Search > Results

You searched for: EV230298 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 3 of 3

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV230298 1/3 Escherichia coli APEC O1 DG
(d)(U)C
UF
Filtration
Hu R 2020 57%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Hu R, Li J, Zhao Y, Lin H, Liang L, Wang M, Liu H, Min Y, Gao Y, Yang M
Journal
Microb Cell Fact
Abstract
The well-known fact that avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is harder to prevent due to its nu (show more...)The well-known fact that avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is harder to prevent due to its numerous serogroups has promoted the development of biological immunostimulatory materials as new vaccine candidates in poultry farms. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), known as spherical nanovesicles enriched with various immunostimulants, are naturally secreted by Gram-negative bacteria, and have gained much attention for developing effective vaccine candidates. Recent report has demonstrated that OMVs of APEC O78 can induce protective immunity in chickens. Here, a novel multi-serogroup OMVs (MOMVs) vaccine was developed to achieve cross-protection against APEC infection in broiler chickens. (hide)
EV-METRIC
57% (91st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Other/ Outer membrane vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density gradient
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Ultrafiltration
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Escherichia coli
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
APEC O1
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Equal to or above 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
Type 70 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Lowest density fraction
10%
Highest density fraction
55%
Speed (g)
180000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
not spec
Pelleting: duration (min)
120
Pelleting: rotor type
Type 70 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm,
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
50-200
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM/ Scanning-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV230298 2/3 Escherichia coli APEC O2 DG
(d)(U)C
UF
Filtration
Hu R 2020 57%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Hu R, Li J, Zhao Y, Lin H, Liang L, Wang M, Liu H, Min Y, Gao Y, Yang M
Journal
Microb Cell Fact
Abstract
The well-known fact that avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is harder to prevent due to its nu (show more...)The well-known fact that avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is harder to prevent due to its numerous serogroups has promoted the development of biological immunostimulatory materials as new vaccine candidates in poultry farms. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), known as spherical nanovesicles enriched with various immunostimulants, are naturally secreted by Gram-negative bacteria, and have gained much attention for developing effective vaccine candidates. Recent report has demonstrated that OMVs of APEC O78 can induce protective immunity in chickens. Here, a novel multi-serogroup OMVs (MOMVs) vaccine was developed to achieve cross-protection against APEC infection in broiler chickens. (hide)
EV-METRIC
57% (91st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Other/ Outer membrane vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density gradient
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Ultrafiltration
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Escherichia coli
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
APEC O2
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Equal to or above 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
Type 70 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Lowest density fraction
10%
Highest density fraction
55%
Speed (g)
180000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
not spec
Pelleting: duration (min)
120
Pelleting: rotor type
Type 70 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm,
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV230298 3/3 Escherichia coli APEC 078 DG
(d)(U)C
UF
Filtration
Hu R 2020 57%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Hu R, Li J, Zhao Y, Lin H, Liang L, Wang M, Liu H, Min Y, Gao Y, Yang M
Journal
Microb Cell Fact
Abstract
The well-known fact that avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is harder to prevent due to its nu (show more...)The well-known fact that avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is harder to prevent due to its numerous serogroups has promoted the development of biological immunostimulatory materials as new vaccine candidates in poultry farms. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), known as spherical nanovesicles enriched with various immunostimulants, are naturally secreted by Gram-negative bacteria, and have gained much attention for developing effective vaccine candidates. Recent report has demonstrated that OMVs of APEC O78 can induce protective immunity in chickens. Here, a novel multi-serogroup OMVs (MOMVs) vaccine was developed to achieve cross-protection against APEC infection in broiler chickens. (hide)
EV-METRIC
57% (91st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Other/ Outer membrane vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density gradient
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Ultrafiltration
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Escherichia coli
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
APEC 078
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Equal to or above 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
Type 70 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Lowest density fraction
10%
Highest density fraction
55%
Speed (g)
180000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
not spec
Pelleting: duration (min)
120
Pelleting: rotor type
Type 70 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm,
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
NS
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
1 - 3 of 3
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV230298
species
Escherichia coli
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
APEC O1
APEC O2
APEC 078
condition
Control condition
Control condition
Control condition
separation protocol
Density
gradient/ dUC/
Ultrafiltration/ Filtration
Density
gradient/ dUC/
Ultrafiltration/ Filtration
Density
gradient/ dUC/
Ultrafiltration/ Filtration
Exp. nr.
1
2
3
EV-METRIC %
57
57
57