Search > Results
You searched for: EV180017 (EV-TRACK ID)
Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Details | EV-TRACK ID | Experiment nr. | Species | Sample type | Separation protocol | First author | Year | EV-METRIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV180017 | 1/5 | Homo sapiens | MDAMB231 |
DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF |
Beghein E | 2018 | 63% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Beghein E, Devriese D, Van Hoey E, Gettemans J
Journal
J Cell Sci
Abstract
Cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are increasingly being recognized as genuine invasi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
63% (93rd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
DG
(d)(U)C Filtration UF Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ CD63/ CD9/ MT1-MMP/ Flotillin-2
non-EV: Calnexin/ Golgin245/ PMP70/ CytochromeC Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting, Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MDAMB231
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
0.05
Highest density fraction
0.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.5
Orientation
Top-down (sample migrates downwards)
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
11
Pelleting: duration (min)
180
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
255.8
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9, CD63, Flotillin-2, TSG101, MT1-MMP
Not detected contaminants
PMP70, CytochromeC, Calnexin, Golgin245
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
131
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
4.95E+09 particles/million cells
|
||||||||
EV180017 | 2/5 | Homo sapiens | MDAMB231 |
DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF |
Beghein E | 2018 | 62% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Beghein E, Devriese D, Van Hoey E, Gettemans J
Journal
J Cell Sci
Abstract
Cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are increasingly being recognized as genuine invasi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
62% (92nd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Expressing fascin nanobody
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
DG
(d)(U)C Filtration UF Protein markers
EV: CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting, Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MDAMB231
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
0.05
Highest density fraction
0.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.5
Orientation
Top-down (sample migrates downwards)
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
11
Pelleting: duration (min)
180
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
255.8
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9, CD63
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
142
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
2.25E+10 particles/million cells
|
||||||||
EV180017 | 5/5 | Homo sapiens | MDAMB231 |
DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF |
Beghein E | 2018 | 62% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Beghein E, Devriese D, Van Hoey E, Gettemans J
Journal
J Cell Sci
Abstract
Cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are increasingly being recognized as genuine invasi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
62% (92nd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Expressing cortactin nanobody (NTA domain)
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
DG
(d)(U)C Filtration UF Protein markers
EV: CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting, Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MDAMB231
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
0.05
Highest density fraction
0.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.5
Orientation
Top-down (sample migrates downwards)
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
11
Pelleting: duration (min)
180
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
255.8
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9, CD63
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
133
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
1.16E+09 particles/million cells
|
||||||||
EV180017 | 3/5 | Homo sapiens | MDAMB231 |
DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF |
Beghein E | 2018 | 50% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Beghein E, Devriese D, Van Hoey E, Gettemans J
Journal
J Cell Sci
Abstract
Cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are increasingly being recognized as genuine invasi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
50% (87th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Expressing cortactin nanobody (SH3 domain)
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
DG
(d)(U)C Filtration UF Protein markers
EV: CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting, Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MDAMB231
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
0.05
Highest density fraction
0.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.5
Orientation
Top-down (sample migrates downwards)
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
11
Pelleting: duration (min)
180
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
255.8
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9, CD63
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
133
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
9.79E+09 particles/million cells
|
||||||||
EV180017 | 4/5 | Homo sapiens | MDAMB231 |
DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF |
Beghein E | 2018 | 50% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Beghein E, Devriese D, Van Hoey E, Gettemans J
Journal
J Cell Sci
Abstract
Cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are increasingly being recognized as genuine invasi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
50% (87th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Expressing gelsolin nanobody
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
DG
(d)(U)C Filtration UF Protein markers
EV: CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/cargo sorting, Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
MDAMB231
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Pelleting performed
No
Density gradient
Type
Discontinuous
Number of initial discontinuous layers
4
Lowest density fraction
0.05
Highest density fraction
0.4
Sample volume (mL)
0.5
Orientation
Top-down (sample migrates downwards)
Rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
1
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
11
Pelleting: duration (min)
180
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 41 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
255.8
Filtration steps
0.45µm > x > 0.22µm, 0.22µm or 0.2µm
Ultra filtration
Cut-off size (kDa)
10
Membrane type
Regenerated cellulose
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9, CD63
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
128
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
1.97E+09 particles/million cells
|
||||||||
1 - 5 of 5 |
EV-TRACK ID | EV180017 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
species | Homo sapiens | ||||
sample type | Cell culture | ||||
cell type | MDAMB231 | ||||
condition | Control condition | Expressing fascin nanobody | Expressing cortactin nanobody (NTA domain) | Expressing cortactin nanobody (SH3 domain) | Expressing gelsolin nanobody |
separation protocol | DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF | DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF | DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF | DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF | DG (d)(U)C Filtration UF |
Exp. nr. | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
EV-METRIC % | 63 | 62 | 62 | 50 | 50 |