Search > Results
You searched for: EV230629 (EV-TRACK ID)
Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Details | EV-TRACK ID | Experiment nr. | Species | Sample type | Separation protocol | First author | Year | EV-METRIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV230629 | 2/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | Rd KW20 |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 56% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
56% (90th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Pure outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: RpoA Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Rd KW20
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Western Blot
Not detected contaminants
RpoA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
Yes
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV230629 | 4/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | Hib strain Eagan |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 56% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
56% (90th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Pure outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: RpoA Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Hib strain Eagan
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Western Blot
Not detected contaminants
RpoA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
Yes
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV230629 | 6/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | NTHi 2019-R |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 56% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
56% (90th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Pure outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: RpoA Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
NTHi 2019-R
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Western Blot
Not detected contaminants
RpoA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
Yes
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV230629 | 1/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | Rd KW20 |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 33% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
33% (74th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: RpoA Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Rd KW20
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
8
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
50%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
9.8 + sample
Sample volume (mL)
not spec
Orientation
top-down
Speed (g)
150000
Duration (min)
1020
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
not spec
Pelleting: duration (min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Western Blot
Not detected contaminants
RpoA
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
89
|
||||||||
EV230629 | 3/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | Hib strain Eagan |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 33% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
33% (74th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: RpoA Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Hib strain Eagan
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
8
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
50%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
9.8 + sample
Sample volume (mL)
not spec
Orientation
top-down
Speed (g)
150000
Duration (min)
1020
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
not spec
Pelleting: duration (min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Western Blot
Not detected contaminants
RpoA
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
152
|
||||||||
EV230629 | 5/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | NTHi 2019-R |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 33% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
33% (74th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: RpoA Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
NTHi 2019-R
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
8
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
50%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
9.8 + sample
Sample volume (mL)
not spec
Orientation
top-down
Speed (g)
150000
Duration (min)
1020
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
not spec
Pelleting: duration (min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Western Blot
Not detected contaminants
RpoA
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
82
|
||||||||
EV230629 | 7/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | NTHi 1479-R |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 14% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
14% (44th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
NTHi 1479-R
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
99
|
||||||||
EV230629 | 8/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | NTHi 3198-R |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 14% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
14% (44th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
NTHi 3198-R
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
101
|
||||||||
EV230629 | 9/9 | Haemophilus influenzae | NTHi 9274-R |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Roier S | 2015 | 14% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Roier S, Blume T, Klug L, Wagner GE, Elhenawy W, Zangger K, Prassl R, Reidl J, Daum G, Feldman MF, Schild S
Journal
Int J Med Microbiol
Abstract
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are spherical and bilayered particles that are naturally released fro (show more...)
EV-METRIC
14% (44th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Outer membrane vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting/Identification of content (omics approaches)/ vaccine development
Sample
Species
Haemophilus influenzae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
NTHi 9274-R
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
240
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
144000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Protein Yield (µg)
per mL/OD490
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
93
|
||||||||
1 - 9 of 9 |
EV-TRACK ID | EV230629 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
species | Haemophilus influenzae | ||||||||
sample type | Cell culture | ||||||||
cell type | Rd KW20 | Hib strain Eagan | NTHi 2019-R | Rd KW20 | Hib strain Eagan | NTHi 2019-R | NTHi 1479-R | NTHi 3198-R | NTHi 9274-R |
condition | Control condition | Control condition | Control condition | Control condition | Control condition | Control condition | Control condition | Control condition | Control condition |
separation protocol | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration | dUC/ Density gradient/ Filtration | dUC/ Filtration | dUC/ Filtration | dUC/ Filtration | dUC/ Filtration | dUC/ Filtration | dUC/ Filtration |
vesicle related term | Pure outer membrane vesicle | Pure outer membrane vesicle | Pure outer membrane vesicle | Outer membrane vesicle | Outer membrane vesicle | Outer membrane vesicle | Outer membrane vesicle | Outer membrane vesicle | Outer membrane vesicle |
Exp. nr. | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
EV-METRIC % | 56 | 56 | 56 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 14 | 14 | 14 |