Search > Results

You searched for: EV200013 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV200013 1/2 Bos taurus Bovine ampulla oviductal fluid DG
qEV
Asaadi, Anise 2021 75%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Anise Asaadi, Nima Azari Dolatabad, Hadi Atashi, Annelies Raes, Petra Van Damme, Michael Hoelker, An Hendrix, Osvaldo Bogado Pascottini, Ann Van Soom, Mojtaba Kafi, Krishna Chaitanya Pavani
Journal
Int J Biol Sci
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been isolated from follicular (FF) and ampullary oviduct fluid (AO (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been isolated from follicular (FF) and ampullary oviduct fluid (AOF), using different isolation methods. However, it is not clear whether different purification methods can affect the functionality of resulting EVs. Here, we compared two methods (OptiPrep™ density gradient ultracentrifugation (ODG UC) and single-step size exclusion chromatography (SEC) (qEV IZON™ single column)) for the isolation of EVs from bovine FF and AOF. Additionally, we evaluated whether the addition of EVs derived either by ODG UC or SEC from FF or AOF during oocyte maturation would yield extra benefits for embryo developmental competence. The characterization of EVs isolated using ODG UC or SEC from FF and AOF did not show any differences in terms of EV sizes (40-400 nm) and concentrations (2.4 ± 0.2 × 1012-1.8 ± 0.2 × 1013 particles/mL). Blastocyst yield and quality was higher in groups supplemented with EVs isolated from FF and AOF by ODG UC, with higher total cell numbers and a lower apoptotic cell ratio compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). Supplementing in vitro maturation media with EVs derived by ODG UC from AOF was beneficial for bovine embryo development and quality. (hide)
EV-METRIC
75% (50th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Bovine ampulla oviductal fluid
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density gradient
Commercial method
Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.1
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Bos taurus
Sample Type
Bovine ampulla oviductal fluid
Separation Method
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
40%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
16.8
Sample volume (mL)
1
Orientation
Top-down
Rotor type
SW 32.1 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
2
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
14
Pelleting: duration (min)
180
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32.1 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Commercial kit
qEV
Characterization: Protein analysis
PMID previous EV protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
Yes
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Lysis buffer provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ TSG101
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
PMID previous EV particle analysis
Extra particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
165 +/- 5.8 nm
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
Yes, as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample 1.80E+12
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up
EV200013 2/2 Bos taurus Bovine ovarian follicular fluid DG
qEV
Asaadi, Anise 2021 75%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Anise Asaadi, Nima Azari Dolatabad, Hadi Atashi, Annelies Raes, Petra Van Damme, Michael Hoelker, An Hendrix, Osvaldo Bogado Pascottini, Ann Van Soom, Mojtaba Kafi, Krishna Chaitanya Pavani
Journal
Int J Biol Sci
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been isolated from follicular (FF) and ampullary oviduct fluid (AO (show more...)Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been isolated from follicular (FF) and ampullary oviduct fluid (AOF), using different isolation methods. However, it is not clear whether different purification methods can affect the functionality of resulting EVs. Here, we compared two methods (OptiPrep™ density gradient ultracentrifugation (ODG UC) and single-step size exclusion chromatography (SEC) (qEV IZON™ single column)) for the isolation of EVs from bovine FF and AOF. Additionally, we evaluated whether the addition of EVs derived either by ODG UC or SEC from FF or AOF during oocyte maturation would yield extra benefits for embryo developmental competence. The characterization of EVs isolated using ODG UC or SEC from FF and AOF did not show any differences in terms of EV sizes (40-400 nm) and concentrations (2.4 ± 0.2 × 1012-1.8 ± 0.2 × 1013 particles/mL). Blastocyst yield and quality was higher in groups supplemented with EVs isolated from FF and AOF by ODG UC, with higher total cell numbers and a lower apoptotic cell ratio compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). Supplementing in vitro maturation media with EVs derived by ODG UC from AOF was beneficial for bovine embryo development and quality. (hide)
EV-METRIC
75% (50th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Bovine ovarian follicular fluid
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Density gradient
Commercial method
Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.1
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Bos taurus
Sample Type
Bovine ovarian follicular fluid
Separation Method
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Type
Continuous
Lowest density fraction
5%
Highest density fraction
40%
Total gradient volume, incl. sample (mL)
16.8
Sample volume (mL)
1
Orientation
Top-down
Rotor type
SW 32.1 Ti
Speed (g)
100000
Duration (min)
1080
Fraction volume (mL)
2
Fraction processing
Centrifugation
Pelleting: volume per fraction
14
Pelleting: duration (min)
180
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 32.1 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
100000
Commercial kit
qEV
Characterization: Protein analysis
PMID previous EV protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
Yes
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Lysis buffer provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ TSG101
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
PMID previous EV particle analysis
Extra particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
166.9 +/- 9.7
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
Yes, as number of particles per milliliter of starting sample 6.44E+12
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up
1 - 2 of 2
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV200013
species
Bos taurus
sample type
Bovine
ampulla oviductal fluid
Bovine
ovarian follicular fluid
condition
Control condition
Control condition
separation protocol
Density gradient
qEV
Density gradient
qEV
Exp. nr.
1
2
EV-METRIC %
75
75