Search > Results
You searched for: EV200121 (EV-TRACK ID)
Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Details | EV-TRACK ID | Experiment nr. | Species | Sample type | Separation protocol | First author | Year | EV-METRIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV200121 | 3/6 | Homo sapiens | U87 glioblastoma |
(d)(U)C DG |
Keulers, Tom | 2021 | 78% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Tom G Keulers, Sten F Libregts, Joel E J Beaumont, Kim G Savelkouls, Johan Bussink, Hans Duimel, Ludwig Dubois, Marijke I Zonneveld, Carmen López-Iglesias, Karel Bezstarosti, Jeroen A Demmers, Marc Vooijs, Marca Wauben, Kasper M A Rouschop
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Tumour hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumours and contributes to tumour progression, metastasis deve (show more...)
EV-METRIC
78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Protein markers
EV: CD81/ CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.14
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biogenesis/cargo sorting
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
U87 glioblastoma
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
overnight (16h) at >=100,000g
Cell count
1.00E+07
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
0.4M
Highest density fraction
2.0M
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.15
Orientation
Bottom-up
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
200000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
12.4
Pelleting: duration (min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ CD81
Not detected EV-associated proteins
CD81/ CD63/ CD9
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
Particle analysis: flow cytometry
Flow cytometer type
influx
Hardware adjustment
customized influx
Calibration bead size
100
Report type
Not Reported
EV concentration
Yes
EM
EM-type
Cryo-EM
Image type
Close-up
|
||||||||
EV200121 | 1/6 | Homo sapiens | HT29 colon carcinoma |
(d)(U)C DG |
Keulers, Tom | 2021 | 67% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Tom G Keulers, Sten F Libregts, Joel E J Beaumont, Kim G Savelkouls, Johan Bussink, Hans Duimel, Ludwig Dubois, Marijke I Zonneveld, Carmen López-Iglesias, Karel Bezstarosti, Jeroen A Demmers, Marc Vooijs, Marca Wauben, Kasper M A Rouschop
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Tumour hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumours and contributes to tumour progression, metastasis deve (show more...)
EV-METRIC
67% (94th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Protein markers
EV: CD81/ CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.14
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biogenesis/cargo sorting
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HT29 colon carcinoma
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
overnight (16h) at >=100,000g
Cell count
1.00E+06
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
0.4M
Highest density fraction
2.0M
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.15
Orientation
Bottom-up
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
200000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
12.4
Pelleting: duration (min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ CD81
Not detected EV-associated proteins
CD81/ CD63/ CD9
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
TRPS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
100
Particle analysis: flow cytometry
Flow cytometer type
influx
Hardware adjustment
customized influx
Calibration bead size
100
Report type
Not Reported
EV concentration
Yes
|
||||||||
EV200121 | 2/6 | Homo sapiens | HT29 colon carcinoma |
(d)(U)C DG |
Keulers, Tom | 2021 | 67% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Tom G Keulers, Sten F Libregts, Joel E J Beaumont, Kim G Savelkouls, Johan Bussink, Hans Duimel, Ludwig Dubois, Marijke I Zonneveld, Carmen López-Iglesias, Karel Bezstarosti, Jeroen A Demmers, Marc Vooijs, Marca Wauben, Kasper M A Rouschop
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Tumour hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumours and contributes to tumour progression, metastasis deve (show more...)
EV-METRIC
67% (94th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
gabarapl1 KD hypoxia
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Protein markers
EV: CD81/ CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.14
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biogenesis/cargo sorting
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HT29 colon carcinoma
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
overnight (16h) at >=100,000g
Cell count
1.00E+06
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
0.4M
Highest density fraction
2.0M
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.15
Orientation
Bottom-up
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
200000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
12.4
Pelleting: duration (min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ CD81
Not detected EV-associated proteins
CD81/ CD63/ CD9
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
TRPS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
200
Particle analysis: flow cytometry
Flow cytometer type
influx
Hardware adjustment
customized influx
Calibration bead size
100
Report type
Not Reported
EV concentration
Yes
|
||||||||
EV200121 | 4/6 | Homo sapiens | U87 glioblastoma |
(d)(U)C DG |
Keulers, Tom | 2021 | 67% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Tom G Keulers, Sten F Libregts, Joel E J Beaumont, Kim G Savelkouls, Johan Bussink, Hans Duimel, Ludwig Dubois, Marijke I Zonneveld, Carmen López-Iglesias, Karel Bezstarosti, Jeroen A Demmers, Marc Vooijs, Marca Wauben, Kasper M A Rouschop
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Tumour hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumours and contributes to tumour progression, metastasis deve (show more...)
EV-METRIC
67% (94th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
gabarapl1 KD hypoxia
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Protein markers
EV: CD81/ CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.14
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biogenesis/cargo sorting
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
U87 glioblastoma
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
overnight (16h) at >=100,000g
Cell count
1.00E+07
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
0.4M
Highest density fraction
2.0M
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.15
Orientation
Bottom-up
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
200000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
12.4
Pelleting: duration (min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ CD81
Not detected EV-associated proteins
CD81/ CD63/ CD9
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
Particle analysis: flow cytometry
Flow cytometer type
influx
Hardware adjustment
customized influx
Calibration bead size
100
Report type
Not Reported
EV concentration
Yes
|
||||||||
EV200121 | 5/6 | Homo sapiens | Blood plasma |
(d)(U)C DG |
Keulers, Tom | 2021 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Tom G Keulers, Sten F Libregts, Joel E J Beaumont, Kim G Savelkouls, Johan Bussink, Hans Duimel, Ludwig Dubois, Marijke I Zonneveld, Carmen López-Iglesias, Karel Bezstarosti, Jeroen A Demmers, Marc Vooijs, Marca Wauben, Kasper M A Rouschop
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Tumour hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumours and contributes to tumour progression, metastasis deve (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (74th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.14
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biogenesis/cargo sorting
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
0.4M
Highest density fraction
2.0M
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.4
Sample volume (mL)
0,5
Orientation
Bottom-up
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
200000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
12.4
Pelleting: duration (min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
Report type
Not Reported
EV-concentration
Yes
|
||||||||
EV200121 | 6/6 | Homo sapiens | Blood plasma |
(d)(U)C DG |
Keulers, Tom | 2021 | 43% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Tom G Keulers, Sten F Libregts, Joel E J Beaumont, Kim G Savelkouls, Johan Bussink, Hans Duimel, Ludwig Dubois, Marijke I Zonneveld, Carmen López-Iglesias, Karel Bezstarosti, Jeroen A Demmers, Marc Vooijs, Marca Wauben, Kasper M A Rouschop
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles
Abstract
Tumour hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumours and contributes to tumour progression, metastasis deve (show more...)
EV-METRIC
43% (74th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
cancer
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.14
Show all info
Study aim
Function/Biogenesis/cargo sorting
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
0,4M
Highest density fraction
2.0M
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
12.4
Sample volume (mL)
0,5
Orientation
Bottom-up
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
200000
Duration (min)
960
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
12.4
Pelleting: duration (min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
Report type
Not Reported
EV-concentration
Yes
|
||||||||
1 - 6 of 6 |
EV-TRACK ID | EV200121 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
species | Homo sapiens | |||||
sample type | Cell culture | Cell culture | Cell culture | Cell culture | Blood plasma | Blood plasma |
cell type | U87 glioblastoma | HT29 colon carcinoma | HT29 colon carcinoma | U87 glioblastoma | NA | NA |
medium | EV-depleted medium | EV-depleted medium | EV-depleted medium | EV-depleted medium | NA | NA |
condition | Control condition | Control condition | gabarapl1 KD hypoxia | gabarapl1 KD hypoxia | Control condition | cancer |
separation protocol | dUC Density gradient | dUC Density gradient | dUC Density gradient | dUC Density gradient | dUC Density gradient | dUC Density gradient |
Exp. nr. | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
EV-METRIC % | 78 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 43 | 43 |