EV-TRACK

Search > Results

You searched for: EV220054 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 14 of 14

Results list Study Tree

Details	EV-TRACK ID	Experiment nr.	Species	Sample type	Separation protocol	First author	Year	EV-METRIC
	EV220054	5/14	Homo sapiens	MCF7	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	25%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 25% (63rd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: CD81/ TNFSF10/ CD63 non-EV: Calnexin/ GM130 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MCF7 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TNFSF10/ CD63/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Calnexin/ GM130 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type RNAsequencing Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	6/14	Homo sapiens	MCF7	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	25%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 25% (63rd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Akti-1/2 Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: CD81/ TNFSF10/ CD63 non-EV: Calnexin/ GM130 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MCF7 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TNFSF10/ CD63/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Calnexin/ GM130 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type RNAsequencing Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	9/14	Homo sapiens	HCT116	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	25%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 25% (63rd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: CD81/ TNFSF10/ CD63 non-EV: Calnexin/ GM130 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells HCT116 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TNFSF10/ CD63/ CD81 Not detected EV-associated proteins CD81/ CD63 Not detected contaminants Calnexin/ GM130 Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type RNAsequencing Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	10/14	Homo sapiens	HCT116	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	25%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 25% (63rd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Akti-1/2 Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: CD81/ TNFSF10/ CD63 non-EV: Calnexin/ GM130 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells HCT116 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins TNFSF10/ CD81/ CD63 Not detected contaminants GM130/ Calnexin Characterization: RNA analysis RNA analysis Type RNAsequencing Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	3/14	Homo sapiens	HCT116-AKT1/2 del/del	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	13%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 13% (34th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: CD81/ CD63 non-EV: Calnexin/ GM130 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells HCT116-AKT1/2 del/del EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Calnexin/ GM130 Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	4/14	Homo sapiens	HCT116-AKT1/2 del/del	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	13%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 13% (34th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Akti-1/2 Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: CD81/ CD63 non-EV: Calnexin/ GM130 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells HCT116-AKT1/2 del/del EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Not determined Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Calnexin/ GM130 Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	1/14	Homo sapiens	MDA-MB-231	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	0%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDA-MB-231 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis None Protein Concentration Method Not determined Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	2/14	Homo sapiens	MDA-MB-231	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	0%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Akti-1/2 Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells MDA-MB-231 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis None Protein Concentration Method Not determined Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	7/14	Homo sapiens	A375	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	0%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells A375 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis None Protein Concentration Method Not determined Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	8/14	Homo sapiens	A375	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	0%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Akti-1/2 Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells A375 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis None Protein Concentration Method Not determined Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	11/14	Homo sapiens	PC9	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	0%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells PC9 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis None Protein Concentration Method Not determined Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	12/14	Homo sapiens	PC9	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	0%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Akti-1/2 Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells PC9 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis None Protein Concentration Method Not determined Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	13/14	Homo sapiens	AG11726	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	0%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells AG11726 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis None Protein Concentration Method Not determined Characterization: Lipid analysis No

	EV220054	14/14	Homo sapiens	AG11726	Total Exosome Isolation	Salony	2016	0%
Study summary Full title AKT Inhibition Promotes Nonautonomous Cancer Cell Survival. All authors Salony , Solé X, Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Ritsma L, Boukhali M, Lee JH, Chowdhury J, Ross KN, Haas W, Vasudevan S, Ramaswamy S Journal Mol Cancer Ther Abstract Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being e (show more...)Small molecule inhibitors of AKT (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) signaling are being evaluated in patients with various cancer types, but have so far proven therapeutically disappointing for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we treat cancer cells with subtherapeutic doses of Akti-1/2, an allosteric small molecule AKT inhibitor, in order to experimentally model pharmacologic inhibition of AKT signaling in vitro. We then apply a combined RNA, protein, and metabolite profiling approach to develop an integrated, multiscale, molecular snapshot of this "AKT(low)" cancer cell state. We find that AKT-inhibited cancer cells suppress thousands of mRNA transcripts, and proteins related to the cell cycle, ribosome, and protein translation. Surprisingly, however, these AKT-inhibited cells simultaneously upregulate a host of other proteins and metabolites posttranscriptionally, reflecting activation of their endo-vesiculo-membrane system, secretion of inflammatory proteins, and elaboration of extracellular microvesicles. Importantly, these microvesicles enable rapidly proliferating cancer cells of various types to better withstand different stress conditions, including serum deprivation, hypoxia, or cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro and xenografting in vivo. These findings suggest a model whereby cancer cells experiencing a partial inhibition of AKT signaling may actually promote the survival of neighbors through non-cell autonomous communication. (hide) EV-METRIC 0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Akti-1/2 Focus vesicles (shedding) microvesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture Commercial method Protein markers EV: None non-EV: None Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Homo sapiens Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells AG11726 EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Separation Method Commercial kit Total Exosome Isolation Characterization: Protein analysis None Protein Concentration Method Not determined Characterization: Lipid analysis No

				1 - 14 of 14

EV-TRACK ID	EV220054
species	Homo sapiens
sample type	Cell culture
cell type	MCF7	MCF7	HCT116	HCT116	HCT116-AKT1/2 del/del	HCT116-AKT1/2 del/del	MDA-MB-231	MDA-MB-231	A375	A375	PC9	PC9	AG11726	AG11726
condition	Control condition	Akti-1/2	Control condition	Akti-1/2	Control condition	Akti-1/2	Control condition	Akti-1/2	Control condition	Akti-1/2	Control condition	Akti-1/2	Control condition	Akti-1/2
separation protocol	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation	Total Exosome Isolation
Exp. nr.	5	6	9	10	3	4	1	2	7	8	11	12	13	14
EV-METRIC %	25	25	25	25	13	13	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data

Study summary

Study data