Search > Results
You searched for: 2010 (Year of publication)
Showing 101 - 131 of 131
Showing 101 - 131 of 131
Details | EV-TRACK ID | Experiment nr. | Species | Sample type | Separation protocol | First author | Year | EV-METRIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EV100090 | 1/1 | Mus musculus | Blood plasma | (d)(U)C | Tasaki M | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Tasaki M, Ueda M, Ochiai S, Tanabe Y, Murata S, Misumi Y, Su Y, Sun X, Shinriki S, Jono H, Shono M, Obayashi K, Ando Y
Journal
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
Abstract
Recent studies clearly demonstrated that several types of pathogenic amyloid proteins acted as agent (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (26th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Blood plasma
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ SAA
non-EV: Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Mus musculus
Sample Type
Blood plasma
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
120
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
TSG101/ SAA
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
SAA
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Close-up
|
||||||||
EV100054 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens | NAY | (d)(U)C | Sheldon H | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Sheldon H, Heikamp E, Turley H, Dragovic R, Thomas P, Oon CE, Leek R, Edelmann M, Kessler B, Sainson RC, Sargent I, Li JL, Harris AL
Journal
Blood
Abstract
Notch signaling is an evolutionary conserved pathway that is mediated by cell-cell contact. It is in (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ Beta-actin/ Rab5/ Beta-tubulin/ LAMP1
non-EV: Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
EV Depleted
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
TSG101/ LAMP1/ Rab5/ Beta-actin/ Beta-tubulin
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
LAMP1/ Rab5/ Beta-actin/ Beta-tubulin
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
|
||||||||
EV100052 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens | NAY |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Raychaudhuri M | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Raychaudhuri M, Mukhopadhyay D
Journal
J Alzheimers Dis
Abstract
The amyloid-beta protein precursor (AbetaPP) is processed by various proteases located along the end (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Filtration Protein markers
EV: HSP70
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/Sorting
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
Yes
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
HSP70
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV100081 | 1/1 | Canis familiaris | NAY | (d)(U)C | Komatsu T | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Komatsu T, Sato K, Otsuka Y, Arashiki N, Tanaka K, Tamahara S, Ono K, Inaba M
Journal
J Vet Med Sci
Abstract
Dogs can be divided into two genetic groups (a minor HK phenotype and a major LK phenotype) based on (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: Flotillin2
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Canis familiaris
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Flotillin2
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Flotillin2
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100078 | 1/1 | Salmo salar | NAY | (d)(U)C | Iliev DB | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Iliev DB, Jørgensen SM, Rode M, Krasnov A, Harneshaug I, Jørgensen JB
Journal
Dev Comp Immunol
Abstract
Major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) is encoded by polymorphic genes present in vertebr (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: MHC2
non-EV: Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/Sorting
Sample
Species
Salmo salar
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
MHC2
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
MHC2
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV100032 | 2/2 | Rattus norvegicus/rattus | NAY |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Guescini M | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Guescini M, Genedani S, Stocchi V, Agnati LF
Journal
J Neural Transm
Abstract
Cells can exchange information not only by means of chemical and/or electrical signals, but also via (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Filtration Protein markers
EV: Alix/ TSG101
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Omics
Sample
Species
Rattus norvegicus/rattus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
13
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
Yes
Antibody dilution provided?
Yes
Detected EV-associated proteins
Alix/ TSG101
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100039 | 1/1 | Cricetulus griseus | NAY |
(d)(U)C DG |
Fernández-Messina L | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
Differential mechanisms of shedding of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored NKG2D ligands
All authors
Fernández-Messina L, Ashiru O, Boutet P, Agüera-González S, Skepper JN, Reyburn HT, Valés-Gómez M
Journal
J Biol Chem
Abstract
Tumor cells release NKG2D ligands to evade NKG2D-mediated immune surveillance. The purpose of our in (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DG Protein markers
EV: CD63
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Cricetulus griseus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
120
Density gradient
Only used for validation of main results
Yes
Lowest density fraction
5
Highest density fraction
60
Orientation
Bottom-up
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV100076 | 1/1 | Mesocricetus auratus | NAY | (d)(U)C | Evdokimovskaya Y | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Evdokimovskaya Y, Skarga Y, Vrublevskaya V, Morenkov O
Journal
Cell Biol Int
Abstract
The HSPs (heat-shock proteins) of the 70-kDa family, the constitutively expressed HSC70 (cognate 70- (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: HSP70/ HSC70 Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Other/Secretion of HSP70 and HSC70
Sample
Species
Mesocricetus auratus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
serum free
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
300
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected contaminants
"HSP70/ HSC70"
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100065 | 2/2 | Homo sapiens | NAY | (d)(U)C | Emmanouilidou E | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Emmanouilidou E, Melachroinou K, Roumeliotis T, Garbis SD, Ntzouni M, Margaritis LH, Stefanis L, Vekrellis K
Journal
J Neurosci
Abstract
alpha-Synuclein is central in Parkinson's disease pathogenesis. Although initially alpha-synuclein w (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: Alix
non-EV: Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
EV Depleted
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
90
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Alix
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100036 | 1/1 | Mus musculus | NAY |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Chairoungdua A | 2010 | 11% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Chairoungdua A, Smith DL, Pochard P, Hull M, Caplan MJ
Journal
J Cell Biol
Abstract
CD82 and CD9 are tetraspanin membrane proteins that can function as suppressors of tumor metastasis. (show more...)
EV-METRIC
11% (30th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Filtration Protein markers
EV: HSP70/ Flotilin1
non-EV: Cell organelle protein Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Mus musculus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
EV Depleted
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Filtration steps
0.2µm > x > 0.1µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Flotilin1/ HSP70
Detected contaminants
Cell organelle protein
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV100101 | 1/1 | Cryptococcus neoformans | Fungus |
(d)(U)C UF |
Oliveira DL | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Oliveira DL, Freire-de-Lima CG, Nosanchuk JD, Casadevall A, Rodrigues ML, Nimrichter L
Journal
Infect Immun
Abstract
Cryptococcus neoformans and distantly related fungal species release extracellular vesicles that tra (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Fungus
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
UF Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Cryptococcus neoformans
Sample Type
Fungus
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100100 | 1/1 | Mus musculus | NAY | (d)(U)C | Eguchi M | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Eguchi M, Kikuchi Y
Journal
J Infect Dis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most antigens from intracellular bacteria or vaccines induce both humoral and cell-media (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Other/Salmonella Ag presentation
Sample
Species
Mus musculus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100069 | 2/2 | Homo sapiens | Serum | IAF | Meckes DG Jr | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Meckes DG Jr, Shair KH, Marquitz AR, Kung CP, Edwards RH, Raab-Traub N
Journal
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Abstract
The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) is expressed in multiple human maligna (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 13% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Serum
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
IAF
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Serum
Separation Method
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100099 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens | NAY |
(d)(U)C DC Filtration UF |
Zhang Y | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Zhang Y, Wu XH, Luo CL, Zhang JM, He BC, Chen G
Journal
Int J Mol Med
Abstract
Tumor-derived exosomes express tumor antigens, leading to their promising utility as tumor vaccines, (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DC Filtration UF Protein markers
EV: HSP70/ ICAM1
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed
No
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
HSP70/ ICAM1
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
ICAM1
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Close-up
|
||||||||
EV100068 | 1/2 | Homo sapiens | NAY |
(d)(U)C DC |
Webber J | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Webber J, Steadman R, Mason MD, Tabi Z, Clayton A
Journal
Cancer Res
Abstract
There is a growing interest in the cell-cell communication roles in cancer mediated by secreted vesi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DC Protein markers
EV: CD9
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
EV Depleted
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100093 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens | NAY | (d)(U)C | Wang K | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wang K, Zhang S, Weber J, Baxter D, Galas DJ
Journal
Nucleic Acids Res
Abstract
The discovery of microRNAs (miRNAs) as a new class of regulators of gene expression has triggered an (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/Sorting
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
serum free
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100092 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens | Pleural effusion |
(d)(U)C DC |
Wada J | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Wada J, Onishi H, Suzuki H, Yamasaki A, Nagai S, Morisaki T, Katano M
Journal
Anticancer Res
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study analysed the contribution of malignant-effusion derived exosomes (Eff-Ex) to (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 33% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Pleural effusion
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DC Protein markers
EV: HSP70/ MHC1
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Pleural effusion
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed
No
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
HSP70/ MHC1
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
MHC1
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Close-up
|
||||||||
EV100064 | 2/3 | Homo sapiens | Ascites |
(d)(U)C SEC |
Szajnik M | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Szajnik M, Czystowska M, Szczepanski MJ, Mandapathil M, Whiteside TL
Journal
PLoS One
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor-derived microvesicles (TMV) or exosomes are present in body fluids of patients wit (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 13% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Ascites
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
microvesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
SEC Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Ascites
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
120
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100064 | 3/3 | Homo sapiens | Serum |
(d)(U)C SEC |
Szajnik M | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Szajnik M, Czystowska M, Szczepanski MJ, Mandapathil M, Whiteside TL
Journal
PLoS One
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor-derived microvesicles (TMV) or exosomes are present in body fluids of patients wit (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 13% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Serum
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
microvesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
SEC Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Serum
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
120
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100089 | 1/1 | Rattus norvegicus/rattus | NAY | (d)(U)C | Subra C | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Subra C, Grand D, Laulagnier K, Stella A, Lambeau G, Paillasse M, De Medina P, Monsarrat B, Perret B, Silvente-Poirot S, Poirot M, Record M
Journal
J Lipid Res
Abstract
Exosomes are bioactive vesicles released from multivesicular bodies (MVB) by intact cells and partic (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biogenesis/Sorting
Sample
Species
Rattus norvegicus/rattus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
serum free
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
|
||||||||
EV100088 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens | NAY | (d)(U)C | Sreekumar PG | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Sreekumar PG, Kannan R, Kitamura M, Spee C, Barron E, Ryan SJ, Hinton DR
Journal
PLoS One
Abstract
?B crystallin is a chaperone protein with anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory functions and has bee (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: CD63
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
serum free
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
10
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM/ immune EM
EM protein
CD63
Image type
Close-up
|
||||||||
EV100087 | 1/1 | Mus musculus | NAY |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Schnitzer JK | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Schnitzer JK, Berzel S, Fajardo-Moser M, Remer KA, Moll H
Journal
Vaccine
Abstract
Upon loading with parasite antigen and adoptive transfer, dendritic cells (DC) are able to confer pr (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Filtration Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Mus musculus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
300
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
|
||||||||
EV100085 | 1/1 | Mus musculus | BALF |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Prado N | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Prado N, Cañamero M, Villalba M, RodrÃguez R, Batanero E
Journal
Mol Immunol
Abstract
Exosomes represent a new family of bioactive nanovesicles (30-100 nm in diameter) secreted by differ (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 13% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
BALF
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Filtration Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Mus musculus
Sample Type
BALF
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100084 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens | NAY |
(d)(U)C DC Filtration |
Park IW | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Park IW, He JJ
Journal
Virol J
Abstract
The convergence of HIV-1 budding and exosome biogenesis at late endosomal compartments called multiv (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DC Filtration Protein markers
EV: AChE/ Beta-actin
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Technical
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Pelleting performed
No
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Beta-actin/ AChE
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Beta-actin/ AChE
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV100070 | 1/5 | Homo sapiens | Urine |
Filtration UF |
Miranda KC | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Miranda KC, Bond DT, McKee M, Skog J, Panescu TG, Da Silva N, Brown D, Russo LM
Journal
Kidney Int
Abstract
Urinary exosomes or microvesicles are being studied intensively to identify potential new biomarkers (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 22% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes / microvesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
Filtration
UF Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100070 | 2/5 | Homo sapiens | Urine |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Miranda KC | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Miranda KC, Bond DT, McKee M, Skog J, Panescu TG, Da Silva N, Brown D, Russo LM
Journal
Kidney Int
Abstract
Urinary exosomes or microvesicles are being studied intensively to identify potential new biomarkers (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 22% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes / microvesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Filtration Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100070 | 3/5 | Homo sapiens | Urine |
(d)(U)C Filtration UF |
Miranda KC | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Miranda KC, Bond DT, McKee M, Skog J, Panescu TG, Da Silva N, Brown D, Russo LM
Journal
Kidney Int
Abstract
Urinary exosomes or microvesicles are being studied intensively to identify potential new biomarkers (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 22% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes / microvesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Filtration UF Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Pelleting performed
No
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100070 | 4/5 | Homo sapiens | Serum |
(d)(U)C Filtration |
Miranda KC | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Miranda KC, Bond DT, McKee M, Skog J, Panescu TG, Da Silva N, Brown D, Russo LM
Journal
Kidney Int
Abstract
Urinary exosomes or microvesicles are being studied intensively to identify potential new biomarkers (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 13% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Serum
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes / microvesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Filtration Protein markers
EV:
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Biomarker
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Serum
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Filtration steps
> 0.45 µm,
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100082 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens Cercopithecus aethiops |
NAY | (d)(U)C | Kosaka N | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Kosaka N, Iguchi H, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, Matsuki Y, Ochiya T
Journal
J Biol Chem
Abstract
The existence of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in the blood of cancer patients has raised the possi (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: Beta-actin/ CD63
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens / Cercopithecus aethiops
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
serum free
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
70
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
11
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD63/ Beta-actin
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Beta-actin
Characterization: Particle analysis
None
|
||||||||
EV100077 | 1/1 | Homo sapiens | Urine | (d)(U)C | Hara M | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Hara M, Yanagihara T, Hirayama Y, Ogasawara S, Kurosawa H, Sekine S, Kihara I
Journal
Hum Pathol
Abstract
Podocyte injury is involved in both the onset and progression of glomerular diseases. Our previous s (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 22% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
Membrane(-derived) vesicles
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
Protein markers
EV: Podocalyxin
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Other/Microvilli tip vesiculation
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Equal to or above 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
120
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Podocalyxin
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Podocalyxin
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
EV100072 | 1/1 | Mus musculus | NAY |
(d)(U)C DG |
Anand PK | 2010 | 0% | |
Study summaryFull title
All authors
Anand PK, Anand E, Bleck CK, Anes E, Griffiths G
Journal
PLoS One
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exosomes are endosome-derived vesicles that are released when multi-vesicular bodies (MV (show more...)
EV-METRIC
0% (median: 14% of all experiments on the same sample type)
Reported
Not reported Not applicable EV-enriched
proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non
EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative
and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron
microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density
gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody
specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate
preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study dataSample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
(d)(U)C
DG Protein markers
EV: HSP70/ Actin
non-EV: Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Mus musculus
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-harvesting Medium
EV Depleted
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 10,000 g and 50,000 g Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
120
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
HSP70/ Actin
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
Actin
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
immune EM
EM protein
HSP70
Image type
Wide-field
|
||||||||
101 - 131 of 131 | keyboard_arrow_left |