Search > Results

You searched for: EV140410 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV140410 1/1 Homo sapiens NAY (d)(U)C
DC
Wang JJ 2014 14%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Wang JJ, Chen C, Xie PF, Pan Y, Tan YH, Tang LJ
Journal
Microbes Infect
Abstract
The role of exosomes shed from Mycobacterium avium sp. paratuberculosis-infected macrophages in inte (show more...)The role of exosomes shed from Mycobacterium avium sp. paratuberculosis-infected macrophages in intercellular communication processes was examined. We compared the responses of resting macrophages infected with M. avium sp. paratuberculosis with those of resting macrophages treated with exosomes previously released from macrophages infected with M. avium sp. paratuberculosis. Some proteins components of exosomes released from resting macrophages infected with M. avium sp. paratuberculosis showed a significantly differential expression compared with exosomes from uninfected-macrophages. Both M. avium sp. paratuberculosis and exosomes from infected-cells enhanced the expression of CD80 and CD86 and the secretion of TNF-? and IFN-? by macrophages. This suggests that exosomes from infected macrophages may be carriers of molecules, e.g. bacterial antigens and/or components from infected macrophages, that can elicit responses in resting cells. Two-dimensional analysis of the proteins present in exosomes from M. avium sp. paratuberculosis-infected macrophages compared with those from resting cells resulted in the identification by MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry of the following differentially expressed proteins: two actin isoforms, guanine nucleotide-binding protein ?-1, cofilin-1 and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A. The possible relevance of the changes observed and the biological functions of the proteins differentially present are discussed. (hide)
EV-METRIC
14% (44th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
DC
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV:
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Omics
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Characterization: Protein analysis
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV140410
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
NAY
condition
NAY
separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DC
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
14