Search > Results

You searched for: EV200025 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 4 of 4

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV200025 3/4 Homo sapiens Blood plasma UF
SEC (non-commercial)
cation-exchange chromatography
Van Deun J 2020 63%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Van Deun J, Jo A, Li H, Lin HY, Weissleder R, Im H, Lee H
Journal
Adv Biosyst
Abstract
Purifying extracellular vesicles (EVs) from complex biological fluids is a critical step in analyzin (show more...)Purifying extracellular vesicles (EVs) from complex biological fluids is a critical step in analyzing EVs molecularly. Plasma lipoprotein particles (LPPs) are a significant confounding factor as they outnumber EVs >10 -fold. Given their overlap in size, LPPs cannot be completely removed using standard size-exclusion chromatography. Density-based separation of LPPs can be applied but is impractical for routine use in clinical research and practice. Here a new separation approach, known as dual-mode chromatography (DMC), capable of enriching plasma EVs, and depleting LPPs is reported. DMC conveniently integrates two orthogonal separation steps in a single column device: i) size exclusion to remove high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) that are smaller than EVs/ and ii) cation exchange to clear positively charged ApoB100-containing LPPs, mostly (very) low-density lipoproteins (V)LDLs, from negatively charged EVs. The strategy enables DMC to deplete most LPPs (>97% of HDLs and >99% of (V)LDLs) from human plasma, while retaining EVs (>30% of input). Furthermore, the two-in-one operation is fast (15 min per sample) and equipment-free. With abundant LPPs removed, DMC-prepared samples facilitate EV identification in imaging analyses and improve the accuracy for EV protein analysis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
63% (90th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
Spiked with ES2 EVs
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Ultrafiltration
Size-exclusion chromatography (non-commercial)
cation-exchange chromatography
Protein markers
EV: CD63
non-EV: ApoA1/ ApoB100
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Size-exclusion chromatography
Total column volume (mL)
10
Sample volume/column (mL)
0.5
Resin type
Sepharose CL-4B
Other
Name other separation method
cation-exchange chromatography
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63
Detected contaminants
ApoA1
ELISA
Detected contaminants
ApoB100
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
EV200025 4/4 Homo sapiens Blood plasma UF
SEC (non-commercial)
Van Deun J 2020 63%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Van Deun J, Jo A, Li H, Lin HY, Weissleder R, Im H, Lee H
Journal
Adv Biosyst
Abstract
Purifying extracellular vesicles (EVs) from complex biological fluids is a critical step in analyzin (show more...)Purifying extracellular vesicles (EVs) from complex biological fluids is a critical step in analyzing EVs molecularly. Plasma lipoprotein particles (LPPs) are a significant confounding factor as they outnumber EVs >10 -fold. Given their overlap in size, LPPs cannot be completely removed using standard size-exclusion chromatography. Density-based separation of LPPs can be applied but is impractical for routine use in clinical research and practice. Here a new separation approach, known as dual-mode chromatography (DMC), capable of enriching plasma EVs, and depleting LPPs is reported. DMC conveniently integrates two orthogonal separation steps in a single column device: i) size exclusion to remove high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) that are smaller than EVs/ and ii) cation exchange to clear positively charged ApoB100-containing LPPs, mostly (very) low-density lipoproteins (V)LDLs, from negatively charged EVs. The strategy enables DMC to deplete most LPPs (>97% of HDLs and >99% of (V)LDLs) from human plasma, while retaining EVs (>30% of input). Furthermore, the two-in-one operation is fast (15 min per sample) and equipment-free. With abundant LPPs removed, DMC-prepared samples facilitate EV identification in imaging analyses and improve the accuracy for EV protein analysis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
63% (90th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
Spiked with ES2 EVs
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Ultrafiltration
Size-exclusion chromatography (non-commercial)
Protein markers
EV: CD63
non-EV: ApoA1/ ApoB100
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Size-exclusion chromatography
Total column volume (mL)
10
Sample volume/column (mL)
0.5
Resin type
Sepharose CL-4B
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63
Detected contaminants
ApoA1
ELISA
Detected contaminants
ApoB100
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
EV200025 1/4 Homo sapiens ES2 (d)(U)C
DG
UF
Van Deun J 2020 57%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Van Deun J, Jo A, Li H, Lin HY, Weissleder R, Im H, Lee H
Journal
Adv Biosyst
Abstract
Purifying extracellular vesicles (EVs) from complex biological fluids is a critical step in analyzin (show more...)Purifying extracellular vesicles (EVs) from complex biological fluids is a critical step in analyzing EVs molecularly. Plasma lipoprotein particles (LPPs) are a significant confounding factor as they outnumber EVs >10 -fold. Given their overlap in size, LPPs cannot be completely removed using standard size-exclusion chromatography. Density-based separation of LPPs can be applied but is impractical for routine use in clinical research and practice. Here a new separation approach, known as dual-mode chromatography (DMC), capable of enriching plasma EVs, and depleting LPPs is reported. DMC conveniently integrates two orthogonal separation steps in a single column device: i) size exclusion to remove high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) that are smaller than EVs/ and ii) cation exchange to clear positively charged ApoB100-containing LPPs, mostly (very) low-density lipoproteins (V)LDLs, from negatively charged EVs. The strategy enables DMC to deplete most LPPs (>97% of HDLs and >99% of (V)LDLs) from human plasma, while retaining EVs (>30% of input). Furthermore, the two-in-one operation is fast (15 min per sample) and equipment-free. With abundant LPPs removed, DMC-prepared samples facilitate EV identification in imaging analyses and improve the accuracy for EV protein analysis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
57% (91st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Ultrafiltration
Protein markers
EV: CD9/ CD63/ CD81
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.1
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
ES2
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
Commercial EDS
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
40%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
17
Sample volume (mL)
1
Orientation
Top-down
Rotor type
SW27.1 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Size-exclusion chromatography
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Size-exclusion chromatography
Resin type
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Flow cytometry specific beads
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ CD81
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
EV200025 2/4 Homo sapiens Gli36 EGFRvIII (d)(U)C
DG
UF
Van Deun J 2020 57%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Van Deun J, Jo A, Li H, Lin HY, Weissleder R, Im H, Lee H
Journal
Adv Biosyst
Abstract
Purifying extracellular vesicles (EVs) from complex biological fluids is a critical step in analyzin (show more...)Purifying extracellular vesicles (EVs) from complex biological fluids is a critical step in analyzing EVs molecularly. Plasma lipoprotein particles (LPPs) are a significant confounding factor as they outnumber EVs >10 -fold. Given their overlap in size, LPPs cannot be completely removed using standard size-exclusion chromatography. Density-based separation of LPPs can be applied but is impractical for routine use in clinical research and practice. Here a new separation approach, known as dual-mode chromatography (DMC), capable of enriching plasma EVs, and depleting LPPs is reported. DMC conveniently integrates two orthogonal separation steps in a single column device: i) size exclusion to remove high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) that are smaller than EVs/ and ii) cation exchange to clear positively charged ApoB100-containing LPPs, mostly (very) low-density lipoproteins (V)LDLs, from negatively charged EVs. The strategy enables DMC to deplete most LPPs (>97% of HDLs and >99% of (V)LDLs) from human plasma, while retaining EVs (>30% of input). Furthermore, the two-in-one operation is fast (15 min per sample) and equipment-free. With abundant LPPs removed, DMC-prepared samples facilitate EV identification in imaging analyses and improve the accuracy for EV protein analysis. (hide)
EV-METRIC
57% (91st percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Density gradient
Ultrafiltration
Protein markers
EV: CD9/ CD63/ CD81
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.1
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Gli36 EGFRvIII
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
Commercial EDS
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
40%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
17
Sample volume (mL)
1
Orientation
Top-down
Rotor type
SW27.1 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Size-exclusion chromatography
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Size-exclusion chromatography
Resin type
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Flow cytometry specific beads
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ CD81
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
1 - 4 of 4
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV200025
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Blood plasma
Blood plasma
Cell culture
Cell culture
cell type
NA
NA
ES2
Gli36 EGFRvIII
medium
NA
NA
EV-depleted medium
EV-depleted medium
condition
Spiked with ES2 EVs
Spiked with ES2 EVs
Control condition
Control condition
separation protocol
Ultrafiltration/
Size-exclusion chromatography
(non-commercial)/ cation-exchange
chromatography
Ultrafiltration/
Size-exclusion chromatography
(non-commercial)
dUC/
Density gradient/ Ultrafiltration
dUC/
Density gradient/ Ultrafiltration
Exp. nr.
3
4
1
2
EV-METRIC %
63
63
57
57