Search > Results

You searched for: EV210378 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 10 of 10

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV210378 9/10 Homo sapiens MCF-7 (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 44%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
44% (84th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MCF-7
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Wash: time (min)
70
Wash: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Lysis buffer provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
126
EV concentration
Yes
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
Report size (nm)
90
EV210378 7/10 Homo sapiens MCF10A (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 22%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
22% (59th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MCF10A
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Wash: time (min)
70
Wash: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Lysis buffer provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV210378 2/10 Homo sapiens HepG2 (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 14%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
14% (44th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HepG2
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Wash: time (min)
70
Wash: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV210378 3/10 Homo sapiens SGC7901 (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 14%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
14% (44th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
SGC7901
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Wash: time (min)
70
Wash: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV210378 5/10 Homo sapiens HeLa (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 14%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
14% (44th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HeLa
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Wash: time (min)
70
Wash: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ EpCAM/ CEA/ PTK7/ AFP/ PSMA/ PDGF
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV210378 1/10 Homo sapiens HepG2 (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: EpCAM/ CD63
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HepG2
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ EpCAM
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV210378 4/10 Homo sapiens SGC7901 (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
SGC7901
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV210378 6/10 Homo sapiens HeLa (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HeLa
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV210378 8/10 Homo sapiens MCF10A (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MCF10A
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV210378 10/10 Homo sapiens MCF-7 (d)(U)C
Filtration
Jin D 2018 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Jin D, Yang F, Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Wang F, Zhang GJ
Journal
Anal Chem
Abstract
Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surr (show more...)Tumor exosomes that inherit molecular markers from their parent cells are emerging as cellular "surrogates" in cancer diagnostics. Molecular profiling and detection of exosomes offer a noninvasive access to the state of cancer progression, yet are still technically challenging. Here we report an exosome-oriented, aptamer nanoprobe-based profiling (ExoAPP) assay to phenotype surface proteins and quantify cancerous exosomes in a facile mix-and-detect format. Our ExoAPP interfaces graphene oxide (GO) with target-responsive aptamers to profile exosomal markers across five cell types by complementing with enzyme-assisted exosome recycling, revealing a heterogeneous pattern.This assay achieves a detection limit down to 1.6 × 10 particles/mL, lowered by several orders of magnitude over other homogeneous protocols. Such a sensitive ExoAPP assay allows for monitoring epithelial-mesenchymal transition through heterogeneous exosomes without involving cellular internalization that often occurs in GO-based cargo delivery. Using ExoAPP to analyze blood samples from prostate cancer patients, we find that target exosome can be identified by surface PSMA, suggesting their potential in clinical diagnosis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MCF-7
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: speed (g)
20000
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
1 - 10 of 10
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV210378
species
Homo
sapiens
sample type
Cell
culture
cell type
MCF-7
MCF10A
HepG2
SGC7901
HeLa
HepG2
SGC7901
HeLa
MCF10A
MCF-7
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
Control
condition
separation protocol
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
dUC/
Filtration
Exp. nr.
9
7
2
3
5
1
4
6
8
10
EV-METRIC %
44
22
14
14
14
0
0
0
0
0