EV-TRACK

Search > Results

You searched for: EV160001 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Results list Study Tree

Details	EV-TRACK ID	Experiment nr.	Species	Sample type	Separation protocol	First author	Year	EV-METRIC
	EV160001	1/1	Mus musculus	B16F10, JAWSII	DG (d)(U)C	Stremersch S	2016	87%
Study summary Full title Comparing exosome-like vesicles with liposomes for the functional cellular delivery of small RNAs. All authors Stremersch S, Vandenbroucke RE, Van Wonterghem E, Hendrix A, De Smedt SC, Raemdonck K Journal J Control Release Abstract Exosome-like vesicles (ELVs) play an important role in intercellular communication by acting as natu (show more...)Exosome-like vesicles (ELVs) play an important role in intercellular communication by acting as natural carriers for biomolecule transfer between cells. This unique feature rationalizes their exploitation as bio-inspired drug delivery systems. However, the therapeutic application of ELVs is hampered by the lack of efficient and reproducible drug loading methods, in particular for therapeutic macromolecules. To overcome this limitation, we present a generic method to attach siRNA to the surface of isolated ELVs by means of a cholesterol anchor. Despite a feasible uptake in both a dendritic and lung epithelial cell line, B16F10- and JAWSII-derived ELVs were unable to functionally deliver the associated small RNAs, neither exogenous cholesterol-conjugated siRNA nor endogenous miRNA derived from the melanoma producer cell. The latter results were confirmed both for purified ELVs and ELVs delivered via a transwell co-culture set-up. In contrast, simple anionic fusogenic liposomes were able to induce a marked siRNA-mediated gene knockdown under equal experimental conditions, both indicating successful cytosolic delivery of surface-bound cholesterol-conjugated siRNA and further underscoring the incapacity of the here evaluated ELVs to guide cytosolic delivery of small RNAs. In conclusion, we demonstrate that a more in-depth understanding of the biomolecular delivery mechanism and specificity is required before ELVs can be envisioned as a generic siRNA carrier. (hide) EV-METRIC 87% (98th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type) Reported Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched proteins Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins non EV-enriched protein Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein qualitative and quantitative analysis Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected. electron microscopy images Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image density gradient Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs EV density Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density ultracentrifugation specifics Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps antibody specifics Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution lysate preparation Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition Study data Sample type Cell culture supernatant Sample origin Control condition Focus vesicles exosome-like vesicles Separation protocol Separation protocol Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol. dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation DG = density gradient UF = ultrafiltration SEC = size-exclusion chromatography IAF = immuno-affinity capture DG (d)(U)C Protein markers EV: CD81/ HSP70/ beta-actin/ CD63 non-EV: GM130/ Calreticulin Proteomics no Show all info Study aim Function, Mechanism of uptake/transfer Sample Species Mus musculus Sample Type Cell culture supernatant EV-producing cells B16F10, JAWSII EV-harvesting Medium EV-depleted serum Preparation of EDS Ultrafiltration (MWCO 300 kDa) Cell viability (%) NA Separation Method (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation dUC: centrifugation steps Below or equal to 800 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed No Density gradient Only used for validation of main results Yes Density medium 115.5 Type Discontinuous Number of initial discontinuous layers 5 Lowest density fraction 0.125 Highest density fraction 0.5 Sample volume (mL) 1 Orientation Top-down (sample migrates downwards) Rotor type SW 55 Ti Speed (g) 200000 Duration (min) 900 Fraction volume (mL) 1 Fraction processing Centrifugation Pelleting: volume per fraction 5 Pelleting: duration (min) 150 Pelleting: rotor type SW 55 Ti Pelleting: speed (g) 120000 Pelleting: adjusted k-factor 115.5 Pelleting-wash: volume per pellet (mL) 5 Pelleting-wash: duration (min) 70 Pelleting-wash: rotor type 115.5 Pelleting-wash: speed (g) SW 55 Ti Pelleting-wash: adjusted k-factor 115.5 EV-subtype Used subtypes NO Characterization: Protein analysis Protein Concentration Method BCA Western Blot Detected EV-associated proteins CD63, CD81, HSP70, beta-actin Flow cytometry specific beads Selected surface protein(s) CD63 Characterization: RNA analysis Database No Proteinase treatment No RNAse treatment No Characterization: Lipid analysis No Characterization: Particle analysis NTA Report type Size range/distribution Reported size (nm) 30-300 EV concentration Yes Particle yield 1000 EM EM-type Cryo-EM Image type Close-up

				1 - 1 of 1

EV-TRACK ID	EV160001
species	Mus musculus
sample type	Cell culture
cell type	B16F10 JAWSII
condition	Control condition
separation protocol	DG (d)(U)C
Exp. nr.	1
EV-METRIC %	87