Search > Results

You searched for: EV230776 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV230776 1/1 Fibrobacter succinogenes F. succinogenes S85 (ATCC 19169) (d)(U)C
DG
Filtration
UF
Arntzen MØ 2017 50%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Arntzen MØ, Várnai A, Mackie RI, Eijsink VGH, Pope PB
Journal
Environ Microbiol
Abstract
Fibrobacter succinogenes is an anaerobic bacterium naturally colonising the rumen and cecum of herbi (show more...)Fibrobacter succinogenes is an anaerobic bacterium naturally colonising the rumen and cecum of herbivores where it utilizes an enigmatic mechanism to deconstruct cellulose into cellobiose and glucose, which serve as carbon sources for growth. Here, we illustrate that outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) released by F. succinogenes are enriched with carbohydrate-active enzymes and that intact OMVs were able to depolymerize a broad range of linear and branched hemicelluloses and pectin, despite the inability of F. succinogenes to utilize non-cellulosic (pentose) sugars for growth. We hypothesize that the degradative versatility of F. succinogenes OMVs is used to prime hydrolysis by destabilising the tight networks of polysaccharides intertwining cellulose in the plant cell wall, thus increasing accessibility of the target substrate for the host cell. This is supported by observations that OMV-pretreatment of the natural complex substrate switchgrass increased the catalytic efficiency of a commercial cellulose-degrading enzyme cocktail by 2.4-fold. We also show that the OMVs contain a putative multiprotein complex, including the fibro-slime protein previously found to be important in binding to crystalline cellulose. We hypothesize that this complex has a function in plant cell wall degradation, either by catalysing polysaccharide degradation itself, or by targeting the vesicles to plant biomass. (hide)
EV-METRIC
50% (87th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Filtration
Ultrafiltration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
EV density (g/ml)
not specified
Show all info
Study aim
Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Fibrobacter succinogenes
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
F. succinogenes S85 (ATCC 19169)
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
not specified if it was continuous or not
Lowest density fraction
not specified
Highest density fraction
not specified
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
not specified
Sample volume (mL)
not spec
Speed (g)
200000
Duration (min)
120
Fraction volume (mL)
not specified
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
12 ml
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Filtration steps
Between 0.22 and 0.45 μm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10 en 10
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Proteomics database
ProteomeXchange consortium
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
49
EM
EM-type
Transmission­-EM
Image type
Close-up
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV230776
species
Fibrobacter
succinogenes
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
F.
succinogenes S85 (ATCC 19169)
condition
Control condition
separation protocol
dUC/
Density gradient/
Filtration/
Ultrafiltration
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
50