, a large proportion of which has not been previously reported. Specifically, we found that cell-line-derived EV markers are incompatible with the identification of plasma-EVs and proposed that the proteins MYCT1, TSPAN14, MPIG6B and MYADM, as well as the traditional EV markers CD63 and CD147, are plasma-EV markers. Benefiting from the high-purity of EVs, we conducted comprehensive miRNA profiling of plasma EVs and nanosized particles (NPs), as well as compared plasma- and serum-derived EVs, which provides a valuable resource for the EV research community. Overall, our findings provide a comprehensive assessment of human blood EVs as a basis for clinical biopsy applications. (hide)
EV-METRIC
75% (96th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density cushion
Ultrafiltration
Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation
Protein markers
EV: Alix/ CD9/ Syntenin-1/ CD147/ TSPAN14/ MYCT1
non-EV: Albumin/ ApoA1/ ApoB
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker/New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
50
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Density cushion
Density medium
glycerol
Sample volume
1.25
Cushion volume
0.25
Density of the cushion
20%
Centrifugation time
90
Centrifugation speed
150000
Other
Name other separation method
Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation
Other
Name other separation method
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
Alix/ CD9/ Syntenin-1/ CD147/ TSPAN14/ MYCT1
Detected contaminants
ApoB
Not detected contaminants
Albumin/ ApoA1
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange
Characterization: RNA analysis
RNA analysis
Type
RNA-sequencing
Database
Genome Sequence Archive
Proteinase treatment
No
RNAse treatment
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
132
EV concentration
Yes
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
EV240025 3/5 Homo sapiens Blood plasma (d)(U)C Hu L 2024 63%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Hu L, Zheng X, Zhou M, Wang J, Tong L, Dong M, Xu T, Li Z
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, t (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, the identification of EVs derived from blood samples is hindered by the presence of abundant plasma proteins, which impairs the downstream biochemical analysis of EV-associated proteins and nucleic acids. Here, we employed optimized asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) combined with density cushion ultracentrifugation (UC) to obtain high-purity and intact EVs with very low lipoprotein contamination from human plasma and serum. Further proteomic analysis revealed more than 1000 EV-associated proteins, a large proportion of which has not been previously reported. Specifically, we found that cell-line-derived EV markers are incompatible with the identification of plasma-EVs and proposed that the proteins MYCT1, TSPAN14, MPIG6B and MYADM, as well as the traditional EV markers CD63 and CD147, are plasma-EV markers. Benefiting from the high-purity of EVs, we conducted comprehensive miRNA profiling of plasma EVs and nanosized particles (NPs), as well as compared plasma- and serum-derived EVs, which provides a valuable resource for the EV research community. Overall, our findings provide a comprehensive assessment of human blood EVs as a basis for clinical biopsy applications. (hide)
EV-METRIC
63% (90th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Protein markers
EV: Alix/ CD9/ Syntenin-1
non-EV: Albumin/ ApoA1/ ApoB
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker/New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Equal to or above 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
TLS-55
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Other
Name other separation method
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
Alix/ CD9/ Syntenin-1
Detected contaminants
Albumin/ ApoA1/ ApoB
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV240025 4/5 Homo sapiens Blood plasma DC Hu L 2024 63%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Hu L, Zheng X, Zhou M, Wang J, Tong L, Dong M, Xu T, Li Z
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, t (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, the identification of EVs derived from blood samples is hindered by the presence of abundant plasma proteins, which impairs the downstream biochemical analysis of EV-associated proteins and nucleic acids. Here, we employed optimized asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) combined with density cushion ultracentrifugation (UC) to obtain high-purity and intact EVs with very low lipoprotein contamination from human plasma and serum. Further proteomic analysis revealed more than 1000 EV-associated proteins, a large proportion of which has not been previously reported. Specifically, we found that cell-line-derived EV markers are incompatible with the identification of plasma-EVs and proposed that the proteins MYCT1, TSPAN14, MPIG6B and MYADM, as well as the traditional EV markers CD63 and CD147, are plasma-EV markers. Benefiting from the high-purity of EVs, we conducted comprehensive miRNA profiling of plasma EVs and nanosized particles (NPs), as well as compared plasma- and serum-derived EVs, which provides a valuable resource for the EV research community. Overall, our findings provide a comprehensive assessment of human blood EVs as a basis for clinical biopsy applications. (hide)
EV-METRIC
63% (90th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density cushion
Protein markers
EV: Alix/ CD9/ Syntenin-1
non-EV: Albumin/ ApoA1/ ApoB
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker/New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
Density cushion
Density medium
glycerol
Sample volume
1.25
Cushion volume
0.25
Density of the cushion
20%
Centrifugation time
90
Centrifugation speed
150000
Other
Name other separation method
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
Alix/ CD9/ Syntenin-1
Detected contaminants
Albumin/ ApoA1/ ApoB
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
105.1
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
particles per milliliter of starting sample: 1.85E+10
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV240025 5/5 Homo sapiens Blood plasma DC
qEV35
Hu L 2024 63%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Hu L, Zheng X, Zhou M, Wang J, Tong L, Dong M, Xu T, Li Z
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, t (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, the identification of EVs derived from blood samples is hindered by the presence of abundant plasma proteins, which impairs the downstream biochemical analysis of EV-associated proteins and nucleic acids. Here, we employed optimized asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) combined with density cushion ultracentrifugation (UC) to obtain high-purity and intact EVs with very low lipoprotein contamination from human plasma and serum. Further proteomic analysis revealed more than 1000 EV-associated proteins, a large proportion of which has not been previously reported. Specifically, we found that cell-line-derived EV markers are incompatible with the identification of plasma-EVs and proposed that the proteins MYCT1, TSPAN14, MPIG6B and MYADM, as well as the traditional EV markers CD63 and CD147, are plasma-EV markers. Benefiting from the high-purity of EVs, we conducted comprehensive miRNA profiling of plasma EVs and nanosized particles (NPs), as well as compared plasma- and serum-derived EVs, which provides a valuable resource for the EV research community. Overall, our findings provide a comprehensive assessment of human blood EVs as a basis for clinical biopsy applications. (hide)
EV-METRIC
63% (90th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density cushion
Commercial method
Protein markers
EV: Alix/ CD9/ Syntenin-1
non-EV: Albumin/ ApoA1/ ApoB
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker/New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
Commercial kit
qEV35
Density cushion
Density medium
glycerol
Sample volume
1.25
Cushion volume
0.25
Density of the cushion
20%
Centrifugation time
90
Centrifugation speed
150000
Other
Name other separation method
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
Alix/ CD9/ Syntenin-1
Detected contaminants
Albumin/ ApoA1/ ApoB
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
103.8
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
particles per milliliter of starting sample: 1.80E+09
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV240025 2/5 Homo sapiens Serum DC
UF
Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation
Hu L 2024 33%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Hu L, Zheng X, Zhou M, Wang J, Tong L, Dong M, Xu T, Li Z
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, t (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising tool for clinical liquid biopsy. However, the identification of EVs derived from blood samples is hindered by the presence of abundant plasma proteins, which impairs the downstream biochemical analysis of EV-associated proteins and nucleic acids. Here, we employed optimized asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) combined with density cushion ultracentrifugation (UC) to obtain high-purity and intact EVs with very low lipoprotein contamination from human plasma and serum. Further proteomic analysis revealed more than 1000 EV-associated proteins, a large proportion of which has not been previously reported. Specifically, we found that cell-line-derived EV markers are incompatible with the identification of plasma-EVs and proposed that the proteins MYCT1, TSPAN14, MPIG6B and MYADM, as well as the traditional EV markers CD63 and CD147, are plasma-EV markers. Benefiting from the high-purity of EVs, we conducted comprehensive miRNA profiling of plasma EVs and nanosized particles (NPs), as well as compared plasma- and serum-derived EVs, which provides a valuable resource for the EV research community. Overall, our findings provide a comprehensive assessment of human blood EVs as a basis for clinical biopsy applications. (hide)
EV-METRIC
33% (76th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Serum
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density cushion
Ultrafiltration
Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker/New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Serum
Separation Method
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
50
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Density cushion
Density medium
glycerol
Sample volume
1.25
Cushion volume
0.25
Density of the cushion
20%
Centrifugation time
90
Centrifugation speed
150000
Other
Name other separation method
Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation
Other
Name other separation method
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
1 - 5 of 5
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV240025
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Blood plasma
Blood plasma
Blood plasma
Blood plasma
Serum
condition
Control condition
Control condition
Control condition
Control condition
Control condition
separation protocol
DC/ Ultrafiltration/
Asymmetric-flow field-flow
fractionation
dUC
DC
DC/ qEV35
DC/ Ultrafiltration/
Asymmetric-flow field-flow
fractionation
Exp. nr.
1
3
4
5
2
EV-METRIC %
75
63
63
63
33