Search > Results

You searched for: EV190083 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 2 of 2

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV190083 1/2 Pectobacterium betavasculorum IFB5271 (d)(U)C Piotrowska M 2020 71%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Piotrowska M, Ciura K, Zalewska M, Dawid M, Correia B, Sawicka P, Lewczuk B, Kasprzyk J, Sola L, Piekoszewski W, Wielgomas B, Waleron K, Dziomba S
Journal
J Chromatogr A
Abstract
The extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by plant pathogens of the Pectobacterium genus were invest (show more...)The extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by plant pathogens of the Pectobacterium genus were investigated. The isolates were obtained using differential centrifugation followed by filtration and were characterized in terms of total protein content and particle size distribution. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed the presence of two morphologically differentiated subpopulations of vesicles in the obtained isolates. The proteomic analysis using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry with time of flight detector (MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS) enabled to identify 62 proteomic markers commonly found in EVs of Gram-negative rods from the Enterobacteriaceae family. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) was proposed as a novel tool for the characterization of EVs. The method allowed for automated and fast (<15 min per sample) separation of vesicles from macromolecular aggregates with low sample consumption (about 10 nL per analysis). The approach required simple background electrolyte (BGE) composed of 50 mM BTP and 75 mM glycine (pH 9.5) and standard UV detection. The report presents a new opportunity for quality control of samples containing EVs. (hide)
EV-METRIC
71% (96th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: GroEL
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Pectobacterium betavasculorum
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
IFB5271
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 28
Pelleting: speed (g)
85000
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Lowry-based assay
Protein Yield (µg)
Not reported
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
514
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
Other particle analysis name(1)
Capillary electrophoresis
EV-concentration
No
EV190083 2/2 Pectobacterium betavasculorum IFB5271 (d)(U)C
Filtration
Piotrowska M 2020 71%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Piotrowska M, Ciura K, Zalewska M, Dawid M, Correia B, Sawicka P, Lewczuk B, Kasprzyk J, Sola L, Piekoszewski W, Wielgomas B, Waleron K, Dziomba S
Journal
J Chromatogr A
Abstract
The extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by plant pathogens of the Pectobacterium genus were invest (show more...)The extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by plant pathogens of the Pectobacterium genus were investigated. The isolates were obtained using differential centrifugation followed by filtration and were characterized in terms of total protein content and particle size distribution. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed the presence of two morphologically differentiated subpopulations of vesicles in the obtained isolates. The proteomic analysis using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry with time of flight detector (MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS) enabled to identify 62 proteomic markers commonly found in EVs of Gram-negative rods from the Enterobacteriaceae family. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) was proposed as a novel tool for the characterization of EVs. The method allowed for automated and fast (<15 min per sample) separation of vesicles from macromolecular aggregates with low sample consumption (about 10 nL per analysis). The approach required simple background electrolyte (BGE) composed of 50 mM BTP and 75 mM glycine (pH 9.5) and standard UV detection. The report presents a new opportunity for quality control of samples containing EVs. (hide)
EV-METRIC
71% (96th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Cell culture supernatant
Sample origin
Control condition
Focus vesicles
extracellular vesicle
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
Filtration
Protein markers
EV: None
non-EV: GroEL
Proteomics
yes
Show all info
Study aim
New methodological development/Identification of content (omics approaches)
Sample
Species
Pectobacterium betavasculorum
Sample Type
Cell culture supernatant
EV-producing cells
IFB5271
EV-harvesting Medium
Serum free medium
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Between 50,000 g and 100,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: rotor type
SW 28
Pelleting: speed (g)
85000
Filtration steps
0.2 or 0.22 µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Protein Concentration Method
Lowry-based assay
Protein Yield (µg)
Not reported
Proteomics database
No
Characterization: Lipid analysis
No
Characterization: Particle analysis
DLS
Report type
Mean
Reported size (nm)
184
EM
EM-type
Transmission-EM
Image type
Close-up, Wide-field
Other particle analysis name(1)
Capillary electrophoresis
EV-concentration
No
1 - 2 of 2
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV190083
species
Pectobacterium
betavasculorum
sample type
Cell culture
cell type
IFB5271
condition
Control condition
separation protocol
dUC
dUC/ Filtration
Exp. nr.
1
2
EV-METRIC %
71
71