TRANSPARENT REPORTING AND CENTRALIZING KNOWLEDGE
IN EXTRACELLULAR VESICLE RESEARCH
chevron_left
Search About Reviewers & editors My EV-TRACK
chevron_right
Search > Results

You searched for: EV210027 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2

Results list Study Tree
Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV210027 1/2 Homo sapiens Primary adipose-derived stem cells (d)(U)C
Filtration 		Han, Yu-di 2018 34%

Study summary

Full title
Co-transplantation of exosomes derived from hypoxia-preconditioned adipose mesenchymal stem cells promotes neovascularization and graft survival in fat grafting
All authors
Yu-di Han, Yun Bai, Xin-Long Yan, Jing Ren, Quan Zeng, Xiao-Dong Li, Xue-Tao Pei, Yan Han
Journal
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
Abstract
Background: Adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs)-derived exosomes (ADSC-Exos) account for the proan (show more...)Background: Adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs)-derived exosomes (ADSC-Exos) account for the proangiogenic potential of stem cell. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ADSC-derived exosomes (ADSC-Exos) on the survival in fat grafting. Methods: A nude mouse model of subcutaneous fat grafting was adopted. Hypoxic preconditioned ADSC-Exos and ADSC-Exos were injected around the grafted tissue. The fat graft sample was weighed and examined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry. Laser Doppler flowmetry and CD31 immunofluorescence staining were used to analyze neovascularization. Results: ADSC-Exo and hypoxic ADSC-Exo groups had a significantly higher weight of fat graft and more perilipin-positive adipocytes than the control groups from 2 to 8 weeks after grafting, and the hypoxic ADSC-Exo group had better outcomes (all P < 0.05). H&E staining showed that ADSC-Exos attenuated infiltration of inflammatory cells around the fat grafts. Laser Doppler flowmetry showed that the two ADSC-Exo groups had better blood perfusion in the graft tissue than the control groups (all P < 0.05). Immunofluorescence demonstrated that the hypoxic ADSC-Exo group had significantly more CD31-positive cells than the ADSC-Exo group. In vitro study showed that hypoxic ADSC-Exos treatment significantly increased the migration (at 12 and 24 h) and in vitro capillary network formation (at 12 h) in the human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) as compared with the ADSC-Exo group and control group (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Co-transplantation of ADSC-Exos can effectively promote the survival of graft, neovascularization and attenuated inflammation in the fat grafts. Hypoxia treatment can further enhance the beneficial effect of ADSC-Exos. (hide)
EV-METRIC
34% (78th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Primary adipose-derived stem cells
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
Commercial EDS
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
Type 45 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
not specified
Wash: time (min)
60
Wash: Rotor Type
Type 45 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ TSG101
Flow cytometry specific beads
Antibody details provided?
No
Antibody dilution provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD9/ CD63/ TSG101
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
98
EV concentration
Yes
Particle yield
No NA
EM
EM-type
Transmission electron microscopy
Image type
Wide-field
EV210027 2/2 Homo sapiens Primary adipose-derived stem cells (d)(U)C
Filtration 		Han, Yu-di 2018 15%

Study summary

Full title
Co-transplantation of exosomes derived from hypoxia-preconditioned adipose mesenchymal stem cells promotes neovascularization and graft survival in fat grafting
All authors
Yu-di Han, Yun Bai, Xin-Long Yan, Jing Ren, Quan Zeng, Xiao-Dong Li, Xue-Tao Pei, Yan Han
Journal
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
Abstract
Background: Adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs)-derived exosomes (ADSC-Exos) account for the proan (show more...)Background: Adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs)-derived exosomes (ADSC-Exos) account for the proangiogenic potential of stem cell. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ADSC-derived exosomes (ADSC-Exos) on the survival in fat grafting. Methods: A nude mouse model of subcutaneous fat grafting was adopted. Hypoxic preconditioned ADSC-Exos and ADSC-Exos were injected around the grafted tissue. The fat graft sample was weighed and examined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry. Laser Doppler flowmetry and CD31 immunofluorescence staining were used to analyze neovascularization. Results: ADSC-Exo and hypoxic ADSC-Exo groups had a significantly higher weight of fat graft and more perilipin-positive adipocytes than the control groups from 2 to 8 weeks after grafting, and the hypoxic ADSC-Exo group had better outcomes (all P < 0.05). H&E staining showed that ADSC-Exos attenuated infiltration of inflammatory cells around the fat grafts. Laser Doppler flowmetry showed that the two ADSC-Exo groups had better blood perfusion in the graft tissue than the control groups (all P < 0.05). Immunofluorescence demonstrated that the hypoxic ADSC-Exo group had significantly more CD31-positive cells than the ADSC-Exo group. In vitro study showed that hypoxic ADSC-Exos treatment significantly increased the migration (at 12 and 24 h) and in vitro capillary network formation (at 12 h) in the human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) as compared with the ADSC-Exo group and control group (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Co-transplantation of ADSC-Exos can effectively promote the survival of graft, neovascularization and attenuated inflammation in the fat grafts. Hypoxia treatment can further enhance the beneficial effect of ADSC-Exos. (hide)
EV-METRIC
15% (53rd percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Hypoxia
Focus vesicles
exosome
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: TSG101/ CD63/ CD9
non-EV: None
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Function
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
Primary adipose-derived stem cells
EV-harvesting Medium
EV-depleted medium
Preparation of EDS
Commercial EDS
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Below or equal to 800 g
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 100,000 g and 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
60
Pelleting: rotor type
Type 45 Ti
Pelleting: speed (g)
110000
Wash: volume per pellet (ml)
not specified
Wash: time (min)
60
Wash: Rotor Type
Type 45 Ti
Wash: speed (g)
110000
Filtration steps
0.22µm or 0.2µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
None
Protein Concentration Method
Not determined
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
NTA
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
87
EV concentration
Yes
EM
EM-type
Transmission electron microscopy
Image type
Wide-field
1 - 2 of 2
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV210027
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
Primary
adipose-derived stem cells
condition
Control condition
Hypoxia
separation protocol
dUC
Filtration
dUC
Filtration
Exp. nr.
1
2
EV-METRIC %
34
15