Search > Results

You searched for: EV100046 (EV-TRACK ID)

Showing 1 - 3 of 3

Experiment number
  • If needed, multiple experiments were identified in a single publication based on differing sample types, separation protocols and/or vesicle types of interest.
Species
  • Species of origin of the EVs.
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the different steps of the separation protocol.
    • (d)(U)C = (differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
Experiment number
  • Experiments differ in Isolation method
Experiment number
  • Experiments differ in Isolation method
Experiment number
  • Experiments differ in Isolation method
Details EV-TRACK ID Experiment nr. Species Sample type Separation protocol First author Year EV-METRIC
EV100046 2/3 Homo sapiens Urine (d)(U)C Merchant ML 2010 33%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Merchant ML, Powell DW, Wilkey DW, Cummins TD, Deegens JK, Rood IM, McAfee KJ, Fleischer C, Klein E, Klein JB
Journal
Proteomics Clin Appl
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the hypothesis that small vesicular urinary partic (show more...)PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the hypothesis that small vesicular urinary particles known as exosomes could be selectively microfiltered using low protein-binding size exclusion filters, thereby simplifying their use in clinical biomarker discovery studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We characterized a microfiltration approach using a low protein binding, hydrophilized polyvinylidene difluoride membrane to easily and efficiently isolate urinary exosomes from fresh, room temperature or 4°C urine, with a simultaneous depletion of abundant urinary proteins. Using LC-MS, immunoblot analysis, and electron microscopy methods, we demonstrate this method to isolate intact exosomes and thereby enrich for a low abundant urinary proteome. RESULTS: In comparison to other standard methods of exosome isolation including ultracentrifugation and nanofiltration, we demonstrate equivalent enrichment of the exosome proteome with reduced co-purification of abundant urinary proteins. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In conclusion, we demonstrate a microfiltration isolation method that preserves the exosome structure, reduces contamination from higher abundant urinary proteins, and can be easily implemented into mass spectrometry analysis for biomarker discovery efforts or incorporation into routine clinical laboratory applications to yield higher sample throughput. (hide)
EV-METRIC
33% (65th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
Adj. k-factor
104.8 (pelleting)
Protein markers
EV: AQP2/ NHE3/ CD10
non-EV: Albumin
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Technical
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Equal to or above 150,000 g
Pelleting performed
Yes
Pelleting: time(min)
110
Pelleting: rotor type
45Ti
Pelleting: adjusted k-factor
104.8
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD10/ NHE3/ AQP2
Detected contaminants
Albumin
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD10/ NHE3/ AQP2
EV100046 1/3 Homo sapiens Urine (d)(U)C
UF
Merchant ML 2010 25%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Merchant ML, Powell DW, Wilkey DW, Cummins TD, Deegens JK, Rood IM, McAfee KJ, Fleischer C, Klein E, Klein JB
Journal
Proteomics Clin Appl
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the hypothesis that small vesicular urinary partic (show more...)PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the hypothesis that small vesicular urinary particles known as exosomes could be selectively microfiltered using low protein-binding size exclusion filters, thereby simplifying their use in clinical biomarker discovery studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We characterized a microfiltration approach using a low protein binding, hydrophilized polyvinylidene difluoride membrane to easily and efficiently isolate urinary exosomes from fresh, room temperature or 4°C urine, with a simultaneous depletion of abundant urinary proteins. Using LC-MS, immunoblot analysis, and electron microscopy methods, we demonstrate this method to isolate intact exosomes and thereby enrich for a low abundant urinary proteome. RESULTS: In comparison to other standard methods of exosome isolation including ultracentrifugation and nanofiltration, we demonstrate equivalent enrichment of the exosome proteome with reduced co-purification of abundant urinary proteins. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In conclusion, we demonstrate a microfiltration isolation method that preserves the exosome structure, reduces contamination from higher abundant urinary proteins, and can be easily implemented into mass spectrometry analysis for biomarker discovery efforts or incorporation into routine clinical laboratory applications to yield higher sample throughput. (hide)
EV-METRIC
25% (56th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
UF
Protein markers
EV: AQP2/ NHE3/ CD10
non-EV: Albumin
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Technical
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD10/ NHE3/ AQP2
Detected contaminants
Albumin
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD10/ NHE3/ AQP2
EV100046 3/3 Homo sapiens Urine (d)(U)C
Filtration
UF
Merchant ML 2010 25%

Study summary

Full title
All authors
Merchant ML, Powell DW, Wilkey DW, Cummins TD, Deegens JK, Rood IM, McAfee KJ, Fleischer C, Klein E, Klein JB
Journal
Proteomics Clin Appl
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the hypothesis that small vesicular urinary partic (show more...)PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the hypothesis that small vesicular urinary particles known as exosomes could be selectively microfiltered using low protein-binding size exclusion filters, thereby simplifying their use in clinical biomarker discovery studies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We characterized a microfiltration approach using a low protein binding, hydrophilized polyvinylidene difluoride membrane to easily and efficiently isolate urinary exosomes from fresh, room temperature or 4°C urine, with a simultaneous depletion of abundant urinary proteins. Using LC-MS, immunoblot analysis, and electron microscopy methods, we demonstrate this method to isolate intact exosomes and thereby enrich for a low abundant urinary proteome. RESULTS: In comparison to other standard methods of exosome isolation including ultracentrifugation and nanofiltration, we demonstrate equivalent enrichment of the exosome proteome with reduced co-purification of abundant urinary proteins. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In conclusion, we demonstrate a microfiltration isolation method that preserves the exosome structure, reduces contamination from higher abundant urinary proteins, and can be easily implemented into mass spectrometry analysis for biomarker discovery efforts or incorporation into routine clinical laboratory applications to yield higher sample throughput. (hide)
EV-METRIC
25% (56th percentile of all experiments on the same sample type)
 Reported
 Not reported
 Not applicable
EV-enriched proteins
Protein analysis: analysis of three or more EV-enriched proteins
non EV-enriched protein
Protein analysis: assessment of a non-EV-enriched protein
qualitative and quantitative analysis
Particle analysis: implementation of both qualitative and quantitative methods. For the quantitative method, the reporting of measured EV concentration is expected.
electron microscopy images
Particle analysis: inclusion of a widefield and close-up electron microscopy image
density gradient
Separation method: density gradient, at least as validation of results attributed to EVs
EV density
Separation method: reporting of obtained EV density
ultracentrifugation specifics
Separation method: reporting of g-forces, duration and rotor type of ultracentrifugation steps
antibody specifics
Protein analysis: antibody clone/reference number and dilution
lysate preparation
Protein analysis: lysis buffer composition
Study data
Sample type
Urine
Sample origin
NAY
Focus vesicles
exosomes
Separation protocol
Separation protocol
  • Gives a short, non-chronological overview of the
    different steps of the separation protocol.
    • dUC = (Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
    • DG = density gradient
    • UF = ultrafiltration
    • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
    • IAF = immuno-affinity capture
(d)(U)C
Filtration
UF
Protein markers
EV: Ezrin/ AQP2/ Neprilysin/ LAMP2/ CD10/ NHE3
non-EV: Albumin
Proteomics
no
Show all info
Study aim
Technical
Sample
Species
Homo sapiens
Sample Type
Urine
Separation Method
(Differential) (ultra)centrifugation
dUC: centrifugation steps
Between 800 g and 10,000 g
Pelleting performed
No
Filtration steps
0.2µm > x > 0.1µm
Characterization: Protein analysis
Western Blot
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD10/ NHE3/ AQP2/ LAMP2/ Neprilysin/ Ezrin
Detected contaminants
Albumin
ELISA
Antibody details provided?
No
Detected EV-associated proteins
CD10/ NHE3/ AQP2/ LAMP2/ Neprilysin/ Ezrin
Characterization: Particle analysis
EM
EM-type
transmission EM/ immune EM
EM protein
Neprilysin;M6P receptor;LAMP2; Tf-receptor
Image type
Wide-field
1 - 3 of 3
  • CM = Commercial method
  • dUC = differential ultracentrifugation
  • DG = density gradient
  • UF = ultrafiltration
  • SEC = size-exclusion chromatography
EV-TRACK ID
EV100046
species
Homo sapiens
sample type
Urine
condition
NAY
separation protocol
(d)(U)C
(d)(U)C
UF
(d)(U)C
Filtration
UF
Exp. nr.
2
1
3
EV-METRIC %
33
25
25