Search > Results

You searched for: EV120162 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV120162 1/1 Homo sapiens Urine (d)(U)C Trnka P 2012 14%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Trnka P, Ivanova L, Hiatt MJ, Matsell DG
Journal
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obstructive nephropathy is a leading cause of CKD in children. The assess (show more...)BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obstructive nephropathy is a leading cause of CKD in children. The assessment of severity of renal impairment and the prediction of which children will progress to renal failure are, however, challenging. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This case-control study measured the urinary excretion of candidate biomarkers in 27 prevalent case-patients with posterior urethral valves (PUVs) and 20 age-matched controls, correlated their urinary concentration with GFR, and analyzed receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and regression analyses to assess their performance as tests for low GFR. RESULTS: The median urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio was higher in children with PUV (45 g/mol; range, 5-361 g/mol) than in controls (7 g/mol; range, 3-43 g/mol) (P<0.01) and correlated inversely with renal function (r = -0.44; P<0.05). In whole urine, excretion of aquaporin-2 was significantly decreased, whereas that of TGF? and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) was significantly increased. Whole-urine TGF? excretion correlated inversely with GFR (r = -0.53; P<0.05). As tests for low GFR, whole-urine TGF?, L1CAM, and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio performed best, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.788, 0.795, and 0.814, respectively. By linear regression analysis, whole-urine TGF?, L1CAM, and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio were associated with low GFR in the case-patients. CONCLUSIONS: Candidate biomarkers of obstructive nephropathy can be readily measured in whole urine and in urine exosomes. In boys with PUV, these biomarkers correlate with GFR. (hide)
EV-METRIC
14% (40th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
Adj. k-factor
138.3 (pelleting)
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV:
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Equal to or above 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
SW40
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
138.3
1 - 1 of 1
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV120162
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Urine
condition
NAY
separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Exp. nr.
1
EV-METRIC %
14