Search > Results

You searched for: EV200094 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 7 of 7

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV200094 1/4 Vibrio cholerae C6706 (d)(U)C
UF
Filtration
Qing S 2020 29%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Qing S, Lyu C, Zhu L, Pan C, Wang S, Li F, Wang J, Yue H, Gao X, Jia R, Wei W, Ma G
Journal
Adv Mater
Abstract
The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy (show more...)The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are demonstrated as powerful immunostimulants for TME reprogramming. To overcome the obstacles of antibody-dependent clearance and high toxicity induced by OMVs upon intravenous injection (a classic clinically relevant delivery mode), calcium phosphate (CaP) shells are employed to cover the surface of OMVs, which enables potent OMV-based TME reprograming without side effects. Meanwhile, the pH-sensitive CaP shells facilitate the neutralization of acidic TME, leading to highly beneficial M2-to-M1 polarization of macrophages for improved antitumor effect. Moreover, the outer shells can be integrated with functional components like folic acid or photosensitizer agents, which facilitates the use of the OMV-based platform in combination therapies for a synergic therapeutic effect. (hide)
EV-METRIC
29% (67th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Other/ outer membrane vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Ultrafiltration
Filtration
No extra separation steps
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Vibrio cholerae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
C6706
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Cell count
1,30E+13
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 28
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm,
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Other
Name other separation method
No extra separation steps
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
microBCA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
43,6
EV200094 2/4 Shigella flexneri strain 301 (d)(U)C
UF
Filtration
Qing S 2020 29%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Qing S, Lyu C, Zhu L, Pan C, Wang S, Li F, Wang J, Yue H, Gao X, Jia R, Wei W, Ma G
Journal
Adv Mater
Abstract
The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy (show more...)The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are demonstrated as powerful immunostimulants for TME reprogramming. To overcome the obstacles of antibody-dependent clearance and high toxicity induced by OMVs upon intravenous injection (a classic clinically relevant delivery mode), calcium phosphate (CaP) shells are employed to cover the surface of OMVs, which enables potent OMV-based TME reprograming without side effects. Meanwhile, the pH-sensitive CaP shells facilitate the neutralization of acidic TME, leading to highly beneficial M2-to-M1 polarization of macrophages for improved antitumor effect. Moreover, the outer shells can be integrated with functional components like folic acid or photosensitizer agents, which facilitates the use of the OMV-based platform in combination therapies for a synergic therapeutic effect. (hide)
EV-METRIC
29% (67th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Other/ outer membrane vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Ultrafiltration
Filtration
No extra separation steps
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Shigella flexneri
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
strain 301
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Cell count
1,41E+13
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 28
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm,
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Other
Name other separation method
No extra separation steps
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
microBCA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
43,2
EV200094 3/4 Escherichia coli BL21 (d)(U)C
UF
Filtration
Qing S 2020 29%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Qing S, Lyu C, Zhu L, Pan C, Wang S, Li F, Wang J, Yue H, Gao X, Jia R, Wei W, Ma G
Journal
Adv Mater
Abstract
The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy (show more...)The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are demonstrated as powerful immunostimulants for TME reprogramming. To overcome the obstacles of antibody-dependent clearance and high toxicity induced by OMVs upon intravenous injection (a classic clinically relevant delivery mode), calcium phosphate (CaP) shells are employed to cover the surface of OMVs, which enables potent OMV-based TME reprograming without side effects. Meanwhile, the pH-sensitive CaP shells facilitate the neutralization of acidic TME, leading to highly beneficial M2-to-M1 polarization of macrophages for improved antitumor effect. Moreover, the outer shells can be integrated with functional components like folic acid or photosensitizer agents, which facilitates the use of the OMV-based platform in combination therapies for a synergic therapeutic effect. (hide)
EV-METRIC
29% (67th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Other/ outer membrane vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Ultrafiltration
Filtration
No extra separation steps
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Escherichia coli
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
BL21
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Cell count
8,36E+12
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 28
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm,
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Other
Name other separation method
No extra separation steps
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
microBCA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
42,5
EV200094 4/4 Escherichia coli DH5 (d)(U)C
UF
Filtration
Qing S 2020 29%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Qing S, Lyu C, Zhu L, Pan C, Wang S, Li F, Wang J, Yue H, Gao X, Jia R, Wei W, Ma G
Journal
Adv Mater
Abstract
The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy (show more...)The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are demonstrated as powerful immunostimulants for TME reprogramming. To overcome the obstacles of antibody-dependent clearance and high toxicity induced by OMVs upon intravenous injection (a classic clinically relevant delivery mode), calcium phosphate (CaP) shells are employed to cover the surface of OMVs, which enables potent OMV-based TME reprograming without side effects. Meanwhile, the pH-sensitive CaP shells facilitate the neutralization of acidic TME, leading to highly beneficial M2-to-M1 polarization of macrophages for improved antitumor effect. Moreover, the outer shells can be integrated with functional components like folic acid or photosensitizer agents, which facilitates the use of the OMV-based platform in combination therapies for a synergic therapeutic effect. (hide)
EV-METRIC
29% (67th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Other/ outer membrane vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Ultrafiltration
Filtration
No extra separation steps
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Escherichia coli
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
DH5
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Cell count
4,15E+12
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 28
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm,
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
100
Membrane type
Polyethersulfone (PES)
Other
Name other separation method
No extra separation steps
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
microBCA
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Size range/distribution
Reported size (nm)
45
EV200094 1/3 Vibrio cholerae / not specified Qing S 2020 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Qing S, Lyu C, Zhu L, Pan C, Wang S, Li F, Wang J, Yue H, Gao X, Jia R, Wei W, Ma G
Journal
Adv Mater
Abstract
The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy (show more...)The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are demonstrated as powerful immunostimulants for TME reprogramming. To overcome the obstacles of antibody-dependent clearance and high toxicity induced by OMVs upon intravenous injection (a classic clinically relevant delivery mode), calcium phosphate (CaP) shells are employed to cover the surface of OMVs, which enables potent OMV-based TME reprograming without side effects. Meanwhile, the pH-sensitive CaP shells facilitate the neutralization of acidic TME, leading to highly beneficial M2-to-M1 polarization of macrophages for improved antitumor effect. Moreover, the outer shells can be integrated with functional components like folic acid or photosensitizer agents, which facilitates the use of the OMV-based platform in combination therapies for a synergic therapeutic effect. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Other
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
not specified
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Vibrio cholerae
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
/
Separation Method
Other
Name other separation method
not specified
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
40
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV200094 2/3 Shigella flexneri / NA Qing S 2020 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Qing S, Lyu C, Zhu L, Pan C, Wang S, Li F, Wang J, Yue H, Gao X, Jia R, Wei W, Ma G
Journal
Adv Mater
Abstract
The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy (show more...)The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are demonstrated as powerful immunostimulants for TME reprogramming. To overcome the obstacles of antibody-dependent clearance and high toxicity induced by OMVs upon intravenous injection (a classic clinically relevant delivery mode), calcium phosphate (CaP) shells are employed to cover the surface of OMVs, which enables potent OMV-based TME reprograming without side effects. Meanwhile, the pH-sensitive CaP shells facilitate the neutralization of acidic TME, leading to highly beneficial M2-to-M1 polarization of macrophages for improved antitumor effect. Moreover, the outer shells can be integrated with functional components like folic acid or photosensitizer agents, which facilitates the use of the OMV-based platform in combination therapies for a synergic therapeutic effect. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
NA
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Shigella flexneri
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
/
Separation Method
Other
Name other separation method
NA
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
EV200094 3/3 Escherichia coli DH5 NA Qing S 2020 0%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Qing S, Lyu C, Zhu L, Pan C, Wang S, Li F, Wang J, Yue H, Gao X, Jia R, Wei W, Ma G
Journal
Adv Mater
Abstract
The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy (show more...)The highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors often dampens the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are demonstrated as powerful immunostimulants for TME reprogramming. To overcome the obstacles of antibody-dependent clearance and high toxicity induced by OMVs upon intravenous injection (a classic clinically relevant delivery mode), calcium phosphate (CaP) shells are employed to cover the surface of OMVs, which enables potent OMV-based TME reprograming without side effects. Meanwhile, the pH-sensitive CaP shells facilitate the neutralization of acidic TME, leading to highly beneficial M2-to-M1 polarization of macrophages for improved antitumor effect. Moreover, the outer shells can be integrated with functional components like folic acid or photosensitizer agents, which facilitates the use of the OMV-based platform in combination therapies for a synergic therapeutic effect. (hide)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
NA
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Escherichia coli
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
DH5
Separation Method
Other
Name other separation method
NA
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Wide-field
1 - 7 of 7