EV-TRACK

Search > Results

You searched for: EV190104 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2

Results list Study Tree

Details	EV-TRACK ID	Experiment nr.	Species	Sample type	Separation protocol	First author	Year	EV-METRIC
	EV190104	1/2	Mus musculus	32D	(d)(U)C	Swatler J	2019	78%
Study summary Full title Chronic myeloid leukemia-derived extracellular vesicles increase Foxp3 level and suppressive activity of thymic regulatory T cells. All authors Swatler J, Dudka W, Bugajski L, Brewinska-Olchowik M, Kozlowska E, Piwocka K. Journal Eur J Immunol Abstract Mechanisms driving immunosuppression in chronic myeloid leukemia are mostly unknown. We show that le (show more...)Mechanisms driving immunosuppression in chronic myeloid leukemia are mostly unknown. We show that leukemic extracellular vesicles (EVs) target lymphocytes and amplify suppressive function of thymic regulatory T cells, by driving expression of Foxp3 transcription factor. This could facilitate expansion of leukemic cells outside the bone marrow, leading to blast crisis. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (d)(U)C Protein markers EV: Flotillin1/ Alix/ beta-actin/ TSG101/ HSP70/ CD81 non-EV: Grp78/ TOM20 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells 32D EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Not specified Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 100 Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 140000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 55 Wash: time (min) 100 Wash: Rotor Type Type 45 Ti Wash: speed (g) 140000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Bradford Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ Alix/ beta-actin/ TSG101/ HSP70/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Grp78/ TOM20 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 120 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

	EV190104	2/2	Mus musculus	32D	(d)(U)C	Swatler J	2019	78%
Study summary Full title Chronic myeloid leukemia-derived extracellular vesicles increase Foxp3 level and suppressive activity of thymic regulatory T cells. All authors Swatler J, Dudka W, Bugajski L, Brewinska-Olchowik M, Kozlowska E, Piwocka K. Journal Eur J Immunol Abstract Mechanisms driving immunosuppression in chronic myeloid leukemia are mostly unknown. We show that le (show more...)Mechanisms driving immunosuppression in chronic myeloid leukemia are mostly unknown. We show that leukemic extracellular vesicles (EVs) target lymphocytes and amplify suppressive function of thymic regulatory T cells, by driving expression of Foxp3 transcription factor. This could facilitate expansion of leukemic cells outside the bone marrow, leading to blast crisis. (hide) EV-METRIC 78% (97th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin chronic myeloid leukemia (overexpresssion of BCR-ABL) Focus vesicles extracellular vesicle Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture (d)(U)C Protein markers EV: Flotillin1/ Alix/ beta-actin/ TSG101/ HSP70/ CD81 non-EV: Grp78/ TOM20 Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells 32D EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted medium Preparation of EDS Not specified Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed Yes Pelleting: time(min) 100 Pelleting: rotor type Type 45 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 140000 Wash: volume per pellet (ml) 55 Wash: time (min) 100 Wash: Rotor Type Type 45 Ti Wash: speed (g) 140000 Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method Bradford Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins Flotillin1/ Alix/ beta-actin/ TSG101/ HSP70/ CD81 Not detected contaminants Grp78/ TOM20 Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Mean Reported size (nm) 135.9 EM EM-type Transmission-EM Image type Close-up, Wide-field

				1 - 2 of 2

EV-TRACK ID	EV190104
species	Mus musculus
sample type	Cell culture
cell type	32D
condition	Control condition	chronic myeloid leukemia (overexpresssion of BCR-ABL)
separation protocol	(d)(U)C	(d)(U)C
Exp. nr.	1	2
EV-METRIC %	78	78