Search > Results

You searched for: EV230783 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV230783 1/1 Salmonella enterica chi 3744 (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
Liu Q 2017 67%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Liu Q, Yi J, Liang K, Zhang X, Liu Q
Journal
J Microbiol Biotechnol
Abstract
Foodborne contamination and salmonellosis caused by Enteritidis (. Enteritidis) are a significant t (show more...)Foodborne contamination and salmonellosis caused by Enteritidis (. Enteritidis) are a significant threat to human health and poultry enterprises. Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), which are naturally secreted by gram-negative bacteria, could be a good vaccine option because they have many biologically active substances, including lipopolysaccharides (LPS), outer membrane proteins (OMPs), and phospholipids, as well as periplasmic components. In the present study, we purified OMVs derived from . Enteritidis and analyzed their characteristics through silver staining and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In total, 108 proteins were identified in . Enteritidis OMVs through liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis, and OMPs, periplasmic proteins, and extracellular proteins (49.9% of total proteins) were found to be enriched in the OMVs compared with bacterial cells. Furthermore, native OMVs used in immunizations by either the intranasal route or the intraperitoneal route could elicit significant humoral and mucosal immune responses and provide strong protective efficiency against a lethal dose (~100-fold LD) of the wild-type . Enteritidis infection. These results indicated that . Enteritidis OMVs might be an ideal vaccine strategy for preventing . Enteritidis diseases. (hide)
EV-METRIC
67% (94th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: SopD/ TufA/ SEN0876
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Salmonella enterica
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
chi 3744
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: speed (g)
40000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
45%
Speed (g)
150000
Duration (min)
overnight
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: speed (g)
40000
Filtration steps
Between 0.22 and 0.45 µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Proteomics database
No
Detected contaminants
SopD/ TufA/ SEN0876
Characterization: Lipid analysis
Yes
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV230783
species
Salmonella enterica
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
chi 3744
condition
Control condition
separation protocol
dUC/
Density gradient/ Filtration
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
67