Search > Results
You searched for: EV230873 (EV-TRACK ID)
Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Details | EV-TRACK ID | Experiment nr. | Species | Sample type | Separation protocol | First author | Year | EV-METRIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV230873 | 3/8 | Enterococcus faecium | E155 |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration UF |
Wagner T | 2018 | 57% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
57% (92nd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Exponential growth in BHI
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Ultrafiltration Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
E155
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per MV/CFU
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
37
EM
EM-type
Atomic force microscopy
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV230873 | 1/8 | Enterococcus faecium | DO |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration UF |
Wagner T | 2018 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Exponential growth in BHI
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Ultrafiltration Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
DO
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per MV/CFU
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
42
|
||||||||
EV230873 | 2/8 | Enterococcus faecium | DO |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration UF |
Wagner T | 2018 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Stationary growth in LB
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Ultrafiltration Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
DO
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV230873 | 4/8 | Enterococcus faecium | E155 |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration UF |
Wagner T | 2018 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Stationary growth in LB
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Ultrafiltration Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
E155
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV230873 | 5/8 | Enterococcus faecium | K59-68 |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration UF |
Wagner T | 2018 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Exponential growth in BHI
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Ultrafiltration Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
K59-68
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per MV/CFU
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
83
|
||||||||
EV230873 | 6/8 | Enterococcus faecium | K59-68 |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration UF |
Wagner T | 2018 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Stationary growth in LB
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Ultrafiltration Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
K59-68
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV230873 | 7/8 | Enterococcus faecium | K60-39 |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration UF |
Wagner T | 2018 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Exponential growth in BHI
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Ultrafiltration Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
K60-39
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per MV/CFU
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
51
|
||||||||
EV230873 | 8/8 | Enterococcus faecium | K60-39 |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration UF |
Wagner T | 2018 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Stationary growth in LB
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Ultrafiltration Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
K60-39
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
1 - 8 of 8 |
EV-TRACK ID | EV230873 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
species | Enterococcus faecium | |||||||
sample type | Cell culture | |||||||
cell type | E155 | DO | DO | E155 | K59-68 | K59-68 | K60-39 | K60-39 |
condition | Exponential growth in BHI | Exponential growth in BHI | Stationary growth in LB | Stationary growth in LB | Exponential growth in BHI | Stationary growth in LB | Exponential growth in BHI | Stationary growth in LB |
separation protocol | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration/ Ultrafiltration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration/ Ultrafiltration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration/ Ultrafiltration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration/ Ultrafiltration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration/ Ultrafiltration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration/ Ultrafiltration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration/ Ultrafiltration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration/ Ultrafiltration |
Exp. nr. | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
EV-METRIC % | 57 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 43 |