Search > Results

You searched for: EV230873 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 8 of 8

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV230873 3/8 Enterococcus faecium E155 (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Wagner T 2018 57%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resistant to several antimicrobials and has a great ability to acquire new traits. Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are increasingly recognized as a mode of cell-free communication and a way to deliver virulence factors and/or antimicrobial resistance determinants. These features make MVs interesting research targets in research on critical hospital pathogens. This study describes for the first time that E. faecium strains produce MVs. It presents a morphological as well as a proteomic analysis of MVs isolated from four different, clinically relevant E. faecium strains grown under two different conditions and identifies MV-associated proteins in all of them. Interestingly, 11 virulence factors are found among the MV-associated proteins, including biofilm-promoting proteins and extracellular matrix-binding proteins, which may aid in enterococcal colonization. Additionally, 11 antimicrobial resistance-related proteins were MV-associated. Among those, all proteins encoded by the vanA-cluster of a vancomycin resistant strain were found to be MV-associated. This implies that E. faecium MVs may be utilized by the bacterium to release proteins promoting virulence, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. (hide)
EV-METRIC
57% (92nd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Exponential growth in BHI
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
E155
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per MV/CFU
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
37
EM
EM-type
Atomic force microscopy
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
EV230873 1/8 Enterococcus faecium DO (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Wagner T 2018 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resistant to several antimicrobials and has a great ability to acquire new traits. Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are increasingly recognized as a mode of cell-free communication and a way to deliver virulence factors and/or antimicrobial resistance determinants. These features make MVs interesting research targets in research on critical hospital pathogens. This study describes for the first time that E. faecium strains produce MVs. It presents a morphological as well as a proteomic analysis of MVs isolated from four different, clinically relevant E. faecium strains grown under two different conditions and identifies MV-associated proteins in all of them. Interestingly, 11 virulence factors are found among the MV-associated proteins, including biofilm-promoting proteins and extracellular matrix-binding proteins, which may aid in enterococcal colonization. Additionally, 11 antimicrobial resistance-related proteins were MV-associated. Among those, all proteins encoded by the vanA-cluster of a vancomycin resistant strain were found to be MV-associated. This implies that E. faecium MVs may be utilized by the bacterium to release proteins promoting virulence, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Exponential growth in BHI
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
DO
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per MV/CFU
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
42
EV230873 2/8 Enterococcus faecium DO (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Wagner T 2018 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resistant to several antimicrobials and has a great ability to acquire new traits. Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are increasingly recognized as a mode of cell-free communication and a way to deliver virulence factors and/or antimicrobial resistance determinants. These features make MVs interesting research targets in research on critical hospital pathogens. This study describes for the first time that E. faecium strains produce MVs. It presents a morphological as well as a proteomic analysis of MVs isolated from four different, clinically relevant E. faecium strains grown under two different conditions and identifies MV-associated proteins in all of them. Interestingly, 11 virulence factors are found among the MV-associated proteins, including biofilm-promoting proteins and extracellular matrix-binding proteins, which may aid in enterococcal colonization. Additionally, 11 antimicrobial resistance-related proteins were MV-associated. Among those, all proteins encoded by the vanA-cluster of a vancomycin resistant strain were found to be MV-associated. This implies that E. faecium MVs may be utilized by the bacterium to release proteins promoting virulence, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Stationary growth in LB
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
DO
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV230873 4/8 Enterococcus faecium E155 (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Wagner T 2018 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resistant to several antimicrobials and has a great ability to acquire new traits. Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are increasingly recognized as a mode of cell-free communication and a way to deliver virulence factors and/or antimicrobial resistance determinants. These features make MVs interesting research targets in research on critical hospital pathogens. This study describes for the first time that E. faecium strains produce MVs. It presents a morphological as well as a proteomic analysis of MVs isolated from four different, clinically relevant E. faecium strains grown under two different conditions and identifies MV-associated proteins in all of them. Interestingly, 11 virulence factors are found among the MV-associated proteins, including biofilm-promoting proteins and extracellular matrix-binding proteins, which may aid in enterococcal colonization. Additionally, 11 antimicrobial resistance-related proteins were MV-associated. Among those, all proteins encoded by the vanA-cluster of a vancomycin resistant strain were found to be MV-associated. This implies that E. faecium MVs may be utilized by the bacterium to release proteins promoting virulence, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Stationary growth in LB
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
E155
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV230873 5/8 Enterococcus faecium K59-68 (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Wagner T 2018 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resistant to several antimicrobials and has a great ability to acquire new traits. Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are increasingly recognized as a mode of cell-free communication and a way to deliver virulence factors and/or antimicrobial resistance determinants. These features make MVs interesting research targets in research on critical hospital pathogens. This study describes for the first time that E. faecium strains produce MVs. It presents a morphological as well as a proteomic analysis of MVs isolated from four different, clinically relevant E. faecium strains grown under two different conditions and identifies MV-associated proteins in all of them. Interestingly, 11 virulence factors are found among the MV-associated proteins, including biofilm-promoting proteins and extracellular matrix-binding proteins, which may aid in enterococcal colonization. Additionally, 11 antimicrobial resistance-related proteins were MV-associated. Among those, all proteins encoded by the vanA-cluster of a vancomycin resistant strain were found to be MV-associated. This implies that E. faecium MVs may be utilized by the bacterium to release proteins promoting virulence, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Exponential growth in BHI
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
K59-68
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per MV/CFU
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
83
EV230873 6/8 Enterococcus faecium K59-68 (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Wagner T 2018 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resistant to several antimicrobials and has a great ability to acquire new traits. Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are increasingly recognized as a mode of cell-free communication and a way to deliver virulence factors and/or antimicrobial resistance determinants. These features make MVs interesting research targets in research on critical hospital pathogens. This study describes for the first time that E. faecium strains produce MVs. It presents a morphological as well as a proteomic analysis of MVs isolated from four different, clinically relevant E. faecium strains grown under two different conditions and identifies MV-associated proteins in all of them. Interestingly, 11 virulence factors are found among the MV-associated proteins, including biofilm-promoting proteins and extracellular matrix-binding proteins, which may aid in enterococcal colonization. Additionally, 11 antimicrobial resistance-related proteins were MV-associated. Among those, all proteins encoded by the vanA-cluster of a vancomycin resistant strain were found to be MV-associated. This implies that E. faecium MVs may be utilized by the bacterium to release proteins promoting virulence, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Stationary growth in LB
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
K59-68
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV230873 7/8 Enterococcus faecium K60-39 (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Wagner T 2018 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resistant to several antimicrobials and has a great ability to acquire new traits. Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are increasingly recognized as a mode of cell-free communication and a way to deliver virulence factors and/or antimicrobial resistance determinants. These features make MVs interesting research targets in research on critical hospital pathogens. This study describes for the first time that E. faecium strains produce MVs. It presents a morphological as well as a proteomic analysis of MVs isolated from four different, clinically relevant E. faecium strains grown under two different conditions and identifies MV-associated proteins in all of them. Interestingly, 11 virulence factors are found among the MV-associated proteins, including biofilm-promoting proteins and extracellular matrix-binding proteins, which may aid in enterococcal colonization. Additionally, 11 antimicrobial resistance-related proteins were MV-associated. Among those, all proteins encoded by the vanA-cluster of a vancomycin resistant strain were found to be MV-associated. This implies that E. faecium MVs may be utilized by the bacterium to release proteins promoting virulence, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Exponential growth in BHI
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
K60-39
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per MV/CFU
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
51
EV230873 8/8 Enterococcus faecium K60-39 (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Wagner T 2018 43%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wagner T, Joshi B, Janice J, Askarian F, Škalko-Basnet N, Hagestad OC, Mekhlif A, Wai SN, Hegstad K, Johannessen M
Journal
J Proteomics
Abstract
Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resi (show more...)Enterococcus faecium is a commensal but also a bacteremia causing pathogen, which is inherently resistant to several antimicrobials and has a great ability to acquire new traits. Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are increasingly recognized as a mode of cell-free communication and a way to deliver virulence factors and/or antimicrobial resistance determinants. These features make MVs interesting research targets in research on critical hospital pathogens. This study describes for the first time that E. faecium strains produce MVs. It presents a morphological as well as a proteomic analysis of MVs isolated from four different, clinically relevant E. faecium strains grown under two different conditions and identifies MV-associated proteins in all of them. Interestingly, 11 virulence factors are found among the MV-associated proteins, including biofilm-promoting proteins and extracellular matrix-binding proteins, which may aid in enterococcal colonization. Additionally, 11 antimicrobial resistance-related proteins were MV-associated. Among those, all proteins encoded by the vanA-cluster of a vancomycin resistant strain were found to be MV-associated. This implies that E. faecium MVs may be utilized by the bacterium to release proteins promoting virulence, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. (hide)
EV-METRIC
43% (81st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Stationary growth in LB
Focus vesicles
Membrane vesicles (MVs)
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Adj. k-factor
17410 (washing)
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Enterococcus faecium
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
K60-39
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 40 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Wash: time (min)
180
Wash: Rotor Type
SW 40 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
20000
Wash: adjusted k-factor
17410
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
30%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
180
Fraction volume (mL)
0.2
Fraction processing
Ultrafiltration
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
TDB
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
1 - 8 of 8
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV230873
species
Enterococcus
faecium
sample type
Cell
culture
cell type
E155
DO
DO
E155
K59-68
K59-68
K60-39
K60-39
condition
Exponential
growth
in
BHI
Exponential
growth
in
BHI
Stationary
growth
in
LB
Stationary
growth
in
LB
Exponential
growth
in
BHI
Stationary
growth
in
LB
Exponential
growth
in
BHI
Stationary
growth
in
LB
separation protocol
dUC/
Density
gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
dUC/
Density
gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
dUC/
Density
gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
dUC/
Density
gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
dUC/
Density
gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
dUC/
Density
gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
dUC/
Density
gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
dUC/
Density
gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
Exp. nr.
3
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
EV-METRIC %
57
43
43
43
43
43
43
43