Search > Results
You searched for: EV100012 (EV-TRACK ID)
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
Details | EV-TRACK ID | Experiment nr. | Species | Sample type | Separation protocol | First author | Year | EV-METRIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV100012 | 1/2 | Mus musculus | Urine |
(d)(U)C DC Filtration |
Conde-Vancells J | 2010 | 33% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Conde-Vancells J, Rodriguez-Suarez E, Gonzalez E, Berisa A, Gil D, Embade N, Valle M, Luka Z, Elortza F, Wagner C, Lu SC, Mato JM, Falcon-Perez M
Journal
Proteomics Clin Appl
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is a compelling clinical imperative to identify discerning molecular biomarkers of he (show more...)
EV-METRIC
33% (65th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Exosome-like vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DC Filtration Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ CD63/ LimpII/ AQP1/ CD81/ Slc3a1/ Flotillin/ CD26/ PrP/ CD10/ HSP70
non-EV: Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein Proteomics
yes
TEM measurements
95.8+-50.7
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker
Sample
Species
Mus musculus
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ CD81/ HSP70/ TSG101/ CD26/ CD10/ LimpII/ PrP/ Slc3a1/ AQP1/ Flotillin
Detected contaminants
Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein
ELISA
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD26/ CD10/ LimpII/ PrP/ Slc3a1/ AQP1/ Flotillin
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
cryo EM
Image type
Close-up
Report size (nm)
95.8+-50.7
|
||||||||
EV100012 | 2/2 | Rattus norvegicus/rattus | Urine |
(d)(U)C DG Filtration |
Conde-Vancells J | 2010 | 33% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Conde-Vancells J, Rodriguez-Suarez E, Gonzalez E, Berisa A, Gil D, Embade N, Valle M, Luka Z, Elortza F, Wagner C, Lu SC, Mato JM, Falcon-Perez M
Journal
Proteomics Clin Appl
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is a compelling clinical imperative to identify discerning molecular biomarkers of he (show more...)
EV-METRIC
33% (65th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Exosome-like vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DG Filtration Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ Caveolin/ CD63/ CD81/ Slc3a1/ Flotillin/ CD10
non-EV: Proteomics
no
EV density (g/ml)
1.18;1.246;1.252
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker
Sample
Species
Rattus norvegicus/rattus
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Lowest density fraction
0.25
Highest density fraction
2.5
Orientation
Bottom-up
Rotor type
TLA110
Speed (g)
210000
Pelleting-wash: volume per pellet (mL)
2
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ CD81/ TSG101/ CD10/ Slc3a1/ Caveolin/ Flotillin
ELISA
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD10/ Slc3a1/ Caveolin/ Flotillin
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
cryo EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
1 - 2 of 2 |
EV-TRACK ID | EV100012 | |
---|---|---|
species | Mus musculus | Rattus norvegicus/rattus |
sample type | Urine | Urine |
condition | NAY | NAY |
separation protocol | (d)(U)C DC Filtration | (d)(U)C DG Filtration |
Exp. nr. | 1 | 2 |
EV-METRIC % | 33 | 33 |