Search > Results

You searched for: EV230257 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV230257 1/1 Lactobacillus plantarum APsulloc 331 (d)(U)C
Filtration
DG
Kim H 2020 71%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Kim H, Kim M, Myoung K, Kim W, Ko J, Kim KP, Cho EG
Journal
Int J Mol Sci
Abstract
is a popular probiotic species due to its safe and beneficial effects on humans/ therefore, novel (show more...)is a popular probiotic species due to its safe and beneficial effects on humans/ therefore, novel strains have been isolated and identified from various dietary products. Given that bacteria-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been considered as efficient carriers of bioactive materials and shown to evoke cellular responses effectively, -derived EVs are expected to efficiently elicit health benefits. Herein, we identified APsulloc 331261 living in green tea leaves and isolated EVs from the culture medium. We performed quantitative lipidomic analysis of APsulloc 331261 derived EVs (LEVs) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. In comparison to APsulloc 331261, in LEVs, 67 of 320 identified lipid species were significantly increased and 19 species were decreased. In particular, lysophosphatidylserine(18:4) and phosphatidylcholine(32:2) were critically increased, showing over 21-fold enrichment in LEVs. In addition, there was a notable difference between LEVs and the parent cells in the composition of phospholipids. Our results suggest that the lipidomic profile of bacteria-derived EVs is different from that of the parent cells in phospholipid content and composition. Given that lipids are important components of EVs, quantitative and comparative analyses of EV lipids may improve our understanding of vesicle biogenesis and lipid-mediated intercellular communication within or between living organisms. (hide)
EV-METRIC
71% (96th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Density gradient
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Lactobacillus plantarum
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
APsulloc 331
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Cell count
2.7E9
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Equal to or above 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Type
Discontinuous
Lowest density fraction
20%
Highest density fraction
50%
Orientation
Bottom-up
Speed (g)
200000
Duration (min)
120
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
60
Pelleting: duration (min)
180
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
150000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm,
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Bradford
Characterization: Lipid analysis
Yes
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
93
Used for determining EV concentration?
Yes
TRPS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
93
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
other:/ per mg of protein
EM
EM-type
Cryo-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
Report size (nm)
20-200
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV230257
species
Lactobacillus
plantarum
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
APsulloc 331
condition
Control condition
separation protocol
dUC/
Filtration/ Density gradient
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
71