Search > Results

You searched for: EV200112 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV200112 1/2 Homo sapiens HUVEC (d)(U)C
Giraud, Romain 2022 67%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Romain Giraud, Anaïs Moyon, Stéphanie Simoncini, Anne-Claire Duchez, Vincent Nail, Corinne Chareyre, Ahlem Bouhlel, Laure Balasse, Samantha Fernandez, Loris Vallier, Guillaume Hache, Florence Sabatier, Françoise Dignat-George, Romaric Lacroix, Benjamin Guillet, Philippe Garrigue
Journal
Pharmaceutics
Abstract
Microvesicles, so-called endothelial large extracellular vesicles (LEVs), are of great interest as b (show more...)Microvesicles, so-called endothelial large extracellular vesicles (LEVs), are of great interest as biological markers and cell-free biotherapies in cardiovascular and oncologic diseases. However, their therapeutic perspectives remain limited due to the lack of reliable data regarding their systemic biodistribution after intravenous administration. Methods: Applied to a mouse model of peripheral ischemia, radiolabeled endothelial LEVs were tracked and their in vivo whole-body distribution was quantified by microSPECT/CT imaging. Hindlimb perfusion was followed by LASER Doppler and motility impairment function was evaluated up to day 28 post-ischemia. Results: Early and specific homing of LEVs to ischemic hind limbs was quantified on the day of ischemia and positively correlated with reperfusion intensity at a later stage on day 28 after ischemia, associated with an improved motility function. Conclusions: This concept is a major asset for investigating the biodistribution of LEVs issued from other cell types, including cancer, thus partly contributing to better knowledge and understanding of their fate after injection. (hide)
EV-METRIC
67% (94th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
No extra separation steps
Protein markers
EV: CD51/ CD63/ CD81/ CD31/ CD146/ caveolin/ ICAM1/ integrin beta 3
non-EV: Albumin
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HUVEC
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
90
Pelleting: rotor type
JA-30.50
Pelleting: speed (g)
70000
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
30
Wash: time (min)
90
Wash: Rotor Type
JA-30.50
Wash: speed (g)
70000
Other
Name other separation method
No extra separation steps
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Fluorometric assay (e.g. Qubit, NanoOrange,...)
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
Yes
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Lysis buffer provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ CD51/ caveolin/ integrin-beta3/ CD81
Not detected contaminants
Albumin
Flow cytometry aspecific beads
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD146/ ICAM1/ CD31
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
TRPS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
434.5
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up
Report size (nm)
434
EV200112 2/2 Homo sapiens HUVEC (d)(U)C
qEV
Giraud, Romain 2022 67%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Romain Giraud, Anaïs Moyon, Stéphanie Simoncini, Anne-Claire Duchez, Vincent Nail, Corinne Chareyre, Ahlem Bouhlel, Laure Balasse, Samantha Fernandez, Loris Vallier, Guillaume Hache, Florence Sabatier, Françoise Dignat-George, Romaric Lacroix, Benjamin Guillet, Philippe Garrigue
Journal
Pharmaceutics
Abstract
Microvesicles, so-called endothelial large extracellular vesicles (LEVs), are of great interest as b (show more...)Microvesicles, so-called endothelial large extracellular vesicles (LEVs), are of great interest as biological markers and cell-free biotherapies in cardiovascular and oncologic diseases. However, their therapeutic perspectives remain limited due to the lack of reliable data regarding their systemic biodistribution after intravenous administration. Methods: Applied to a mouse model of peripheral ischemia, radiolabeled endothelial LEVs were tracked and their in vivo whole-body distribution was quantified by microSPECT/CT imaging. Hindlimb perfusion was followed by LASER Doppler and motility impairment function was evaluated up to day 28 post-ischemia. Results: Early and specific homing of LEVs to ischemic hind limbs was quantified on the day of ischemia and positively correlated with reperfusion intensity at a later stage on day 28 after ischemia, associated with an improved motility function. Conclusions: This concept is a major asset for investigating the biodistribution of LEVs issued from other cell types, including cancer, thus partly contributing to better knowledge and understanding of their fate after injection. (hide)
EV-METRIC
67% (94th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Commercial method
Protein markers
EV: beta 3 integrin/ CD51/ CD63/ CD81/ CD31/ CD146/ caveolin/ ICAM1
non-EV: Albumin
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
HUVEC
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
90
Pelleting: rotor type
JA-30.50
Pelleting: speed (g)
70000
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
30
Wash: time (min)
90
Wash: Rotor Type
JA-30.50
Wash: speed (g)
70000
Commercial kit
qEV
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
BCA
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
Yes
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Lysis buffer provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ CD51/ caveolin/ integrin-beta3/ CD81
Not detected contaminants
Albumin
Flow cytometry aspecific beads
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD31/ CD146/ ICAM1
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
TRPS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
434.5
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up
Report size (nm)
407
1 - 2 of 2
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV200112
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
HUVEC
condition
Control condition
separation protocol
dUC
No extra separation steps
dUC
qEV
Exp. nr.
1
2
EV-METRIC %
67
67